The FAQs about WLANs

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

FAQ
What do I need for wireless networking?
You'll need an interface card per connected PC, and if you want to work with a wired network or broadband you'll have to have an access point as well -- also called a wireless gateway. Your access point can be a PC with gateway software, a wireless connection and a LAN or WAN connection, or you can get stand-alone routers with wireless. Cards are either PC Card format, Compact Flash, mini-PCI or USB: desktop PCs use PC Card adaptors with PCI or ISA adapters. All cards and access points come with their own antenna and any necessary power supply.
What are the different sorts of wireless networking?
Most wireless networks run under the umbrella term of 802.11, which also refers to an old 2Mbps standard. By far the most common variant is 802.11b, which is 11 Mbps; you'll also come across 802.11a, which is 55Mbps on a different frequency, and 802.11g, which is 55Mbps on the same frequency as 802.11b -- but that won't be approved until the second quarter of next year. Wi-Fi is a marketing term for 802.11b and 802.11a, although the two standards don't talk to each other. You can also use Bluetooth for small-scale networking. You may come across Zigbee, WirelessUSB and MDMA/Nanotron -- at the time of writing these are expected to start to appear in 2003 and no practical advice can be given except to regard them with baleful suspicion. What is the maximum range of a wireless network?
For most systems out of the box, you should expect around 50-100 metres range across open space, but considerably less within buildings. For more range, site the access point or base station as high as possible and as clear of obstructions as you can: the radio signals can go through walls, floors and so on but are severely attenuated. If you replace the standard antennae with high gain, directional antennae you can extend the range of a network to kilometres, but only point-to-point. The world record stands at 72 miles. What speed should I expect from a wireless network?
In general, maximum throughput is around half of the rated speed, so an 802.11b link will manage around 5 to 6, exceptionally 7, Mbps. Some manufacturers are introducing their own "turbo" variants to the standards to get higher speeds, typically 22Mbps nominal, 7 or 8 actual, but this is a very fluid area. Often, these upgrades are free and just need a flash upgrade to your access point and interface cards, but there can be compatibility issues. Also, the further your network cards are apart, the slower the connection. Making small changes to location can make big differences in throughput. Can I make a wireless network secure?
You can secure a wireless network against casual access by enabling standard security settings. WEP should be enabled at the highest setting -- it's not perfect, but it's worth having -- and you should change your network's Service Set Identifier (SSID) to something unguessable. Disable Broadcast SSID. Put your wireless access point in the middle of the building, to minimise leakage outside. If your wireless access point allows it, restrict connections to registered wireless interface cards through their MAC addresses. Taking the above steps won't make your network invulnerable, but it will secure it against passing trade or the bloke next door. Do different kinds of wireless networking interfere with each other?
Most of the wireless networks in use today share the 2.4GHz radio band, and can interfere with each other. However, those that have a high likelihood of being used at the same time and the same place -- Bluetooth and 802.11b, for example -- have been tested together and standards evolved to minimise interference. Other devices -- microwave ovens, wireless cameras, videosenders -- can also cause interference with wireless networking, and should be suspected if you have continued and otherwise inexplicable connection loss or low speeds. How about ultrawideband? Will that make my wireless network obsolete?
Perhaps -- in around ten years' time. UWB is still very new and the first uses will probably be for very short range, very high speed data such as high resolution video. Given the very high level of use of 802.11b, its moderate cost and high reliability, it is unlikely to be usurped as the leading standard for at least two years, after which dual- or triple-standard chipsets including 802.11b, 802.11a and 802.11g will probably take over. Given the modest cost, any investment today in 802.11b will more than live up to expectations.
Have your say instantly in the Tech Update forum. Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our Guided Tour. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

9 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

12 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

14 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

19 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint