Thinking out of the inbox

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

While 26 trillion emails will be sent across the world on a daily basis during 2007, into the future, usage is expected to plateau and, over time, to metamorphose.

According to IDC, increases in volume will only hit single figures because, on the one hand, the market is pretty much saturated and, on the other, users, especially the younger generation, are starting to rely increasingly on alternative collaboration tools, such as instant messaging (IM), voice over IP (VoIP) and blogs, to communicate and share information.

Of the 26 trillion emails flying around cyberspace each day, said Mark Levitt, IDC's program vice president for collaborative computing and the enterprise workplace, almost 11 trillion will comprise spam, 10.5 trillion will consist of person-to-person communications, and 4.5 trillion will be email alerts and notifications.

But just how is it that email has become so massive and where did it come from in the first place? Electronic mail, or email as it is now known, predates the internet and was, in fact, one of the "killer apps" that contributed to its current popularity.

The idea behind it first emerged in 1965 when various research institutions wrote the first text-message-exchange applications as a means of enabling users of time-sharing mainframes, which could run more than one application, to communicate with each other.

But the next big step towards a system that could be recognised today as email was made by Ray Tomlinson, a programmer at US acoustics consultancy Bolt Beranek and Newman.

Tomlinson had helped develop the Tenex operating system (OS), which later became one of the most popular PDP-10 OSs and included support for the Arpanet network control protocol. The Arpanet was developed by the US Department of Defense's Advanced Research Projects Agency (Arpa) and was the first operational packet-switching data network — the predecessor of the internet.

But in late 1971, Tomlinson wrote a file transfer program called CPYNet, which could copy and transfer files over the Arpanet, and added it to another application called SNDMSG.

SNDMSG had been written to send messages to other users of time-sharing mainframes, but Tomlinson now rewrote it to run on Tenex. He also chose the "@" symbol, which is still in use today, to combine both user and host names in order to extend addressing to the network. This meant that, for the first time, it was possible to send simple transactional messages to users working on different hosts connected to the Arpanet.

While the medium continued to evolve over the next couple of decades, it wasn't until 1988 that email went commercial. This happened courtesy of Vint Cerf, who had worked on the Arpanet, helped develop the TCP/IP protocol and was one of the founding fathers of the current-day internet.

At the time, however, he was vice president of MCI Digital Information Services. Through the Corporation for National Research Initiatives, a non-profit organisation set up to develop network-based information technologies, Cerf arranged to connect the company's internal email system, MCI Mail, to the National Science Foundation's NSFNet for "experimental" purposes.

The NSFNet was a TCP/IP-based network that enabled academic researchers to access five supercomputing centres in the US, and the move constituted the first commercial use of the internet for email.

Five years later, however, large network service providers America Online and Delphi followed suit and also connected their proprietary email system offerings to the internet — a move that kick-started the wide-scale adoption of online email as a crucial business and personal communications tool that has, to some extent, replaced voice.

But just because email in its current form is wildly popular does not mean to say that it will retain its dominance forever or that its usage will remain the same.

Matt Cain, lead email analyst at Gartner, for one, predicts that the medium will evolve over the next few years in four key ways. Firstly, he anticipates that access will become almost ubiquitous, with users increasingly expecting to access their email via any web browser on any mobile device instantly, particularly as wireless networks become ever more widespread.

Secondly, organisations will start to segment their email users and provide different groups with access to different levels of service in a bid to cut costs. While a typical Microsoft Exchange account costs about $10 (£5) per user, per month, companies are already starting to explore cheaper options for light users, such as factory workers or data-input clerks.

"But this can be a mixed blessing because of the administration costs," Cain warned. "The history of email over the last decade has been that most organisations are trying to get down to a single email system, but we're seeing that start to change now."

The third trend relates to a growing move to managed email services. While the adoption of this model currently accounts for less than five percent of the total market...

Talkback

On March 2007, Alessandro Sorbello of New Realm Media http://www.newrealm.com.au interviewed Dr Vinton Cerf who was in Brisbane Australia to present ‘Internet, Infinity and Beyond’ excerpts from Dr. Cerf’s presentation are available online at New Realm. Mr Sorbello http://www.AlessandroSorbello.com posed questions to Dr. Cerf relating to the development of the Internet and its role in today’s society and what we can expect in the future. The interplanetary internet is set to change the face of communication not only on our planet, but also in the way we communicate with our technology in space.
Dr. Cerf replied when asked a question by Mr Sorbello, “I can speculate about one other thing a large number of senses are going to be on the network, billions of these things scattered a letter the world in parks, building stinky wearing ties its in offices at that time in order to keep track for example what's going on in the world around us and global warming is a big issue in some of the things that we need to know are going to be derived from major sensory networks which a part of the network but also you can imagine the systems are aware of this building like it and when here who is in here and how should I adapt my behaviour to be more effective for the people who are in here that kind of responsiveness is possible as the world in which we live in becomes more aware of us as opposed to how we have to adapt to it.”

Alessandro 28 June, 2007 01:21
Reply

I found the article informative but with SPAM forming such a high porportion of the volume of email traffic, I was surprised the article did not cover the issue of SPAM in greater depth.

For instance, is the porportion of SPAM that clutters the network expected to rise further or is there hope out there for a developing technology that will make serious inroads into find those who are responsible for it?

1000242579 2 July, 2007 14:53
Reply

Gosh but this is all a bit over blown.

We are only looking at evolving electronic delivery tools for traditional hierarchies of communications guys, not the second coming.

Primarily new delivery mechanisms for private and public communication.

Before we used the public postal service or private internal paper based mail.

Now we have the internet or private e-mail for the same jobs, which works better for , or even enables, global business across time zones as well as being faster and much cheaper than hard copy messaging.

Same principles, different transport

Again we have IM as the new telegram or teletype and voice as voice for when it matters, but now with Mobile comms added for voice with the same text option using SMS to replace teletype, VM is an answeringmacine by another name.

Do we need it all? No, unless we have specialist jobs. Its an American thing for peope who have tiny attention spans and want to feel important. In reality you can only take in so much information and respond to it, so which do you answer - the monitored and receipted corporate mail. or the unrecorded IM?

VoIP does not belong in these categories at all, its an enabling technology which allows the unification of multiple primary comms modalities on a single transmission technology. Do we need Unified messaging? Its benn aroun d as an idea since 1996 with Unified voice, fax and email but still has not really joined up 12 years later. Need unproven. It has not, as the article takes too long to say, overcome the proprietariness of the primary applications and their APIs, something Anericans can never agree on in the interests of a whole industry never mind the world - any standard as long as its mine.

The way the traffic gets there is not a primary means of communication. I really doubt the value of IP beyond Web 2 style thin client server based infrastructure and a common trunk network. I don't need my email on my SMS , my Voice Mail in my SMS or email, thanks. I use these media for different things, the messages are of different lenghts, detail and urgency and I want them kept separate so I know how to react.

The ONLY thing I would like occasionally (e.g. probably not a compelling commercial market requirement) is a smart mobile device which will enable me to send an email using my mobile or forward an SMS to an email adress from my mobile when on the move. I know I can send an email from my mobile, but never managed to forward an SMS this way.

In the end its quicker to make the voice call and wait to get to an office with WiFi or a hotel for the key strokes on a real keyboard - mail needs to be done in an office style environment. IM and SMS are on the move half-thoughts conveying different information acted on differently because of the communications medium. They are not and should not be converged or unified.

Unification confuses the media and the message, as it would have done if all the bits of paper looked the same and went in the same in tray with same priority in the days of snail mail.

Its just more hype to sell technology from IP techies and managements that don't understand real marketing. Sure there are uses. When the way people work and what they actually need in the context of location and situation is taken into consideration we might start getting the sorts of unification we do need, rather than the technology people want to sell us, as in streaming low res content on a tiny mobile display at high bandwidth cost versus watching it on broadband at home for free ...... Hello!

Brian Catt

PS And finally the only real use of IM I have seen is also as old as the hills and a bit disposable, its to pass private electronic notes to others during electronic meetings, its just replaced the paper notes in meetings within the global PC conferencing pardigm (there I said para dig em)

Brian Catt 7 July, 2007 20:24
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Paul Smyth

Is this classic FUD? One thing I would definitely have notice is a Mozilla threat to stop supporting GNU/Linux.

1 hour ago by Paul Smyth via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

5 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

11 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

14 hours ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

19 hours ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

19 hours ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

21 hours ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

22 hours ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

23 hours ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

1 day ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

1 day ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

2 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

2 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

2 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

2 days ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Mispam

So what do you do when you can't boot into windows? Why can't I just hold Shift while I power up instead of having to boot into windows and click a...

2 days ago by Mispam on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround