A Year Ago: Oftel says July 2001 'delay' won't affect UK

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
No unbundling of the local loop till July 2001, says Oftel, Britain can play catch up... Telecoms watchdog Oftel announced Tuesday that it requires British Telecom to unbundle its local loop by July 2001. During a Q&A at Oftel headquarters in London, the watchdog conceded the timeline represented a "delay" but that the UK could "catch up" with its European neighbours. The requirement for local loop unbundling will be set out in a new licence condition for BT, according to Oftel. The timetable for giving other operators access to BT's local loop is set out in the statement 'Access to Bandwidth: Delivering Competition for the Information Age' published Monday. Speaking to journalists, David Edmonds, Director General of Telecommunications at Oftel, described BT's move towards unbundling as "delayed" but denied Britain would suffer any long term damage as a result. "The disadvantages to the UK are minimal," Edmonds says. "We support the government moves to make Internet access universally available, and the UK is not very far behind. In certain instances we are actually ahead of our European competitors". Edmonds stressed that if BT was able to unbundle the loop earlier than the July deadline, Oftel would ensure it did so. "We are working very closely indeed with BT on this and have direct contact with the two working groups involved. We are actively participating with these working groups to ensure the timetable is adhered to." Edmonds says Oftel is using a representative of the telecomms firm MCI Worldcom "to ensure the right systems are in place" and that they are delivered in a "timely and appropriate manner". Worldcom has agreed to discuss Oftel's announcement with ZDNet later today. While Oftel defends its decision, analysts suggest the watchdog has been duped on the technical complexities of unbundling the loop. "I think that BT has managed to convince Oftel that it would be very difficult to upgrade its equipment." Says Susen Sarkar, Senior Analyst, Yankee Group Europe. "And BT could reasonably argue that because this is a new service, they have to put in all the new equipment to do the complete unbundling." If the watchdog has been duped, it is guilty, says the analyst, of not acting on central government's promises. Patricia Hewitt, the UK's recently appointed e-minister has made no secret that she wants cheaper access for Britain, but until the loop is unbundled, competition cannot flourish, which gives BT a free run. Sarker thinks Oftel should have made BT unbundle the local loop faster. "I would have liked Oftel to have pushed for an earlier date, I am disappointed by this," he says. While BT has been vocal in its criticism of Oftel's preference for opening up its network to other operators -- describing it as tantamount to handing over the keys of its exchanges to others -- it accepted the decision. However a BT spokesman warns that consumers may lose out, with operators cherrypicking only the most densely populated areas for ADSL links. "Theoretically what is to stop operators choosing just to provide ADSL services in populated areas with a large number of customers at low cost and say 'we don't care about anyone else'," he says. BT favoured the unbundling option which would allow it to keep control of the infrastructure and merely hand on control of customer service and content to other operators. The spokesman believes that nationwide ADSL services can only occur with BT at the helm. "We would build a national network, covering 90 percent of households. The fact that we are everywhere means that we can provide ADSL regardless of where you live," he says. But Edmonds, perhaps a little agitated at the constant barrage of questions painting Oftel as an insipid regulator, said the path to unbundling was a "tough, tough task" and that expectations for anything earlier than July 2001 are not technically feasible. Key Points:
  • All telecoms operators will be able to interconnect with BT's network and will be able to upgrade BT's lines with their own equipment. BT wants this to be opened so it can access other operator's loops.
  • No restrictions on types of services telecoms operators will be able to provide over BT's network across UK.
  • Oftel will set the price for use of BT's local loop based upon the costs incurred by BT, plus a mark up. During the press conference a figure of £300 a year for ADSL came up. David Edmonds, Director General of Telecommunications at Oftel said that figure would probably be a "low estimate".
  • Reinforcing arrangements for access rights to BT's network a new condition will be inserted into BT's licence covering the types of services and the terms and conditions by which they will be made available to BT.
  • As BT upgrades its lines with the new technology, it will provide wholesale access to other operators on same terms as its own in-house service providers.
Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

6 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

8 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

8 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

9 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

10 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

11 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

11 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

11 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

12 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

12 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

13 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

13 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

13 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

16 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

17 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

17 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

19 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

20 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

21 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility