Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer vowed to "kill" Google in an expletive-laced, chair-throwing tirade when a senior engineer told him he was leaving the company to go work for Google, the engineer claimed in court documents made public on Friday.
The allegation, filed in Washington state court, is the latest salvo in an increasingly nasty court fight triggered when Microsoft executive Kai-Fu Lee jumped to Google in July in what Microsoft claims is a violation of a one-year, non-compete agreement.
In a sworn statement made public on Friday, Mark Lucovsky, another Microsoft senior engineer who left for Google in November 2004, recounted Ballmer's angry reaction when Lucovsky told Ballmer he was going to work for the search engine company.
"At some point in the conversation, Mr. Ballmer said: 'Just tell me it's not Google,'" Lucovosky said in his statement. Lucovosky replied that he was joining Google.
"At that point, Mr. Ballmer picked up a chair and threw it across the room hitting a table in his office," Lucovosky recounted, adding that Ballmer then launched into a tirade about Google chief executive Eric Schmidt. "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google." Schmidt previously worked for Sun and was the chief executive of Novell.
Late on Friday, Ballmer issued a statement disputing Lucovsky's declaration. "Mark Lucovsky's account of our conversation last November is a gross exaggeration of what actually took place," Ballmer said. "Mark's decision to leave was disappointing and I urged him strongly to change his mind. But his characterisation of that meeting is not accurate."
The Lukovsky declaration is the latest salvo in the heated battle between Google and Microsoft over Google's hiring of Lee. Google has said Microsoft is attempting to scare its employees away from Google.
In the same filing, Google also said if Lee is allowed to join the company before a trial he will not "work or consult in any of the technical areas identified in Microsoft's proposed preliminary injunction. Rather, pending trial, he will open a product development centre in China, and staff it with non-Microsoft personnel."
Meanwhile, in separate court documents also made public on Friday, Microsoft said emails Kai-Fu Lee sent to Google executives bolster its case that the researcher is seeking to violate his employment contract by taking up a position as head of the search giant's China efforts.
According to the filing, Lee sent a 7 May email to Google's founder and chief executive saying that he had heard Google was opening a China office and expressing interest in discussing the matter. In the email, Lee described himself as "corporate VP at Microsoft working on areas very related to Google," Microsoft reveals in the court documents.
Microsoft also notes that, in the same email, Lee linked to his corporate biography, which Google has cited as evidence that Lee's work was not directly related to the work he would do at Google.
In addition, the filing for the first time notes the size of Lee's pay package from Google. Microsoft says the search company agreed to compensation "worth in excess of $10m (£5.4m), including a $2.5m cash 'signing bonus' and another $1.5m cash payment after one year, a package referred to internally at Google as 'unprecedented'".
The document is part of Microsoft's argument as to why a judge should issue a preliminary injunction preventing Lee from taking a position at Google that would compete with his work at Microsoft until a trial can be held in the case. A hearing on the injunction request is planned for Tuesday in King County Superior Court in Seattle. The judge hearing the case has already granted Microsoft's request for a temporary restraining order preventing Lee from doing such work for Google until Tuesday's hearing.
Plans by Google to...
For more, click here...
Talkback
Microsoft are hypocrites. Microsoft would collect people from Borland in a limousine and over a period of 30 months, it lured away 34 employees of Borland by offering ridiculously large salaries and $1 million signing bonuses in several cases. The "brain drain" finally ended when Borland filed a lawsuit and Microsoft did what they usually do – settle out of court.
If anyone plays dirty, its not difficult to see where they may have picked it up from.
Errrr. Nothing here that actually makes indisputable that the "evidence" in the eleged e-mails actually describe the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Fact is that "e-mails" can easily be manufactured.
Until then this is nothing more then PR, FUD, campaining, whatever. But if I was Microsoft I would make damn sure that I could proof to the smallest detail that what I'm blabbing around the world. And I would make damn sure that I wouldn't use my existing monopoly in any way to create another monopoly (or unfair market advantage). Because I know that I would find myself in court yet again and having to pay out sums that won't make my share holders very happy. Certainly because they know that the only way to make up for that loss is to charge existing customers even more for even less. Not good for business. Not good for PR. So what the top of Microsoft needs is a clear headed guy with a solid reputation.
A word of advice to bully boy Ballmer "SHUT YOUR FREAKIN MOUTH " you aint worth the price of a piece of USED toilet paper ( and for those out there that lack the brain to work this one out then use a piece of toilet paper for it's designed use and then see how much you can get for it on the street ) GET THE IDEA ..
Is Ballmer the guy who throws chairs, if so he is behaving just like my four year old Grand-baby, who throws his toys.
He (Ballmer) is a badly behaved little boy who cannot stand the heat and should get the **** out of the kitchen, in a four year old that kind of behaviour is "correctable" but in an adult it is inexcusable,.
If I want to find info - I Google for it - they have been good servants to me since I got a computer, they were recommended by my engineer
Patricia