Smaller broadband ISPs outshine larger rivals

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

Topics

Which, Broadband

NEWS

The UK's smaller ISPs are outperforming their largest rivals when it comes to customer satisfaction, according to research published in Which  magazine this week.

The consumer rights group surveyed around 10,000 broadband users who used one of 23 different ISPs. It found that customer satisfaction differed greatly between providers.

Metronet, a small UK ISP based in Harrow, topped the table with 91 percent of users saying they were 'very satisfied' with their broadband service. Bringing up the rear was NTL, with just 19 percent of users giving it the top rating.

Metronet sells a range of pay-as-you-go broadband service. The entry-level product starts at £11.75 a month for 400MB of data, with every additional MB costing 0.235p. This price is capped at £22.75 a month.

"Its pricing is complex, but customers gave it top marks for value," said Which.

Eight ISPs achieved ratings of 70 percent or higher and were awarded a 'Best Buy' by Which — Metronet, Freedom 2 Surf, Zen Internet, Nildram, Waitrose, Eclipse, PlusNet and Force 9.

None of these ISPs could be classified as particularly large players in the UK market, unlike Wanadoo, Tiscali, AOL, BT and NTL; none of which managed even 40 percent on Which's measure of extreme satisfaction.

According to Andrew Ferguson of ADSLGuide, a Web site that rates UK ISPs, smaller providers typically score higher for customer satisfaction.

"One possibility is that the smaller providers may attract the type of user who understands some of the technical issues, and thus support can be simpler for day-to-day faults, where as with the larger providers you are dealing with a massed public service, and the support staff will be more script based," said Ferguson.

"One other problem for the larger ISPs is the lack of people with a good technical understanding of ADSL, and the ability to help customers too. The technical staff will often be in second or third line support, and staff retention can be a big issue, as many will find more challenging and often better paid jobs elsewhere," Ferguson added.

In recent weeks, many Bulldog customers have complained that they have received a poor service and have been unable to contact the company. Which found that 36 percent of Bulldog's customers said they were very satisfied with the ISP's offering.

Talkback

aol dialup was crap lost conection every 5 minutes, ntl broadband is a nightmare to use and they get your bill wrong all the time, im now on bt broadband basic £17.99 a month but the missers only let you transfer 1gb a month which quite frankly is extremely stingy and impossible not to exceed this limit so you end up paying £4 a month extra for up to 3gb of data amonth so £21.99+ £1 so £22.99 if you dont do direct debit! so your better off with bt yahoo which is £24.99 and lets you transfer 15gb a month which is more like the amount of data youll transfer if you view lots of emails, listen to online radio, buy mp3 music files etc. bt needs to up its broadband basic allowance to say 10gb a month otherwise its not worth getting

via Facebook 4 August, 2005 14:26
Reply

02079454407 BULLDOG HEAD OFFICE DIRECT LINE:
If you have problems with Bulldog, call their Head Office Complaints number (note this is not a published number), I obtained it through calling Cable & Wireless (Parent Company) Head Office: 02079454407 (ask for Katrina Kenworthy - she is the head of customer complaints :)

via Facebook 31 August, 2005 12:08
Reply

i have just nmade the bigest mistake off my life.ORDERING BULLDOG AS MY NEW ISP
for the last 5 days i have been geting speeds of 25 to 50 kbs on my dload speeds i have called bulldog help desk 36 times in 3 days and just keep geting fobed off by so called first line tech ppl i am told by them that its in the hands of noc department. but there dont have a telephone line so i can call them.
i went to extreme mesures off geting a private
independant advise.
here is the advise and a report that is causeing my slow speeds.Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping google.com

Pinging google.com [216.239.37.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 216.239.37.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 119ms, Maximum = 142ms, Average = 126ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 216.239.37.99

Tracing route to 216.239.37.99 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms host-83-146-18-14.bulldogdsl.com [83.146.18.14]

3 302 ms 343 ms 375 ms ge-0-3-0.31.cll-cor-002.bddsl.net [83.146.17.78]

4 87 ms 30 ms 30 ms 999.ge6-2.mpr1.lhr1.uk.above.net [217.79.160.12]

5 32 ms 38 ms 33 ms so-5-3-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.178]

6 101 ms 157 ms 255 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.146]

7 283 ms 134 ms 132 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
8 138 ms 137 ms 165 ms so-1-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.65]
9 135 ms 136 ms 161 ms so-3-0-0.mpr2.iad5.us.above.net [64.125.28.14]
10 345 ms 211 ms 177 ms 216.200.151.110.available.above.net [216.200.151
.110]
11 471 ms 422 ms 225 ms 216.239.46.246
12 123 ms 122 ms 122 ms 216.239.48.110
13 127 ms 125 ms 119 ms 216.239.37.99

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

well lets look at hops
192.168.2.1 = gateway of router (1ms)
83.146.18.14 = bulldogs network (29ms)
83.146.17.78 = still on bulldogs network (375ms)

OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgID: RIPE
Address: P.O. Box 10096
City: Amsterdam
StateProv:
PostalCode: 1001EB
Country: NL

ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net:43

NetRange: 83.0.0.0 - 83.255.255.255
CIDR: 83.0.0.0/8
NetName: 83-RIPE
NetHandle: NET-83-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to RIPE NCC
NameServer: NS-PRI.RIPE.NET
NameServer: SEC1.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SUNIC.SUNET.SE
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
NameServer: NS3.NIC.FR
Comment: These addresses have been further assigned to users in
Comment: the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in
Comment: the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois
Comment:
RegDate: 2003-11-17
Updated: 2004-03-16

====================
====================To Whom It may concern,
I have been a customer of Bulldog for about 6 weeks now. Paying £29.99, in which is more for your service then my last ISP. I have had nothing but problems with your service ranging from not getting emails to Lantency in my connection. I have spoken to your HelpDesk numerous times and get the same results, NOTHING. Right now I am experiencing major Latency issues 1st hop outside of my home network when entering into the Bulldog ip range. It is not my home network or networking router that is the issue. Your HelpDesk keeps asking me to run trac routes every hour/on the hour and send them the results via email. This is something that I will not do any longer. They also said that it would be 5 days until someone

via Facebook 10 September, 2005 22:13
Reply

i have just nmade the bigest mistake off my life.ORDERING BULLDOG AS MY NEW ISP
for the last 5 days i have been geting speeds of 25 to 50 kbs on my dload speeds i have called bulldog help desk 36 times in 3 days and just keep geting fobed off by so called first line tech ppl i am told by them that its in the hands of noc department. but there dont have a telephone line so i can call them.
i went to extreme mesures off geting a private
independant advise.
here is the advise and a report that is causeing my slow speeds.Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping google.com

Pinging google.com [216.239.37.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 216.239.37.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 119ms, Maximum = 142ms, Average = 126ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 216.239.37.99

Tracing route to 216.239.37.99 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms host-83-146-18-14.bulldogdsl.com [83.146.18.14]

3 302 ms 343 ms 375 ms ge-0-3-0.31.cll-cor-002.bddsl.net [83.146.17.78]

4 87 ms 30 ms 30 ms 999.ge6-2.mpr1.lhr1.uk.above.net [217.79.160.12]

5 32 ms 38 ms 33 ms so-5-3-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.178]

6 101 ms 157 ms 255 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.146]

7 283 ms 134 ms 132 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
8 138 ms 137 ms 165 ms so-1-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.65]
9 135 ms 136 ms 161 ms so-3-0-0.mpr2.iad5.us.above.net [64.125.28.14]
10 345 ms 211 ms 177 ms 216.200.151.110.available.above.net [216.200.151
.110]
11 471 ms 422 ms 225 ms 216.239.46.246
12 123 ms 122 ms 122 ms 216.239.48.110
13 127 ms 125 ms 119 ms 216.239.37.99

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>

well lets look at hops
192.168.2.1 = gateway of router (1ms)
83.146.18.14 = bulldogs network (29ms)
83.146.17.78 = still on bulldogs network (375ms)

OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgID: RIPE
Address: P.O. Box 10096
City: Amsterdam
StateProv:
PostalCode: 1001EB
Country: NL

ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net:43

NetRange: 83.0.0.0 - 83.255.255.255
CIDR: 83.0.0.0/8
NetName: 83-RIPE
NetHandle: NET-83-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to RIPE NCC
NameServer: NS-PRI.RIPE.NET
NameServer: SEC1.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SUNIC.SUNET.SE
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
NameServer: NS3.NIC.FR
Comment: These addresses have been further assigned to users in
Comment: the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in
Comment: the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois
Comment:
RegDate: 2003-11-17
Updated: 2004-03-16

====================
====================To Whom It may concern,
I have been a customer of Bulldog for about 6 weeks now. Paying £29.99, in which is more for your service then my last ISP. I have had nothing but problems with your service ranging from not getting emails to Lantency in my connection. I have spoken to your HelpDesk numerous times and get the same results, NOTHING. Right now I am experiencing major Latency issues 1st hop outside of my home network when entering into the Bulldog ip range. It is not my home network or networking router that is the issue. Your HelpDesk keeps asking me to run trac routes every hour/on the hour and send them the results via email. This is something that I will not do any longer. They also said that it would be 5 days until someone

via Facebook 10 September, 2005 22:13
Reply

Used NTL Broadband since startup and apart from minor initial signal problems have never experienced any problems.

On the rare occasions that I've had to contact Support have mixed feelings. If you get the wrong person it's hassle, but if you get the rignt minded person it's a slick operation.

Price is very competitive if you have tv,phone and b/band combined, and cannot find a cheaper combined deal, even comparing with bt and sky.

Have 3 computers in the household, all mainly running simultaneously with wireless network, and never a problem.

IF it ain't broke then don't fix it!

via Facebook 26 October, 2005 17:42
Reply

Hi

I subscribed to wanadoo after a little research on the net on the 6th of dec 2005. Thinking that they are one of the oldst players in the market i could rely on them providing me with good quality service as well a good wireless broadband connection bearing in my mind my set for wireless is very very straightforward!.
24th Dec im in sitting in a interent cafe 28 calls later 17.99 compensation only to be told today RING BACK ON THE 28TH AS THERE IS A FURTHER FAULT ON YOUR BT LINE. i have wasted so much money on their premium rate technical support number with no solution! Im thinking to myself am i jinxed or is this common? I am also paying them 27.99 a month for their premuim package! to top it all off their cooling off period is fom the moment you recieve the equipment to the day u go live. Surely you should be allowed to sample the merchandise before agreeing to commit to it? DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO WANADOO THEY ARE A BUNCH OF USELESS TOSSERS WHO DO NOT HAVE FULLY QUALIFIED TECHNICANS ID RATHER GO THROUGH TO A CALL CENTRE IN INDIA!

via Facebook 24 December, 2005 21:16
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

14 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

17 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

19 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

24 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

3 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

3 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint