Critics carp at Cisco; Chambers shrugs

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Cisco Systems, the Pac Man of the computer networking business, spent so much money gobbling up its latest targets that some think it should get indigestion. Cisco spent $6.86bn (£4.25bn) in stock to buy Cerent and another $501m to buy Monterey Networks. Cerent isn't profitable and Monterey doesn't even have a product on the market. "Cerent is a great company, they make a great product. I have a major problem with the return on investment," said Frank Dzubeck, president of Communication Networks Architects, a consultancy in Washington, D.C. Dzubeck thinks Cerent's technology, which connects fibre-optic networks and other kinds of networks, won't be as important two years down the road. "I don't think the long-term implications can justify spending $7bn." Another analyst, shaking his head over the cost, said the deal was done in "Cisco money". "These literally are Cisco dollars. You shouldn't look at it as real money," said Craig Mathias, principal at The Farpoint Group. Mathias noted that, even if Cerent was on track to do $100m in sales, that was "barely noticeable" in the $300bn market for telecommunications equipment. "Are customers jumping up and down to buy this stuff? Obviously not. This product may figure quite prominently over time, but it's hard to imagine right now." Cisco CEO John Chambers begged to differ. In an address at the DellDirect Conference in Austin, Texas, Chambers said "anyone who understood our market understood that optical transport was going to explode. The key is to watch the market and act". Chamber also said Cerent's rapid growth means that "it would have fetched a much higher number in an IPO". The deals represent one of Cisco's most aggressive moves yet into the hot market for optical networking, which uses fibre-optic cables to transmit data, voice and video across phone and data networks. They also should, analysts said, turn up the heat on such Cisco competitors as telephone equipment suppliers Lucent Technologies and Nortel Networks. It also lets Internet service providers change the effective size of the data pipe, known as bandwidth, almost on the fly. Service providers such as PSINet, a Cerent customer, could then allocate bandwidth in a matter of minutes rather than the several days now required, Cisco said. Of course, with a market cap above $220bn, trading out $7bn in stock isn't a huge sacrifice for Cisco, even if it's potentially the biggest-ever acquisition of a privately held company. Cisco Chief Financial Officer Larry Carter told analysts that it would be only "neutral to slightly dilutive" to net income. Cisco will take a charge of 7 cents to 11 cents a share in the current fiscal first quarter for in-process research and development. "Everyone's really focused on the cost of the deal. It's not like they're plunking down cash for this company," said James Slaby, an analyst at Giga Information Group. "What Cisco has done here is come up with table stakes to play in the carrier world. This suddenly makes them if not a heavyweight, certainly a middleweight in next-generation carrier networks." Analysts agreed that Cisco was spending as much for Cerent's customer list as for its Cerent technology. The buyers of Cerent's 454 have primarily been telecommunications companies, which typically give Cisco short shrift, preferring Lucent, Nortel and other long-established telco providers. While Cerent is losing money -- it lost $29.3m, or 54 cents a share, on sales of $9.92m for the six months that ended 30 June -- its annual sales are now at a run rate of $100m, Cisco executives said on a conference call. Cerent was founded in 1997 and now has 287 employees. In July, it planned to raise $100m through an initial public offering, but analysts said it was obvious that Cisco had made Cerent an offer it could not refuse. Cisco already owned 8.2 percent of Cerent. The deal also came together quickly. Mike Volpi, who heads up Cisco's corporate shopping, contacted Cerent CEO Carl Russo, and the two met 11 August, at which time Volpi conveyed Cisco's interest in buying the 2-year-old firm, according to insiders familiar with the deal. Two days later, the two men sat down with Cisco CEO John Chambers, and within two hours, the three struck an informal agreement. Monterey Networks makes so-called cross-connect technology that boosts network capacity deep at the core of an optical network. It is now testing products with Internet service providers. Such moves are rapidly expanding the size of the market Cisco is addressing. According to Michael Cristinziano at Gerhard Klauer Mattison & Co. in New York, in 1998 it was addressing a market worth $20bn and had about 50 percent of it. But by 2002, because Cisco is aggressively moving into new markets, Cisco's market opportunity will be $140bn. Cerent's and Monterey Networks' technology "is something service providers lust after, and to be able to do it over state-of-the-art, high-bandwith optical equipment makes all the sense in the world", Cristinziano said. PC Week's Carmen Nobel reported from Austin, Texas. Material from Reuters was used in this story.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

30 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

33 minutes ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

3 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

3 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

4 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

4 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

5 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

5 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

5 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

6 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

9 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

10 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

10 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

11 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

12 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

13 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

22 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility