A Linux user who was jailed for uploading a film onto a peer-to-peer service has been told he will have to switch to Windows if he wants to use a computer again.
Scott McCausland, who used to be an administrator of the EliteTorrents BitTorrent server before it was shut down by the FBI, pleaded guilty in 2006 to two copyright-related charges over the uploading of Star Wars: Episode III to the internet. As a result, he was sentenced to five months in jail and five months' home confinement.
McCausland — who also goes by the name "sk0t" — has since been released from jail, but on Tuesday he reported on his blog that the terms of his sentence meant he would have to install Windows if he wanted to use a computer during his probation. "I had a meeting with my probation officer today, and he told me that he has to install monitoring software onto my PC," wrote McCausland. "No big deal to me… that is part of my sentence."
"However, their software doesn't support GNU/Linux (which is what I use)," continued McCausland. "So, he told me that if I want to use a computer, I would have to use an OS that the software can be installed on. Which basically means: Microsoft and monitoring software or no computer. I use Ubuntu 7.04 now, and they are trying to force me to switch. First they give me two felonies, then they throw me in prison, and now this."
According to the website TorrentFreak, McCausland and his attorney will fight the situation. "It isn't the fact that I have to be monitored that bothers me, it is the fact that I have restructure my life (different OS, different software on that OS) and that they would require (force) me to purchase software while I am currently unemployed and relatively unemployable with the two felonies that they gave me," McCausland said. "It is just a ridiculous situation."
The US often takes a harder line on file-sharing than many other countries, although the Conservative Party leader David Cameron has called on ISPs to take a more active role in fighting illegal filesharing in the UK.
Talkback
This guy is a "felon". Period.
He's breaking the law and is now being forced to use Windows.
You do the crime, you do the time.
This is mainly for those who think this guy should be written off just because he's a felon. You need to remember that he wasn't convicted for doing actual harm. It's not like he broke into a DVD rental store and stole movies. Regardless of the context, all he actually did was mirror bits from one hard drive to another. It is nothing more than hundreds of thousands of others do every day. He was singled out and was made an example of by an industry known for its own illegal practices, like the whole Sony root kit fiasco. For Scott's roll in this first-time offense, he has already suffered more mental anguish than most of you can possibly imagine. How many of you have actually talked to him? He's just a normal guy trying to recover from a mistake the best he can, without much support from anyone else including friends through this whole process. What would you do if it was one of your friends? Because it easily could have been. It's not really his fault news websites love to jump all over the Windows/Linux politics that we all know and enjoy. Give the guy a break.