Dot-net to go non-profit?

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

What's your view of ICANN's fee of 75 cents per domain, which has attracted some opposition?
It's difficult to say as an applicant. It's strange, and it's not equally shared with all generic top-level domains. It's a burden to dot-net and the operator of dot-net. All the other gTLD registries and registrants don't have to take that burden. It's a little unfair. I'm not sure if it's good for competition.

I haven't seen a deeply thought-through proposal about how the money raised from that fee will be spent. Maybe I'll change my mind.

Do you think that ICANN will try to extend its 75 cent per domain fee to other gTLDs?
I would expect that if they put it on other gTLDs they would reduce it from 75 cents. If you were to put it on dot-com, it would be a huge amount of money.

But I don't know what ICANN wants to do. I'm waiting for a proposal that clarifies the idea a little bit more.

What brought you to Washington, DC?
We thought that most people hadn't heard very much about DENIC. It was to educate and give people a chance to meet with us.

When you were visiting staffers and members of Congress, did you ever get a feeling that they were suspicious about dot-net being run by a non-US company?
Not really, actually. I found the meetings very open and productive. People in general are very interested and seem to be very open-minded.

In meeting with the Commerce Department, did you get a feeling that they had a point of view on the dot-net registry or were going to leave it in the hands of ICANN?
As far as I know, the Commerce Department wants to stay as neutral as possible.

When would you expect to reduce DENIC's proposed $5.40 fee even more?
As you might know, under the current registration structure with VeriSign, it's possible to register domains for more than one year -- even two or three or four years. The fees that registrants have paid will not be refunded to their owners.

Will they be transferred to you?
No. (Eventually) it will be possible to reduce the fee much further. We have that information detailed in the proposal. We hope that people will not register with VeriSign for longer than June 2005.

Can you release the proposal?
The business plan detail is confidential. But what we have done is [calculated how much multiyear domain name registrations paid to VeriSign] will cost us. In the most optimistic approach, we believe we can reduce the fees in two years.

To what level?
The most optimistic scenario is that we would reduce the fees in 2008 to $4.80 and in 2009 to $3.60. That's the most optimistic figure.

You run the dot-de domain, but those domain registrations would be cheaper than .net. why?
It has something to do with .net having a worldwide customer base. So you have to provide many more languages and provide the service 24 hours a day because of time zone differences. The personnel costs are higher.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

bordero

ike fuelband is great for every healthminded person ! to work out! theres this website called textme4free.com that you can use to text anywhere in...

3 hours ago by bordero on Nike's FuelBand wristband gamifies exercise
BrownieBoy

> I'm told it's somewhat annoying when people have their Macs stolen > and Apple stores treat the thief as the owner, but there you go. Ouch,...

5 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
Moley

@kevinmchapman. OK, I acknowledge that 'most' was a gratuitous throwaway comment as an afterthought and too presumptuous. As to proof, as you...

9 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Jack Schofield

@BrownieBoy > Works really well for thieves.... >> Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally >> irrelevant, even...

10 hours ago by Jack Schofield on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
raskolnikof

fantastic that the so called piracy bills have been withdrawn. however, these anti-democracy supporters are still in the shadows so lets be alert...

11 hours ago by raskolnikof on SOPA, Protect IP support wavers in face of online protest
Tony Douglas

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

13 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.
BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

1 day ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

1 day ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

1 day ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

2 days ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

3 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

3 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

3 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

3 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

3 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany