Competitors and critics, most notably Microsoft, have complained to regulators that AOL's resistance to opening AIM to third parties is an unfair exploitation of its market leadership. During the review of the AOL-Time Warner merger in 2000, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates urged Federal Communications Commission officials to closely examine AOL's IM dominance. Gates also advocated the need for a standard that would let IM services interoperate. The FCC is currently scrutinising AOL for its IM dominance. As a condition of AOL's merger with Time Warner, the FCC ruled that AOL Time Warner must offer interoperability with outside services should it launch an "advanced IM" product. In other words, any high-speed version of AIM that lets people send high-quality audio and video would require AOL to open its IM network. Calls for interoperability have faded among users in the consumer market, but they've begun to heat up among business users. Earlier this month seven top brokerage firms formally announced a coalition to promote the adoption of standards in the fragmented instant messenger industry. Microsoft has made instant messaging a central feature in its Windows XP operating system and its MSN Internet service, and is working on a corporate-communications tool, code-named Greenwich, that will include instant messaging. Yahoo has also seen an increase in the popularity of its Yahoo Messenger software. In a sense, both Microsoft and Yahoo have benefited from the lack of interoperability because consumers end up downloading and operating multiple instant messaging clients. AOL has also argued that developing an interoperability protocol is more difficult than it seems. In a filing to the FCC last July, AOL said it would focus fewer resources on developing a protocol to let outside servers to communicate with its setup. This server-to-server interoperability would require significant time and resources, the company said. Instead, AOL said it would pursue marketing agreements to let companies develop their own instant messaging software based on AIM's technology and infrastructure. In the modeling of such agreements, AOL is using Apple Computer's iChat as an example. AOL's Bentley would not consider the AIM 5.1 feature an example of server-to-server interoperability because AIM and ICQ run on the same network. Competitors remain skeptical of AOL's moves. "Until there's interoperability among the three leading instant messaging players--Yahoo, MSN and AOL--this minor move really won't have a significantly positive impact on the broader (instant messaging) community," a Yahoo representative said. A Microsoft representative did not comment.
Competitors and critics, most notably Microsoft, have complained to regulators that AOL's resistance to opening AIM to third parties is an unfair exploitation of its market leadership. During the review of the AOL-Time Warner merger in 2000, Microsoft chairman Bill Gates urged Federal Communications Commission officials to closely examine AOL's IM dominance. Gates also advocated the need for a standard that would let IM services interoperate. The FCC is currently scrutinising AOL for its IM dominance. As a condition of AOL's merger with Time Warner, the FCC ruled that AOL Time Warner must offer interoperability with outside services should it launch an "advanced IM" product. In other words, any high-speed version of AIM that lets people send high-quality audio and video would require AOL to open its IM network. Calls for interoperability have faded among users in the consumer market, but they've begun to heat up among business users. Earlier this month seven top brokerage firms formally announced a coalition to promote the adoption of standards in the fragmented instant messenger industry. Microsoft has made instant messaging a central feature in its Windows XP operating system and its MSN Internet service, and is working on a corporate-communications tool, code-named Greenwich, that will include instant messaging. Yahoo has also seen an increase in the popularity of its Yahoo Messenger software. In a sense, both Microsoft and Yahoo have benefited from the lack of interoperability because consumers end up downloading and operating multiple instant messaging clients. AOL has also argued that developing an interoperability protocol is more difficult than it seems. In a filing to the FCC last July, AOL said it would focus fewer resources on developing a protocol to let outside servers to communicate with its setup. This server-to-server interoperability would require significant time and resources, the company said. Instead, AOL said it would pursue marketing agreements to let companies develop their own instant messaging software based on AIM's technology and infrastructure. In the modeling of such agreements, AOL is using Apple Computer's iChat as an example. AOL's Bentley would not consider the AIM 5.1 feature an example of server-to-server interoperability because AIM and ICQ run on the same network. Competitors remain skeptical of AOL's moves. "Until there's interoperability among the three leading instant messaging players--Yahoo, MSN and AOL--this minor move really won't have a significantly positive impact on the broader (instant messaging) community," a Yahoo representative said. A Microsoft representative did not comment.






