Politicians of all stripes seem to be espousing open source, but that bluster must be turned into action — and soon, says Mark Taylor.
First, shadow chancellor George Osborne advocates open source. Now minister for digital engagement Tom Watson promises to use more open-source software, if circumstances permit. The UK public sector just got interesting again.
Much of the commentary has inevitably focused on whether the politicians are serious, but this misses the point. We are witnessing a cold war — an arms race if you like.
The battleground is UK public-sector technology procurement, and the weapons are open source, open standards and open content. Weapons that make even the mighty Microsoft scared.
The market is enormous. At £100bn — and more than £19bn over budget already — you quickly see why it's important, and why it is worth fighting over. And with economies around the world approaching free fall, the question of whether the politicians are serious is no longer in their hands.
The current technology procurement model is unfair, unworkable and unsustainable, and everybody knows it. Too much money is spent on large systems that overpromise and underdeliver.
The truth is, despite protestation to the contrary, neither the government nor Her Majesty's loyal opposition has done anything significant with free software. And by significant, I do not mean running Apache on their web servers — most people do. I mean deployments on the scale we see in Spain, for example. Hundreds of thousands of free desktops served by core central infrastructure projects serving millions of schoolchildren and citizens. Until one of the British politicians does that, the cost savings will remain theoretical and onlookers and the press will stay sceptical.
No, this has to date been a war of words, and it is now rapidly escalating. But an arms race is a dangerous game and, like all arms races, the escalation has two consequences:
- Each round has to be more intense than the last
- At some point somebody, perhaps even accidentally, will fire a real shot, and when that happens serious trench fighting will break out
We are at the point where the shouting can't get any louder — both sides have talked it up as far as it can go. What the world, and certainly the ladies and gentlemen of the press, are waiting for now is to see some action. But who will fire the first shot?
It is true there have been a number of large and successful UK open-source public-sector projects. There is even one ground-breaking national one in stealth mode at the moment. They have all, without exception, been driven by individual visionaries within the organisations concerned, often at odds with central office and experiencing pressure to desist.
The existing vendor ecosystem, almost without exception, is geared to the old generation of proprietary providers. That means you will now see:
- All sorts of vendors claiming open-source skills they do not have
- The usual suspects attempting to redefine 'open' to mean 'closed'
- New entrants
Only one of these is a good thing...
Will the government really change or will the Tories get there first? Or will nothing change without continuing external pressure? Whatever the outcome, the reality is that the first group to show a real commitment, and put their money where their mouths are, will discover something quite rare.
Read this
Feature: Ten things you can do to help open source
Ask not what open source can do for you and your business, but what you can do for open source...
Open source, open standards and open content are not just rhetoric, though they certainly make great slogans. They form a strategy that, when applied intelligently and with discrimination, can bring about the very changes and the very results that politicians of all parties claim they want. The rest of Europe knows this already.
The smart companies with the highest chance of surviving economic meltdown know this too. The cognoscenti of the tech world have known it for years. Let's hope, for all our sakes, at least one of the UK's main political parties isn't kidding this time.
As chief executive of Sirius Corporation, Mark Taylor has been instrumental in the adoption and rollout of open-source software at some of the largest corporations in Europe, including a growing number of companies running exclusively on free software, end to end, server to desktop. A direct participant in some of the leading enterprise open-source projects, Taylor is also a well-known authority on all aspects of the open-source phenomenon.








Talkback
I wonder if anyone has thought that it's just the word "Open" that they don't like, and not in the sense of open Source, or Standards .. they just don't like being "Open" about anything :-)
The newly levelled playing fields must become battle fields for the simple reason that proprietary vendors are facing lean times in any case without Open Source software taking market share.
Many must fight hard just to avoid bankruptcy. Expect a marvellous time filled with the unexpected; Windows Open Source Enterpise Server anyone?
Its a shame we all have to be bankrupt for the idiots we elected on both sides of the pond to become aware that there are alternatives to Microsoft and other proprietary systems.
At least we've got a President now who's used personal technology and knows what it can do.
This post has been removed by a moderator.
Exam boards need to stop specifying Microsoft products in their course criteria and use more generic terms. Schools seem to have gone some way towards using OpenOffice but it's patchy and it's almost non-existent in FE Colleges. The sumer hols would be a good time to install it throughout the Education sector (and at all the agencies and quangoes supposedly advising the government) and lay on some training for staff. Some funding for teams of switched on staff and students to develop and share good ideas would be money well-spent (instead of multi-million pound new buildings) and lay some useful 'foundations'.
Exam boards DO NOT specify Microsoft products. They scrupulously have not for at least 8 years. YOU ASSUME THEY DO but they don't.
What formats are on the acceptable list, that can contain the object types necessary to get the job done?
Would, to take a random example, the default formats for Open Office be acceptable?
Not a challenge, I don't actually know. It would be interesting to see where the blockage might be is all.
I was recalling assignment tasks that were clearly written by people with Office in mind in RSA CLAIT and IBT days but that would have been a while ago. However, I do internally verify FE lecturers' assignments for a wide range of courses and most refer directly to Word, Excel, PowerPoint etc. when they mean document, spreadsheet, presentation or whatever. I've even written some myself and then realised that I've used terms either only in Microsoft application menus or asked for output in a form or with a feature or effect that is straightforward in, say, Word but somewhat hidden or pretty tricky in Write! Anyway, point taken and this is probably another thread anyway.
Object types are not specified in ICT syllabuses. For 2010 when much course woork may be submitted on-line the boards have said open standards will be used.
At present they simply specify 'a generic word processing package', 'a spreadsheet' and so on.
It is the teacher on the ground in conjucntion with the school that in effect 'specifys' the formats..ie the ones they are used to..so you can guess the rest :)
CLAIT the real offender has dropped its blatant MS course
: Object types are not specified in ICT syllabuses.
: For 2010 when much course woork may be
: submitted on-line the boards have said open
: standards will be used.
So If I was taking this course, and submitted my work in OpenOffice's default format (an open standard) then it would be acceptable, but if I submitted in Word's traditional .doc format (a very closed standard) it would not be acceptable?
You sure?
: It is the teacher on the ground in conjunction
: with the school that in effect 'specifies' the
: formats..ie the ones they are used to..so you
: can guess the rest :)
But of course; they all go with free, open standard, open source office suites. What else would cash strapped, future oriented organisations like these go with?
... yeah, I can guess.
: CLAIT the real offender has dropped its
: blatant MS course
One down ...