Strengthen your network defences

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Encryption
The next step I recommend is to encrypt your network traffic. Begin by implementing IPSec wherever possible. Here are a few things that you need to know about implementing IPSec security. When you configure a machine to use IPSec, you can configure IPSec to either require encryption or to request encryption. If you configure IPSec to require encryption, any machine that the machine attempts to connect to will be informed that encryption is required. If the other machine is capable of IPSec encryption, a secure channel will be established and the communications session will begin. If the other machine is incapable of IPSec encryption, the communications session will be denied because the required encryption can't occur. The request encryption option works a little differently. When a machine requests a connection, it also requests encryption. If both machines support IPSec encryption, a secure channel is established and communications begin. If one of the machines doesn't support IPSec encryption, the communications session is established anyway, but the data isn't encrypted. There are a couple of things I suggest doing. First, I recommend placing all of the servers within a site on a secure network. This network should be completely isolated from the normal network. Each server that users require access to should have two network cards, one for connecting to the main network and the other for connecting to the private server network. The server network should consist only of servers and should have a dedicated hub or switch. By implementing such a configuration, you create a dedicated backbone between the servers. All server-based traffic, such as RPC traffic and traffic used for replication, can flow across this dedicated backbone. This will help secure the server-based traffic and increase the amount of available bandwidth on the main network. Second, for the server-only network, I recommend that you configure IPSec to require encryption. After all, this network consists of nothing but servers, so unless you have UNIX, Linux, Macintosh, or some other non-Microsoft server, there's no reason why all of your servers shouldn't support IPSec. Therefore, you're perfectly safe requiring encryption. For all of the workstations and the server connections on the primary network, you should configure the machines to request encryption. By doing so, you've achieved the optimal balance between security and functionality. Unfortunately, IPSec can't distinguish between network adapters on multihomed computers. Therefore, unless a server is attached exclusively to the server network, you'll want to use the request encryption option; otherwise, clients may not be able to access the server. Of course, IPSec isn't the only type of encryption available for your network traffic. You must also consider how you'll secure traffic that flows through your perimeter and traffic that flows across your wireless networks. Wireless encryption tends to be a touchy subject because wireless networking devices are still evolving. Many administrators view wireless networks as inherently insecure since network packets are flying through the air and anyone with a laptop and a wireless NIC card can intercept them. Although there are certainly risks associated with wireless networks, in some ways, wireless networks are more secure than wired networks. The reason is that the primary mechanism for encrypting wireless traffic is WEP encryption. WEP encryption ranges in strength from 40-bit on up to 152-bit or even higher. The actual strength depends on the lowest common denominator. For example, if your access point supports 128-bit WEP encryption, but one of your wireless clients supports only 64-bit WEP encryption, you'll be limited to using 64-bit encryption. These days, however, just about all wireless devices support at least 128-bit WEP encryption. What many administrators fail to realise is that just because wireless networks use WEP encryption, it isn't the only encryption type they can use. WEP encryption simply encrypts whatever traffic is flowing across the network, regardless of the type of traffic. Therefore, if you are already encrypting data with IPSec, as you should be, then WEP will simply provide a second level of encryption to the already encrypted data.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Tony Douglas

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

2 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.
BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

17 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

20 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

22 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

3 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

3 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

3 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

3 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint