Breaking on through to 4G

ANALYSIS

Once every two or three years, a new company appears and makes extraordinary claims about fundamentally new technology. Often, these prove to be more hype than substance; sometimes, however, an idea has the potential to change the game.

This years' contender is xG Technology, a Florida company with a wireless data system called xMax. This will outperform any existing radio technology, says the company, providing bandwidth and range that substantially outclass 3G, 802.11x and ultrawideband while using far less power and causing far less interference. So far, the company has been reticent to describe exactly how this system works, but ZDNet UK has spent some time in conversation with Chris Whiteley, the programme manager for xMax, and Joe Bobier, president and chief executive of xG Technology and the inventor behind the idea. Although we'll have to wait for three more months before the company goes properly public, Whiteley and Bobier discussed the basic idea behind xMax and lent some credence to the possibility that it may indeed work as advertised.

xMax's basic advance lies in improving the link between transmitter and receiver, and to understand that it's important to return to the basics of wireless. One of the things that everyone knows about radio technology is that if you increase the power of the transmitter, you get more range. Greater range also equates to greater bandwidth — if you're listening to a weak station on FM the signal is mono, noisy and unsatisfactory. A much stronger signal comes over as high quality stereo with little or no noise. Likewise, as you walk away from a Wi-Fi hotspot, you don't lose connectivity instantly — you get a slower, more uneven connection first.

Like most things that everyone knows, this is wrong. Or rather, it disguises the true physics of radio. The amount of data you can get through a channel doesn't depend on the power as such: it actually depends on the amount of signal compared to the amount of noise. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is the absolute mathematical limit to data transfer rates. Push more signal through the channel by upping the power — or having a more focussed antenna, or widening the bandwidth — and you can send more data. Reducing the noise will also increase the amount of data that can be sent, without having to boost the signal in any way. "We have nine patents," said Whitelely, "The demodulator is the key technology. All radio systems have to have gain. All others are brute force, we're finesse."

There are two main sorts of noise which exercise the minds of radio engineers. The first is thermal noise, which is caused by electrons moving about randomly in antennas and electronic components inside the receiver. This is what you see if you unplug the antenna from your television: each speckle on the screen is caused by the coincidental judder of a small group of electrons. The hotter the system, the more the electrons move and the higher the noise level — which is why radio astronomers dunk their receivers in liquid nitrogen and other cryogenic coolants. In general, though, there's not much you can do about thermal noise beyond designing with low-noise components.

The second and more interesting source of noise is everybody else. Every transmitter produces noise outside its specified signal. Regulations limit how much noise leaks out and how far away from the central frequency it is, but cannot stop it happening altogether. As a result, in urban environments the noise floor — the signal level without any particular transmission — can be much higher than the thermal noise. This substantially limits the amount of data transferable for a given signal power.

The key to xG's claim lies in their receiver technology, which will reject the noise produced by other transmitters — anything that looks like an ordinary carrier is nulled out — while detecting the pulsed wavelets that xG uses to communicate. "We're taking signals that are not single-cycle modulated and throwing them away," said Whiteley, "and we're operating sub noise-floor. We won't interfere with anyone, nor they with us. The SNR is to our advantage." Any signal that isn't a single cycle long is removed: in other words, most of the artificial noise in the channel no longer exists. xG says that this can give their system as much as 49dB advantage — the equivalent of being able to detect a signal tens of thousands of times weaker than other systems can manage. xG isn't saying how this aspect of the receiver works, only that it's simple to implement with standard analogue radio techniques and that in practical tests it lives up to the mathematical models they've produced.

Assuming this advantage is real, it can be spent in a number of ways: it means the system can transmit weak signals that don't interfere with existing users, that a network can be set up with far fewer transmitters per square kilometre than existing technologies require, that a handset can be set up to use much lower power transmissions than before...

Click for more....

Talkback

I don't think this is going to be as good as it sounds. The first issue that pops to mind is that the system relies on rejecting non-xMax signals. As the density of xMax transmitters increases, the SNR of the xMax will get worse and the power requirements will go up. The time signal will likely help but noise will still creep in.

