Enron's rapid fall can be traced to a steep decline in energy prices, a mountain of debt, and a series of questionable partnerships now under investigation by federal regulators. The combination of issues scared off potential merger partner Dynegy earlier this month. Enron's rise was predicated on its vast energy and pipeline holdings and its ability to take advantage of opportunities in deregulated markets, setting prices for commodities such as energy. How did Enron's online exchange grow so quickly? Before Enron, traders had to make several calls to get an accurate reading on the prices of commodities such as gas, according to analysts. With Enron, they simply went to the company's exchange Web site and clicked on the prices they were willing to pay. Enron priced both "buy" and "sell" items attractively, so hoards of traders came to the exchange because they could make more money. "The demand is still there," said Jim Walker, analyst with technology consultants Forrester Research. "One-to-many online exchanges for highly leveraged financial products is not going to survive" the Enron debacle, Walker said. "However, it bodes well for a many-to-many model of exchange." Added Gonsalves: "The real jewel was EnronOnline. The winners are competitors to EnronOnline." Competitors include exchanges such as IntercontinentalExchange and other energy companies like Dynegy. Analysts said it is difficult to tell at this point who would be interested in buying Enron's online arm, which was one of the primary attractions for Dynegy. Broadband bust
Another casualty of Enron's reorganisation could be a sprawling broadband network currently under construction. The company started building the network in 1998, during a telecommunications boom that assumed there was demand for an infinite supply of bandwidth. Since then, the networking unit of Enron has incurred steep losses, with the company reporting an $80m loss for its most recent quarter Enron owns 18,000 miles of fibre, according to the company. A representative for Enron's broadband business did not return phone calls seeking comment. In a domino effect, Enron's woes could hit network equipment makers, such as Cisco Systems, Avici Systems, Ciena and Sycamore Networks, that have signed contracts with it to sell a wide array of gear for its network in recent years. Sycamore, Avici and Cisco representatives said purchases from Enron are not part of their ongoing financial forecasts and they have already received payment for equipment shipped to Enron. A Ciena spokesman said Enron did not have a material impact on fiscal year 2000 earnings and, in keeping with company policy, would not comment further on Enron's purchases until it reports fiscal 2001 earnings. The company reports fiscal 2001 earnings on 13 December. But that does not alleviate the potential that hundreds of Cisco routers, for example, could flood the market for pennies on the dollar as a result of Enron's financial straits. That could force a company such as Cisco or Sycamore to either repurchase the gear -- to take it off the market -- or lose business in the short term as a result. The company had also planned to extend the online exchange it built so telecommunications companies could trade excess bandwidth to other areas of the technology industry. "The company is now actively trading voice minutes and developing markets for semiconductors and media services," according to information found on its Web site. Williams, Dynegy and El Paso, Enron's primary competitors in the energy markets and online energy exchanges, also built, or are planning to build, fibre-optic networks. It is unclear thus far just how Enron's woes might affect its rivals, according to analysts. More enterprise IT news in ZDNet UK's Tech Update Channel Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet news forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.






