Excite@Home files for bankruptcy

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Excite@Home, the leading provider of broadband Internet access, said Friday that it will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and sell its high-speed network to AT&T for $307m in cash. With the filing, Excite@Home becomes the latest Net highflier to seek bankruptcy court protection while it reorganises its business. Just this week, Exodus Communications, a provider of Web-hosting services to thousands of companies, also filed for bankruptcy. "This filing is a tool to protect the value of the broadband business for the benefit of the company's financial stakeholders and will help reassure our customers that service will continue uninterrupted through the restructuring process," Patti Hart, Excite@Home chairman and chief executive, said in a statement. "AT&T's offer reflects the value in our network, services, customer base and skilled employees." As expected , the company filed papers with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California on Friday, according to a clerk who declined to provide additional details until the voluminous filing was processed. The bankruptcy filing is part of a deal with AT&T that calls for Excite@Home to become wholly owned by the long-distance giant by early next year, pending approval by the bankruptcy court. AT&T has no interest in retaining the Excite portal, so it could be sold to another company, according to a source. AT&T said that it will use the assets as the core of a larger broadband network. Customers should not experience an interruption in service, the company added. "AT&T remains committed to working with Excite@Home's management and the bankruptcy court to provide uninterrupted high-speed cable Internet service to existing Excite@Home customers, as well as continuing relationships with other cable companies to ensure seamless service to their customers on the @Home network," the company said in a statement on its Web site. Excite@Home's board met Friday and agreed to the deal. Excite@Home's shares closed at 13 cents Friday. In April 1999, the stock sold for nearly $100. The company has 1,350 employees. The filing caps days of infighting among board members and senior executives, including animosity between executives of AT&T and Excite@Home, regarding the company's fate. But both parties agreed at the end that the pre-packaged filing and asset sale was the best solution. AT&T depends on Excite@Home to provide Net access to AT&T Broadband subscribers. Meanwhile, AT&T and Comcast signed a confidentiality agreement Friday that could result in Comcast paying $37.8bn for AT&T Broadband, a deal that would likely include the Excite@Home assets. The bankruptcy filing is the latest in a litany of woes for Excite@Home, a one-time darling of the dot-com era. The company's auditors said last month that its future was in doubt. Later in August, one of the investment groups that funded the company as a stopgap measure demanded payment on the $50m loan. Although tempers flared among top executives in recent days as financial troubles mounted, Excite@Home has a legacy of tempestuous boardroom struggles. Since its inception, it has operated under an awkward ownership and governance structure that included significant input from three major cable operators: AT&T, Cox and Comcast. AT&T inherited its @Home stake and board representation when it completed its acquisition of cable TV leader Tele-Communications Inc. in 1999. As a result, it has appeared unfocused and divided. Nasty bickering between AT&T Chief Executive C. Michael Armstrong and Leo Hindery, formerly its top cable strategist, over the direction Excite@Home should take -- and the role content should play -- left the access provider adrift among the big cable operators' vast assets. Boardroom divisiveness escalated in March 2000, when Ma Bell assumed majority control of Excite@Home's board of directors and offered to buy the stakes of co-partners Comcast and Cox. At that point, AT&T had a 23 percent ownership stake in Excite@Home and a 74 percent voting stake. In January, AT&T traded $2.9bn in its stock for the ownership stakes that competing cable operators Cox and Comcast held. That deal boosted AT&T's stake to 38 percent. AT&T also took a 79 percent voting interest in the broadband Net access company. Some insiders say AT&T's heavy stake in the company compromised the board's decision-making abilities and took the focus away from Excite@Home shareholders. "There's a history at the board level of directors not necessarily operating in the best interest of Excite@Home," a former @Home executive said Friday. "There's a torturous history of folks on the board doing what was expedient, not what was right for shareholders." With Friday's filing, Excite@Home joins a growing list of tech companies that have sought refuge in bankruptcy court. Another broadband provider, Covad Communications, filed for bankruptcy last month as part of a pre-emptive bid to remain in business. Exodus, which hosts Web sites for some of the Net's biggest companies, filed for bankruptcy this week, with explicit provisions that are intended to keep the company functioning as it restructures. The @Home Network, as it was initially called, was founded in spring 1995 and went public in summer 1997. Its backers included legendary venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Hopes were high for the venture at the outset. For example, the company continues to claim on its Web site that "the market for residential broadband services is projected to grow to 47 million users by 2005 from less than 6 million in 2000." But despite having 3.7 million customers of its own, it has been weighed down by heavy debts and unable to reach sustained profitability. In an attempt to provide content that would complement its high-speed connections, @Home bought the Excite Web portal for $6.7bn in January 1999. Also as part of this strategy, the company in 1999 spent $780m for Blue Mountain Arts, a provider of online greeting cards. But the pipes-and-content strategy failed as online advertising revenue shriveled and investors fled high-flying Net stocks. As a result, Excite@Home went through several management shake-ups and strategy shifts, all of which failed to pull it out of a downward spiral. Still, Excite@Home is by far the largest high-speed Internet service provider in the United States, and it is among the top 10 ISPs overall when measured by subscribers alone. News.com's John Borland and Jeff Pelline contributed to this report. See techTrader for the latest financial news in the high-tech sector. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the techTrader forum Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

5 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

7 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

9 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

9 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

10 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

11 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

11 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

11 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

12 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

12 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

12 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

12 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

15 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

16 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

17 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

18 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

19 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

20 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility