The UK's smaller ISPs are outperforming their largest rivals when it comes to customer satisfaction, according to research published in Which magazine this week.
The consumer rights group surveyed around 10,000 broadband users who used one of 23 different ISPs. It found that customer satisfaction differed greatly between providers.
Metronet, a small UK ISP based in Harrow, topped the table with 91 percent of users saying they were 'very satisfied' with their broadband service. Bringing up the rear was NTL, with just 19 percent of users giving it the top rating.
Metronet sells a range of pay-as-you-go broadband service. The entry-level product starts at £11.75 a month for 400MB of data, with every additional MB costing 0.235p. This price is capped at £22.75 a month.
"Its pricing is complex, but customers gave it top marks for value," said Which.
Eight ISPs achieved ratings of 70 percent or higher and were awarded a 'Best Buy' by Which — Metronet, Freedom 2 Surf, Zen Internet, Nildram, Waitrose, Eclipse, PlusNet and Force 9.
None of these ISPs could be classified as particularly large players in the UK market, unlike Wanadoo, Tiscali, AOL, BT and NTL; none of which managed even 40 percent on Which's measure of extreme satisfaction.
According to Andrew Ferguson of ADSLGuide, a Web site that rates UK ISPs, smaller providers typically score higher for customer satisfaction.
"One possibility is that the smaller providers may attract the type of user who understands some of the technical issues, and thus support can be simpler for day-to-day faults, where as with the larger providers you are dealing with a massed public service, and the support staff will be more script based," said Ferguson.
"One other problem for the larger ISPs is the lack of people with a good technical understanding of ADSL, and the ability to help customers too. The technical staff will often be in second or third line support, and staff retention can be a big issue, as many will find more challenging and often better paid jobs elsewhere," Ferguson added.
In recent weeks, many Bulldog customers have complained that they have received a poor service and have been unable to contact the company. Which found that 36 percent of Bulldog's customers said they were very satisfied with the ISP's offering.






Talkback
aol dialup was crap lost conection every 5 minutes, ntl broadband is a nightmare to use and they get your bill wrong all the time, im now on bt broadband basic £17.99 a month but the missers only let you transfer 1gb a month which quite frankly is extremely stingy and impossible not to exceed this limit so you end up paying £4 a month extra for up to 3gb of data amonth so £21.99+ £1 so £22.99 if you dont do direct debit! so your better off with bt yahoo which is £24.99 and lets you transfer 15gb a month which is more like the amount of data youll transfer if you view lots of emails, listen to online radio, buy mp3 music files etc. bt needs to up its broadband basic allowance to say 10gb a month otherwise its not worth getting
02079454407 BULLDOG HEAD OFFICE DIRECT LINE:
If you have problems with Bulldog, call their Head Office Complaints number (note this is not a published number), I obtained it through calling Cable & Wireless (Parent Company) Head Office: 02079454407 (ask for Katrina Kenworthy - she is the head of customer complaints :)
i have just nmade the bigest mistake off my life.ORDERING BULLDOG AS MY NEW ISP
for the last 5 days i have been geting speeds of 25 to 50 kbs on my dload speeds i have called bulldog help desk 36 times in 3 days and just keep geting fobed off by so called first line tech ppl i am told by them that its in the hands of noc department. but there dont have a telephone line so i can call them.
i went to extreme mesures off geting a private
independant advise.
here is the advise and a report that is causeing my slow speeds.Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [216.239.37.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 216.239.37.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 119ms, Maximum = 142ms, Average = 126ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 216.239.37.99
Tracing route to 216.239.37.99 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms host-83-146-18-14.bulldogdsl.com [83.146.18.14]
3 302 ms 343 ms 375 ms ge-0-3-0.31.cll-cor-002.bddsl.net [83.146.17.78]
4 87 ms 30 ms 30 ms 999.ge6-2.mpr1.lhr1.uk.above.net [217.79.160.12]
5 32 ms 38 ms 33 ms so-5-3-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.178]
6 101 ms 157 ms 255 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.146]
7 283 ms 134 ms 132 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
8 138 ms 137 ms 165 ms so-1-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.65]
9 135 ms 136 ms 161 ms so-3-0-0.mpr2.iad5.us.above.net [64.125.28.14]
10 345 ms 211 ms 177 ms 216.200.151.110.available.above.net [216.200.151
.110]
11 471 ms 422 ms 225 ms 216.239.46.246
12 123 ms 122 ms 122 ms 216.239.48.110
13 127 ms 125 ms 119 ms 216.239.37.99
Trace complete.
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>
well lets look at hops
192.168.2.1 = gateway of router (1ms)
83.146.18.14 = bulldogs network (29ms)
83.146.17.78 = still on bulldogs network (375ms)
OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgID: RIPE
Address: P.O. Box 10096
City: Amsterdam
StateProv:
PostalCode: 1001EB
Country: NL
ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net:43
NetRange: 83.0.0.0 - 83.255.255.255
CIDR: 83.0.0.0/8
NetName: 83-RIPE
NetHandle: NET-83-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to RIPE NCC
NameServer: NS-PRI.RIPE.NET
NameServer: SEC1.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SUNIC.SUNET.SE
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
NameServer: NS3.NIC.FR
Comment: These addresses have been further assigned to users in
Comment: the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in
Comment: the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois
Comment:
RegDate: 2003-11-17
Updated: 2004-03-16
====================
====================To Whom It may concern,
I have been a customer of Bulldog for about 6 weeks now. Paying £29.99, in which is more for your service then my last ISP. I have had nothing but problems with your service ranging from not getting emails to Lantency in my connection. I have spoken to your HelpDesk numerous times and get the same results, NOTHING. Right now I am experiencing major Latency issues 1st hop outside of my home network when entering into the Bulldog ip range. It is not my home network or networking router that is the issue. Your HelpDesk keeps asking me to run trac routes every hour/on the hour and send them the results via email. This is something that I will not do any longer. They also said that it would be 5 days until someone
i have just nmade the bigest mistake off my life.ORDERING BULLDOG AS MY NEW ISP
for the last 5 days i have been geting speeds of 25 to 50 kbs on my dload speeds i have called bulldog help desk 36 times in 3 days and just keep geting fobed off by so called first line tech ppl i am told by them that its in the hands of noc department. but there dont have a telephone line so i can call them.
i went to extreme mesures off geting a private
independant advise.
here is the advise and a report that is causeing my slow speeds.Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [216.239.37.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.239.37.99: bytes=32 time=142ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 216.239.37.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 119ms, Maximum = 142ms, Average = 126ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert 216.239.37.99
Tracing route to 216.239.37.99 over a maximum of 30 hops
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.1
2 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms host-83-146-18-14.bulldogdsl.com [83.146.18.14]
3 302 ms 343 ms 375 ms ge-0-3-0.31.cll-cor-002.bddsl.net [83.146.17.78]
4 87 ms 30 ms 30 ms 999.ge6-2.mpr1.lhr1.uk.above.net [217.79.160.12]
5 32 ms 38 ms 33 ms so-5-3-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.178]
6 101 ms 157 ms 255 ms so-0-0-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.184.231.146]
7 283 ms 134 ms 132 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
8 138 ms 137 ms 165 ms so-1-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.65]
9 135 ms 136 ms 161 ms so-3-0-0.mpr2.iad5.us.above.net [64.125.28.14]
10 345 ms 211 ms 177 ms 216.200.151.110.available.above.net [216.200.151
.110]
11 471 ms 422 ms 225 ms 216.239.46.246
12 123 ms 122 ms 122 ms 216.239.48.110
13 127 ms 125 ms 119 ms 216.239.37.99
Trace complete.
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>
well lets look at hops
192.168.2.1 = gateway of router (1ms)
83.146.18.14 = bulldogs network (29ms)
83.146.17.78 = still on bulldogs network (375ms)
OrgName: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
OrgID: RIPE
Address: P.O. Box 10096
City: Amsterdam
StateProv:
PostalCode: 1001EB
Country: NL
ReferralServer: whois://whois.ripe.net:43
NetRange: 83.0.0.0 - 83.255.255.255
CIDR: 83.0.0.0/8
NetName: 83-RIPE
NetHandle: NET-83-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: Allocated to RIPE NCC
NameServer: NS-PRI.RIPE.NET
NameServer: SEC1.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SEC3.APNIC.NET
NameServer: SUNIC.SUNET.SE
NameServer: TINNIE.ARIN.NET
NameServer: NS3.NIC.FR
Comment: These addresses have been further assigned to users in
Comment: the RIPE NCC region. Contact information can be found in
Comment: the RIPE database at http://www.ripe.net/whois
Comment:
RegDate: 2003-11-17
Updated: 2004-03-16
====================
====================To Whom It may concern,
I have been a customer of Bulldog for about 6 weeks now. Paying £29.99, in which is more for your service then my last ISP. I have had nothing but problems with your service ranging from not getting emails to Lantency in my connection. I have spoken to your HelpDesk numerous times and get the same results, NOTHING. Right now I am experiencing major Latency issues 1st hop outside of my home network when entering into the Bulldog ip range. It is not my home network or networking router that is the issue. Your HelpDesk keeps asking me to run trac routes every hour/on the hour and send them the results via email. This is something that I will not do any longer. They also said that it would be 5 days until someone
Used NTL Broadband since startup and apart from minor initial signal problems have never experienced any problems.
On the rare occasions that I've had to contact Support have mixed feelings. If you get the wrong person it's hassle, but if you get the rignt minded person it's a slick operation.
Price is very competitive if you have tv,phone and b/band combined, and cannot find a cheaper combined deal, even comparing with bt and sky.
Have 3 computers in the household, all mainly running simultaneously with wireless network, and never a problem.
IF it ain't broke then don't fix it!
Hi
I subscribed to wanadoo after a little research on the net on the 6th of dec 2005. Thinking that they are one of the oldst players in the market i could rely on them providing me with good quality service as well a good wireless broadband connection bearing in my mind my set for wireless is very very straightforward!.
24th Dec im in sitting in a interent cafe 28 calls later 17.99 compensation only to be told today RING BACK ON THE 28TH AS THERE IS A FURTHER FAULT ON YOUR BT LINE. i have wasted so much money on their premium rate technical support number with no solution! Im thinking to myself am i jinxed or is this common? I am also paying them 27.99 a month for their premuim package! to top it all off their cooling off period is fom the moment you recieve the equipment to the day u go live. Surely you should be allowed to sample the merchandise before agreeing to commit to it? DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO WANADOO THEY ARE A BUNCH OF USELESS TOSSERS WHO DO NOT HAVE FULLY QUALIFIED TECHNICANS ID RATHER GO THROUGH TO A CALL CENTRE IN INDIA!