Hacking goldmine as BT publishes remote dial-up numbers

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
BT has admitted that it published the private remote access numbers of a number of British companies on its Web site -- a move that could expose the firms affected to hacking attacks. The numbers were published on the public BT Together Web site in a list that BT thought only included local and national ISP dial-up numbers. However, the company admitted to ZDNet UK News on Monday that an unspecified number of remote dial-up numbers were present in the list. This list consisted of a total of 4,960 numbers, and it's unclear quite how many of these were company dial-up numbers. The director of one company whose remote access number was exposed has described BT's actions as "just ridiculous". BT has told ZDNet UK that this list will be taken down from the Web, but security experts have warned that the numbers could already have fallen into the hands of malicious computer users. Companies that give their employees dial-in access to their networks have been advised to check their security. BT Together is a range of phone tariffs that give users unlimited calls in return for a monthly fee. These tariffs do not apply to national and local ISP dial-up numbers, and BT has said that the purpose of its list was to make its BT Together customers aware of numbers that they would have to pay extra to call. However, the company has admitted that it inadvertently included private dial-up numbers in this list. "Our call-logging software would detect when BT Together customers were making long data calls to certain numbers. We would then call those numbers, and if there was a modem on the other end we concluded it was an ISP, and that number would be added to the ISP exclusion list," a BT spokesman said. The BT spokesman would not say how many of the 4,960 numbers were corporate dial-up numbers, but insisted it was "a very small number". BT now plans to take the list offline, leaving only a tool where users can enter a specific number to find whether it will be included in their BT Together package or not. ZDNet UK tracked down a company affected by BT's mistake. Martin Ryan, director of IT consultancy group DB Consulting, was not pleased to be told that his company's remote dial-up number has been made public. "These numbers would be extremely useful to hackers," Ryan told ZDNet UK. "Even if a system isn't insecure, there's the potential to deny employees access to the network, as we've only got a limited number of phone lines for remote access." According to experts, many companies have taken a very lax approach to the security of their remote access systems. "I know of companies which didn't have any security checks at all, because their sales people wouldn't have to remember yet another user name and password," said Roy Hills, technical director of security firm NTA Monitor. Hills described the publication of the numbers by BT as "a cock-up", and warned that any company whose remote-access number had been made public would have to check their security. "Some companies operate a policy of 'security by obscurity'," said Hills. "Because a number is ex-directory, they believe they are safe from hackers." Other security experts agreed that the numbers would be valuable to hackers. "Any hacker would enjoy having those numbers on his list," said Jack Clark, European product marketing manager at security software firm Network Associates. "Given access to those numbers I'm sure that people would at least play around. If I were BT I'd get those numbers down as quickly as I could." Hills said that firms should not rely on a low profile to keep hackers away. "This won't be much of a problem for companies who have already set strong remote access security, such as user name and password protection, or secure IDs," he said. "It could be easier to get the budget to make changes now." Hills was pleased to hear that BT planned to take the list down, but warned that it was likely that the information has already fallen into the wrong hands. "Hats off to BT for deciding to take it down, and deciding quickly. However, once you release these kind of numbers you can't go round to every hacker's PC and ask for them back." Need To Know, a weekly humorous technology newsletter, first revealed the existence of BT's list late last week.
For all security-related news, including updates on the latest viruses, hacking exploits and patches, check out ZDNet UK's Viruses and Hacking News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Security forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

50 minutes ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

54 minutes ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

3 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

4 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

4 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

4 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

5 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

6 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

6 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

6 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

9 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

10 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

10 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

12 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

13 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

14 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

22 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility