The great British open-source arms race

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

COMMENT

Politicians of all stripes seem to be espousing open source, but that bluster must be turned into action — and soon, says Mark Taylor.

First, shadow chancellor George Osborne advocates open source. Now minister for digital engagement Tom Watson promises to use more open-source software, if circumstances permit. The UK public sector just got interesting again.

Much of the commentary has inevitably focused on whether the politicians are serious, but this misses the point. We are witnessing a cold war — an arms race if you like.

The battleground is UK public-sector technology procurement, and the weapons are open source, open standards and open content. Weapons that make even the mighty Microsoft scared.

The market is enormous. At £100bn — and more than £19bn over budget already — you quickly see why it's important, and why it is worth fighting over. And with economies around the world approaching free fall, the question of whether the politicians are serious is no longer in their hands.

The current technology procurement model is unfair, unworkable and unsustainable, and everybody knows it. Too much money is spent on large systems that overpromise and underdeliver.

The truth is, despite protestation to the contrary, neither the government nor Her Majesty's loyal opposition has done anything significant with free software. And by significant, I do not mean running Apache on their web servers — most people do. I mean deployments on the scale we see in Spain, for example. Hundreds of thousands of free desktops served by core central infrastructure projects serving millions of schoolchildren and citizens. Until one of the British politicians does that, the cost savings will remain theoretical and onlookers and the press will stay sceptical.

No, this has to date been a war of words, and it is now rapidly escalating. But an arms race is a dangerous game and, like all arms races, the escalation has two consequences:

  1. Each round has to be more intense than the last
  2. At some point somebody, perhaps even accidentally, will fire a real shot, and when that happens serious trench fighting will break out

We are at the point where the shouting can't get any louder — both sides have talked it up as far as it can go. What the world, and certainly the ladies and gentlemen of the press, are waiting for now is to see some action. But who will fire the first shot?

It is true there have been a number of large and successful UK open-source public-sector projects. There is even one ground-breaking national one in stealth mode at the moment. They have all, without exception, been driven by individual visionaries within the organisations concerned, often at odds with central office and experiencing pressure to desist.

The existing vendor ecosystem, almost without exception, is geared to the old generation of proprietary providers. That means you will now see:

  1. All sorts of vendors claiming open-source skills they do not have
  2. The usual suspects attempting to redefine 'open' to mean 'closed'
  3. New entrants

Only one of these is a good thing...

Will the government really change or will the Tories get there first? Or will nothing change without continuing external pressure? Whatever the outcome, the reality is that the first group to show a real commitment, and put their money where their mouths are, will discover something quite rare.

Read this

Feature: Ten things you can do to help open source

Ask not what open source can do for you and your business, but what you can do for open source...

Read more +

Open source, open standards and open content are not just rhetoric, though they certainly make great slogans. They form a strategy that, when applied intelligently and with discrimination, can bring about the very changes and the very results that politicians of all parties claim they want. The rest of Europe knows this already.

The smart companies with the highest chance of surviving economic meltdown know this too. The cognoscenti of the tech world have known it for years. Let's hope, for all our sakes, at least one of the UK's main political parties isn't kidding this time.

As chief executive of Sirius Corporation, Mark Taylor has been instrumental in the adoption and rollout of open-source software at some of the largest corporations in Europe, including a growing number of companies running exclusively on free software, end to end, server to desktop. A direct participant in some of the leading enterprise open-source projects, Taylor is also a well-known authority on all aspects of the open-source phenomenon.

Talkback

I wonder if anyone has thought that it's just the word "Open" that they don't like, and not in the sense of open Source, or Standards .. they just don't like being "Open" about anything :-)

Andrew Meredith 26 February, 2009 17:24
Reply

The newly levelled playing fields must become battle fields for the simple reason that proprietary vendors are facing lean times in any case without Open Source software taking market share.

Many must fight hard just to avoid bankruptcy. Expect a marvellous time filled with the unexpected; Windows Open Source Enterpise Server anyone?

spannerman2 27 February, 2009 12:33
Reply

Its a shame we all have to be bankrupt for the idiots we elected on both sides of the pond to become aware that there are alternatives to Microsoft and other proprietary systems.

At least we've got a President now who's used personal technology and knows what it can do.

Xwindowsjunkie 28 February, 2009 13:31
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

Exam boards need to stop specifying Microsoft products in their course criteria and use more generic terms. Schools seem to have gone some way towards using OpenOffice but it's patchy and it's almost non-existent in FE Colleges. The sumer hols would be a good time to install it throughout the Education sector (and at all the agencies and quangoes supposedly advising the government) and lay on some training for staff. Some funding for teams of switched on staff and students to develop and share good ideas would be money well-spent (instead of multi-million pound new buildings) and lay some useful 'foundations'.

ahi2000 6 March, 2009 17:59
Reply

Exam boards DO NOT specify Microsoft products. They scrupulously have not for at least 8 years. YOU ASSUME THEY DO but they don't.

spannerman2 6 March, 2009 20:24
Reply

What formats are on the acceptable list, that can contain the object types necessary to get the job done?

Would, to take a random example, the default formats for Open Office be acceptable?

Not a challenge, I don't actually know. It would be interesting to see where the blockage might be is all.

Andrew Meredith 6 March, 2009 23:17
Reply

I was recalling assignment tasks that were clearly written by people with Office in mind in RSA CLAIT and IBT days but that would have been a while ago. However, I do internally verify FE lecturers' assignments for a wide range of courses and most refer directly to Word, Excel, PowerPoint etc. when they mean document, spreadsheet, presentation or whatever. I've even written some myself and then realised that I've used terms either only in Microsoft application menus or asked for output in a form or with a feature or effect that is straightforward in, say, Word but somewhat hidden or pretty tricky in Write! Anyway, point taken and this is probably another thread anyway.

ahi2000 7 March, 2009 02:19
Reply

Object types are not specified in ICT syllabuses. For 2010 when much course woork may be submitted on-line the boards have said open standards will be used.

At present they simply specify 'a generic word processing package', 'a spreadsheet' and so on.

It is the teacher on the ground in conjucntion with the school that in effect 'specifys' the formats..ie the ones they are used to..so you can guess the rest :)

CLAIT the real offender has dropped its blatant MS course

spannerman2 7 March, 2009 09:17
Reply

: Object types are not specified in ICT syllabuses.
: For 2010 when much course woork may be
: submitted on-line the boards have said open
: standards will be used.

So If I was taking this course, and submitted my work in OpenOffice's default format (an open standard) then it would be acceptable, but if I submitted in Word's traditional .doc format (a very closed standard) it would not be acceptable?

You sure?

: It is the teacher on the ground in conjunction
: with the school that in effect 'specifies' the
: formats..ie the ones they are used to..so you
: can guess the rest :)

But of course; they all go with free, open standard, open source office suites. What else would cash strapped, future oriented organisations like these go with?

... yeah, I can guess.

: CLAIT the real offender has dropped its
: blatant MS course

One down ...

Andrew Meredith 7 March, 2009 13:49
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Roberto_Store

Now On Sale, Unlocked iPhone 4S / Galaxy Note In Factory Box. Roberto-Techie(UK) ”Now on Sales” Smartphone, Android,Tablets,Gadget &...

2 hours ago by Roberto_Store on Samsung Galaxy S III lined up for sale
Paul Smyth

Is this classic FUD? One thing I would definitely have notice is a Mozilla threat to stop supporting GNU/Linux.

4 hours ago by Paul Smyth via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
UnderINK

I agree with the previous commenter wholeheartedly. I couldn't say it better myself. This is very 'Big Brother'. And while I agree with protecting...

8 hours ago by UnderINK on European e-identity plan to be unveiled this month
Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe

Nice to see that Turing's idea of a general purpose computer doing once-hardware-powered tasks in software is now universal ;-) Mary

14 hours ago by Simon Bisson and Mary Branscombe on Software with everything
Jason Burchell

seriously now. I've only bothered to read a small bit of the comments. do me and the rest of the world a favour. stop saying it does not work or...

17 hours ago by Jason Burchell via Facebook on Music industry negotiating over 24-bit downloads
Philip Charles Cohen

Read about it and weep, John Donahoe ... In addition to Visa’s V.me, there is now MasterCard’s PayPass digital wallet soon to arrive; another...

22 hours ago by Philip Charles Cohen via Facebook on PayPal takes phone-based payments to the high street
apexwm

Leslie Satenstein : Where have you ever seen Mozilla even mention this? Firefox is the most popular browser in the GNU/Linux OS, so I don't see...

22 hours ago by apexwm on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
songmaster

SHleG: Do you remember building a clockwork scorpion kit (I'm pretty sure I have a photo of it somewhere) — I think it was called something like...

1 day ago by songmaster on Software with everything
Chris Wortman

Good I love Yahoo! Their search engine is getting better than Google as of late. I find more of what I want on the first page, and usually within...

1 day ago by Chris Wortman via Facebook on Linux Mint 13 ramps up for KDE release
PatrickG

openhgs has made the point for Windows 8 multiple monitors without realising it! With Windows 7 you have to switch the mouse and so your focus...

1 day ago by PatrickG on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Leslie Satenstein

Mozilla has threatened to stop supporting Linux. I guess that UBUNTU is going with another browser. I indicated that if Mozilla stops supporting...

1 day ago by Leslie Satenstein via Facebook on Firefox rapid release improves Fedora Linux
Andy Bolstridge

Much as I abhor Microsoft's licensing practices, this is almost certainly down to purchasing IT equipment via 3rd party consultants - you get the...

1 day ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
Jack Schofield

@openhgs Windows users have had multiple desktops since Linus started writing Linux. They just haven't shipped as standard because not enough...

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jack Schofield

@Phil at Cloud4 What, Microsoft gets £1,200 per PC and £1,622 per server? Gosh, I'm amazed....

2 days ago by Jack Schofield on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT
craigsc

You guys have no idea what is going on at Autonomy. Autonomy could have been a much more profitable organization. The sales operations at Autonomy...

2 days ago by craigsc on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Moley

How does this impact on dual or multi booting? Seems to me to more or less prohibit this, from Windows 8 anyway. Will Grub 2 recognise Windows 8,...

2 days ago by Moley on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
apexwm

I don't understand why there cannot be a slight pause during the boot process so the user can press a key. Many operating systems do this, even if...

2 days ago by apexwm on Windows 8 start-up speed forces USB boot workaround
Gavin Goodman

You can now buy the Xi3 modular computer in the UK at http://www.ocdistribution.com . This can be bought with the Tand3m software, pricing and...

2 days ago by Gavin Goodman on CES 2012: Xi3 microSERV3R
Phil at Cloud4

I agree: Mike Lynch can clearly build a business and manage strategy. I suspect the exit of Mike is more likely the end of a planned handover...

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on HP cuts 27,000 staff as Autonomy chief Lynch leaves
Phil at Cloud4

This is unbeleivable government wastage with only one winner... Microsoft 1 - Tax payer Nil!

2 days ago by Phil at Cloud4 on 6 million wasted licences and £1,200 PCs: welcome to government IT