The basic idea of filtering on modulation is interesting. It looks like that might be a useful method for spectrum re-use. Of course, it would help dramtically if the noise specs for transmitters were tightened across the board.

9 Aug 05 13:56 Reply

Yes, I agree. This is exactly the sort of thing that will come out in trials, and in particular I think the advantages of the rejective receiver will be limited by the density of other xG nodes within earshot.

On the other hand, the figures quoted are very impressive. Even if it doesn't pan out to its fullest potential, I have great hope that the techniques will be very useful in a lot of area - especially, perhaps, if BPL becomes widespread and HF gets mucky.

But we'll have to wait and see.

Rupert

9 Aug 05 15:22 Reply

Oh god another flavour of wireless, how about this story on a code that can squeeze more out of existing transmission rates:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18725071.400.html

You need to be a subscriber to view

10 Aug 05 23:49 Reply

It seems the system (xG) is used OFDM technique.

Could you give the sources or literature about your technical systems?

I really want to make a research about 4G technology.

Thank you.

12 Aug 05 14:56 Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in

Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Membership FAQ

ZDNet UK Live

Tezzer

From what I've read here and elsewhere Viacom stands to lose very heavily from this spat. They have already lost all public credibility since it...

33 minutes ago by Tezzer on Google, Viacom trade blows in YouTube copyright spat
Tezzer

Still finding it difficult to get around the site. Some articles/comments seem to have reply links and some don't - only a link to the poster.

39 minutes ago by Tezzer on ZDNet UK: faster, smarter, still IT all the way
Tezzer

Unfortunately the real problem here is that a very small number of very big companies want to make a great deal of money out of this. Every house...

41 minutes ago by Tezzer on It's high time we had a manifesto for fibre
dava4444

this spam bot is exasperating

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

:D I think the server exchange does slow down a bit round 5 to 7/8 pm but I find I mostly get 3 to 4 MBps on downloads and by that time there...

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

night before last

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

5MBps, I saw 5.8

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

honestly I do get

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

thank you for the support. ..but in

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

if you download a BIG file from the MS site then THAT is your *true* speed.

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

Hi Fat Pop Do Wop!

5 hours ago by dava4444 on I'd Rather Have a Bigger Byte Than a Little bit...Broadband
dava4444

it filters the word 'aittude' mis spelled intentionally

5 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

but with a fair amount of work, possibly. God Bless Dava

5 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

But I think Googles idea could be developed into an able paradigm. right now, no.

5 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

took there repos down for Ubuntu (I think there back now but they took a few months). I don't think there is a perfect answer,

7 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

but the community coding and ideas would be gratis, maybe that's why OEM's can be 'slackers' when it comes to Linux. they just sit back and let...

8 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

continued the bad point about that is hardware, a rival OEM can take your development and use it themselves and to retaliate you would have to go...

8 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

continued Okay how about something like Google's approach 'semi-open source'? . the OEM pours cash in to development and code, whilst opening it...

8 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

Hi Adrian em, interesting, yeah okay I can get this vibe, if I wanted VRec on my Tele I would need an embedded and tiny OS and you're totally...

8 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster
dava4444

Hi Adrian been trying to post for three days .this spam bot is a nightmare. Dava

8 hours ago by dava4444 on How to build a GUI for a toaster

Featured white papers

Achieving PCI Compliance for:Privileged Password Management & Remote Vendor Access

For multi-store outlets, including retail, banking, grocery, gas, hospitality, convenience stores and others, reducing (or avoiding) the cost of in-store system support and maintenance while maintaining compliance with PCI and other requirements has become a strategic challenge.

Download now

Web 2.0 Security Threats: How to Protect Your Enterprise Network

Speaker: Dr. Chenxi Wang, Principal Analyst, Security and Risk Management, Forrester Research, Inc. As Enterprises are increasingly connected to the Internet and as hard organizational boundaries are fast disappearing, security professionals are facing fresh challenges in Enterprise computing.

Download now

MindManager - Tutorial for New Users - Short

This tutorial is for new MindManager users and teaches you how to get started, by creating maps, reading maps and organizing your information.

Download now