An online petition set up by Microsoft to fast-track the standardisation of its Office Open XML document format masks Redmond's concern over the procedure, according to a leading open-source advocate.
The petition is an attempt to make it appear that Open XML has "pseudo-grassroots" support, argues Mark Taylor, the founder of the Open Source Consortium.
"In the open-source world, there's clearly a massive grassroots thing," Taylor told ZDNet UK on Thursday. "One of the lessons Microsoft has been trying to learn from open source is that — but they have to fake it. If there was any grassroots support behind it, the time to have done [the petition] would have been ages ago."
The petition, which was uploaded to Microsoft's UK site on 29 March, asks businesses to show their support for the Open XML format being fast-tracked through the standardisation process at the International Organization for Standardisation (ISO). The format is integral to Office 2007, but Microsoft is pushing it as an international open standard for documents, spreadsheets and presentations.
"We already have an international standard, the OpenDocument format, and governments are increasingly adopting it," said Taylor on Thursday. "Having a second standard is utterly unnecessary."
Taylor also speculated that the timing of the release of the petition — which was shortly before the school Easter holidays — was intended to make resistance to the campaign less likely. Despite the recent advancement of Open XML onto a new stage of the standardisation process, Taylor also suggested that Microsoft was "in major trouble trying to get Open XML pushed through" and the petition "shows their worry".
That view was echoed by Rufus Pollock, the director of the Foundation for Free Information Infrastructure (FFII), who told ZDNet UK that Microsoft was pushing for the fast-track because it feared the spread of the OpenDocument Format through the popular OpenOffice package. Pointing out that the specifications for Open XML run to 6,000 pages, he suggested that a fast-track would be inappropriate as there were "a lot of concerns about what might be in there", such as patents.
"An over-complex proposal being pushed through is not going to be good for anyone, other than perhaps Microsoft," Pollock said.
Talkback
Two standards will be confusing. In any case M$ standard is both proprietry and closed ......... My simple mind suggests that a standard must be open, universal and free of (M$ type) encumbrances.
A counter petition of should be raised, after all there were plenty of sound and solid objections to M$'s earlier sumbmission.
Microsoft is continuing its embrace, extend and exterminate strategy.
The reality is that the Office Open XML standard does not implement 100% of the XML that is produced by Microsoft Office 2007.
Therefore, anyone using the so called standard proposed by Microsoft can never be assured of full compliance with Office 2007 documents.
Hence, Microsoft's proposed standard is a farce and is simply designed to create a good impression that Microsoft supports standards.
However, the reality is different. Microsoft's key office product has already extended beyond the standard.
M$ is not really interested in anything open. Their only interest lies in making sure that you are forced to use M$ products, at whatever price. There is no guarantee that 30 years from now you will be able to view old documents with their current product, and they don't care.