"We're really down to just a few problems," Hofmann said.
Those problems include Web sites' reliance on ActiveX, Microsoft's proprietary application programming interface (API) for letting Web sites take advantage of the computer's underlying functionality.
ActiveX has long been considered a security liability and was a key focus of Microsoft's recent Service Pack 2 security upgrade for IE users with Windows XP. Mozilla is part of a coalition including fellow browser makers Apple Computer and Opera Software, along with plug-in application vendors Sun Microsystems, Macromedia and Adobe Systems, to come up with a standard ActiveX equivalent.
The second most common problem for Firefox compatibility is what Hofmann termed "Microsoft's proprietary implementation of the DOM." The DOM, or Document Object Model, is a W3C recommendation for letting scripts interact with discrete elements of a Web page.
One way Mozilla got to 98 percent compatibility from 75 percent was by convincing Web sites to code differently. Another was to emulate IE when faced with nonstandard pages.
That strategy resulted in what Mozilla calls its "quirks mode." When Firefox loads a page and its Gecko engine rendering engine detects nonstandard IE-specific behaviors, the browser switches into that mode and is able to render the page correctly -- albeit at a more sluggish pace.
With the success of Firefox in winning market share, Mozilla is finding Web authors more receptive to its message about standards and compatibility. The group is now fielding between 10 and 15 calls per week from individuals and organizations asking how to make their sites work with Firefox.
Even Microsoft has become more responsive to requests that its Web pages be accessible in Firefox. Hofmann credits the software giant's sunnier attitude in part to the $12m settlement the company paid following Opera's accusations that Microsoft was deliberately breaking its pages when viewed with the Opera browser.
Microsoft declined to comment on the matter of its Web pages' compatibility with non-IE browsers or on the issue of browser-site interoperability in general.
But the company noted another area where Mozilla will face significant challenges gaining market share: enterprise desktops.
Like post-11 September presidential candidates, both sides claim to have the best security story to tell.
"Over the last year, we have started to see interest on the part of corporate IT managers worried about security problems in IE who are starting to think about strategies for backup when serious vulnerabilities arise in IE and Microsoft doesn't have a patch," Hofmann said. "We have talked to them, listened to their concerns and are assisting them with deployment plans for rolling out Firefox."
Mozilla's pitch will likely focus on lesser-known enterprise capabilities of Firefox, such as its ability to update browser preferences from a central server.
In the coming year, Mozilla expects to continue to evangelise Firefox to corporations -- something old Netscape hands at the foundation know a thing or two about.
"We see lots of interest," Hofmann said. "The companies we're talking to are across all industries. Entering the enterprise market is a long and hard route, and several of us have experience in it from our days at Netscape and know what it takes to succeed. We're in this for the long haul."






Talkback
I have downloaded FireFox and have been using it for a few weeks. I am happy with its performance and features. The only issue that I have with it is my McAfee Antivirus software will not recognize the browser and will not protect me while I surf the net.
I went to http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm and I was able to download the test files without any warnings from my McAfee Virus Scan AV software. McAfee said that their AV products only work with MSIE. Unlike MSIE, FireFox has not crashed or hung my computer once! I also like the way the browser can be customized by the use of extensons.
Firefox is absolutely amazing. The extentions idea lets me expand and reduce the browser capabilities. It has a extentions for checking my Gmail mails, calander, ftp, irc, rss feeds, and much more. its much faster, smoother, and convenient to use compared to IE, and it does not suffer the occational freezes that i got with IE. Also, In the past 5 months, I have read about 6 security issues or problems witn IE, and only one in Firefox (Bullguard Newsletters).
I'm not sure that I understand the first post. I use Firefox, Opera, Amaya and I/E (where I have to) as browsers and use McAfee Security Center as my A/V and Firewall protection - McAfee works perfectly well with all of them? The only thing I've noticed is that McAfee A/V and Firewall updates seem to connect faster through Firefox than they did via I/E. The protection levels offered are exactly the same for all of the browsers (just as it is for the Thunderbird mail client and Outlook, O/E, Operamail etc.).
I presume the comment is related to updating A/V definitions for McAfee - this is easily resolved, within FF, by setting McAfee as a trusted download site - the opposite of I/E, where everything is trusted unless excluded - this represents a security enhancement as far as I'm concerned!.
I think we have fewer attacs through our browsers since we installed Firefox. It opens pictures a triflr slower, which one can stand, considering the advantages. What is a little more annoying that parts of sites created with Quicktime, moving or still pics, don't appear on the screen. (I am getting bored with the little broken Quicktime icon...)