AOL wins 'hostile code' ruling

NEWS

In what legal experts describe as a first, a US District Court has upheld a ruling that America Online and other Internet service providers are not liable for "hostile code" sent between subscribers. The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said last week that AOL could not be held accountable for a subscriber's sending of hostile code through its service. John Green, a 54-year-old electronics engineer and founder of JP Green Associates, had accused AOL of failing to enforce its terms of service against a subscriber who sent Green a so-called punter, or malicious software instructions designed to temporarily kick someone off the service. The court upheld a ruling by the US District Court for the District of New Jersey, which had said an ISP's immunity from prosecution for a subscriber's actions covers not only the sending of actionable words, but also of hostile code. The court affirmed the lower court's definition of "information" under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. That definition includes not only communication of "knowledge or intelligence," but also the sending of an electronic "signal," both courts said. The decision is the latest in a long-running legal trend that has shielded ISPs -- and AOL in particular -- against the claims of subscribers who have demonstrated they were libelled or otherwise harmed while using an online service. Most famously, AOL in 1998 staved off a $30m suit brought by a White House advisor after Web site writer and AOL subscriber Matt Drudge accused the advisor of spousal abuse. In that case, the court held that the decency law shielded AOL and other ISPs from claims related to editorial content on their networks. That ruling was followed by the Supreme Court's decision to let stand a lower court ruling that similarly shielded AOL from claims based on content posted by subscribers. AOL said the application of the CDA's "safe harbour" provision was right in line with prior rulings. "Obviously we're very pleased with the results," said AOL representative Nicholas Graham. "AOL believed and argued throughout this litigation that Section 230 also applied to the claims on electronic signals made by the plaintiff in the suit, and the court reconfirmed our position." AOL said it was "proud" to have had a hand in crafting the safe harbour section. One legal expert, who called the decision unprecedented, said it would help ISPs tamp down abuse by subscribers who try to get one another kicked off an online service. "As far as I know, this is the first time a court has squarely addressed the liability of an intermediary like AOL for dissemination of harmful code," said Eric Goldman, an assistant professor at Marquette University Law School in Milwaukee, Wis., and former chief counsel for Epinions. "But it's something we've discussed in academic circles for a decade in the context of the transmission of viruses and other harmful content." Goldman said his tenure as Epinions' chief counsel gave him plenty of experience with subscribers who use an ISP's terms of service to get another member ejected, sometimes over petty complaints. He said last week's ruling, in rejecting claims against AOL for not enforcing its terms of service against senders of the malicious code, would help ISPs and Web sites resist those efforts. "I think it's a good thing," Goldman said. "The reason this law is so powerful and important is that it prevents what we call veto power, when a user says, 'I don't like that person, kick him off.' Having seen the deal flow on the other side, I know that many of the complaints a company gets are completely bogus." A lawyer with the online advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) agreed that the application of Section 230 to hostile code was novel, but by no means surprising given the intent and language of the statute. "Certainly there is a difference...between simply saying something defamatory about someone and defending some kind of hostile code," said Lee Tien, senior counsel for the EFF. "But you have to remember that one of the general ideas behind CDA Section 230 was to give service providers some breathing room so they didn't have to be essentially Internet police. If anyone could allege that someone sent hostile code, and draw AOL and other ISPs into the fray, you would not be effectuating Congress's intent." John Green, who acted as his own counsel, said he may ask for a rehearing from the same court. If he does not choose or is not granted a rehearing, he plans to appeal to the US Supreme Court. "I don't think (the court) really considered the issues," Green said. "They're trying to use this statute 230 to get out of it...but that's not what this is about." Green likened the situation to that of Napster, an online file-swapping network that was forced to shut down after being beset by claims from the recording industry that the service was responsible for its members' copyright violations. Attorneys didn't give the Napster comparison much chance of swaying any court. The CDA explicitly exempted intellectual property claims from the immunity, said the EFF's Tien.

For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section. Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

59 minutes ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

3 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

4 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

10 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

12 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

12 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

14 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

15 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

15 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

16 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

16 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

17 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

17 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

17 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

17 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

17 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

21 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

22 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

AOL wins 'hostile code' ruling

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

US firm puts pressure on overseas ISPs

ISP libel laws 'need global treaty'

ISPs buckle under copyright cases

Ofcom to make it easier to change broadband service

Google set to build backbone of its 1Gbps fibre network

Post your comment

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in Networking

Ofcom to make it easier to change broadband service

Google set to build backbone of its 1Gbps fibre network

Nicira reveals network virtualisation details

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Solutions Architect - Oxford - publishing

Project/ImplementationManager - homebased - DataWarehouse/BI

Project/Implementation Manager-homebased-Data Warehouse/BI

Inside ZDNet UK

A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint

2012 Predictions: VCE FastPath, VI SAN Probe & Hadoop

BlackBerry Bold 9790

How to handle data replication

Ten factors that make Ubuntu 11.10 a hit

Toshiba Portégé Z830-10P Review

BT's archive: Pictures from the vault

News & Analysis

Reviews

Blogs

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features

ZDNet UK / News and Analysis / Infrastructure / Networking

AOL wins 'hostile code' ruling

Daily Newsletters

Topics

Related stories

Post your comment

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Latest in Networking

Featured white papers

Latest jobs

Inside ZDNet UK

Resources

About Us

Member Services

Special Features

Advertising Features