Brilliant: Nothing to worry about

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Kevin Bermeister's Brilliant Digital Entertainment has become a household name in Internet circles almost overnight. But the company's chief executive didn't plan on it happening so quickly. Brilliant, a small, California-based software company, has sold 3D advertising and modeling software for several years. But Monday, the company revealed that it had entered a more ambitious business, called Altnet, aimed at distributing content online using peer-to-peer technology. The move proved instantly controversial -- not so much because of the idea itself, but because of the way Brilliant set about carrying out its plan: Bermeister struck a deal to bundle bits of software along with the Kazaa file-swapping software, which is downloaded millions of times every week. As that software finishes downloading, it gains the capacity to link ordinary computers into a massive new file-swapping network controlled by Brilliant. The company plans to use it for distributing secure content such as movies, music or advertising, or to perform complicated "distributed computing" functions. Some of this has already been spelled out in Brilliant's terms of service distributed with Kazaa. Bermeister says he will be scrupulously careful about notifying people of exactly what is happening from now on. After all, he can't build a peer-to-peer network using the computers of people who are angry at him, he says. Nevertheless, he's got a fair bit of bridge-building to do. People around the Internet have been bitterly critical, accusing Brilliant of installing software on their machines without their knowledge. CNET News.com talked to Bermeister about his plans for Altnet and the storm of criticism. Q: What was the origin of Altnet? What do you see the network doing? A: Brilliant has offered advertising technologies to Web sites for the past two years. About nine months ago we started to provide technologies to Morpheus and then to Kazaa to enhance their advertising opportunities. We got to know the guys behind the FastTrack (peer-to-peer) technology. They already understood there were some significant issues among content owners in being able to utilise and gain benefits from this technology, which was massively distributed and highly efficient. We're an advertising company. We initially looked at the peer-to-peer technology as providing solutions to advertising, then looked beyond it as providing solutions for content. So Altnet was conceived in September or October of last year. Did you bring the idea, or was it the programmers from FastTrack? I actually brought the idea. But obviously, it was just an idea. Niklas Zennstrom and Janis Friis had access to the technologies that would enable the idea to come to fruition. So Brilliant decided to create a business that would utilise the technologies and create a secure peer-to-peer network. User-propagated peer-to-peer networks have some significant issues associated with them, primarily related to security issues, but more importantly, related to the progressive improvement of content that is being offered. Unless there are some centralised controls, content owners cannot really put their best content forward and at least maintain some semblance of control over the end-user experience. So Altnet, as conceived now, is primarily a way to distribute secure content. One hundred percent secure. Users cannot propagate their own content through Altnet. How does it work with Kazaa? What is its relationship to Kazaa? The protocols of the technology, which are essentially based on the same technology that Kazaa is using from FastTrack, are essentially the same. The technology is different, the stacks are different, the functionality is somewhat different, but the protocols are the same. So Altnet can listen for Kazaa search requests and can even decide whether to respond to them or not. If it responds to them, then Altnet can propagate search results into the Kazaa (program). But not the other direction? But not the other direction. The most controversial point so far has been how Altnet is being built, and how the software is being distributed. Describe your thinking there and how that will work. Brilliant has been downloading certain components in the past for its advertising technologies. One or two of those components are functional components that can be used for Altnet. But the primary components, which are required to bring Altnet into existence, have not yet been distributed. At the point those components are distributed, end users will be aware, in the interest of full disclosure, that those components are being distributed. More importantly, when those components are utilised on the end users' desktop to share resources to utilise the resources of their PC -- either though file sharing or bandwidth sharing or distributed processing or distributed storage -- the user will be notified of our intention to use those resources, and the user will opt in to the program. The way Brilliant software has been distributed to this point is by being bundled with Kazaa, and to install Kazaa you have to install Brilliant. In the Kazaa terms of service, there's also a Brilliant component that describes the brilliant software. As these future components are downloaded, how will people be notified? Two ways. The end-user terms will change so that the end-user agreement becomes very specific to the Altnet components being distributed. And second, the components being delivered with either the brilliant technologies distributed with Kazaa or with Kazaa itself will be disclosed up front in the install function. When does the Altnet system become active, and what should people expect from it? We're anticipating that in the next four to six weeks, the working components of the Altnet system will be activated or become active... So we expect between the next 60 to 90 days Altnet will begin making contact with the end users. There is the potential of compensation for users. That's the whole purpose of Altnet. The benefit of distributed computing technologies in a global peer-to-peer network is such that many organisations that are using centralised servers models can begin deploying their technologies out to the ultimate edge. The ultimate edge is represented by users of this network. So the benefits to businesses that are making use of Altnet is being passed on to end users, through a program based around "Altnet resource dollars". Those resource dollars are essentially a reward mechanism for end users who have opted in to the program, to gain a continuous benefit from making their resources available. That benefit will manifest in inventory provided by Altnet marketing partners who are gaining bandwidth reduction costs and cost savings through the use of Altnet.
For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

46 minutes ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 hour ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 hour ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

3 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

4 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

10 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

12 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

12 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

14 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

14 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

15 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

15 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

16 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

16 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

17 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

17 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

17 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

17 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

20 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

21 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs