Q&A ...the initial development, we didn't — at least beyond the normal ways
you work with the standard support mechanisms. Not at the level that
we've subsequently done. While we decided not to do something around
the launch or the aftermath of the launch of Harmony, it did become
clear that there was an opportunity for collaboration.
As the outline of an approach came in, it became clear that putting
together a deep technical and business relationship independently of
resolving the legal issues that were pending was not likely to succeed.
You've got to have the emotional energy to do a deep technical and
business deal; you've got to put a lot of work into it. And if you've
got something else out there, it's hard to align all those different
sorts of energies.
When you were doing Harmony, were you originally thinking that it might lead to a resolution on the legal side as well?
We thought that Harmony was a good thing to do, and we did it because
it was better for customers. And then having done it, it became a
vehicle for engaging in conversations with Microsoft about
compatibility and interoperability.
We didn't create it as a stalking horse, we created it because we
thought it had merits for customers. But having created it, I think it
showed a level of technical rigor and strategic commitment on our part
to interoperability, so it probably helped establish a basis for
technical collaboration between the two companies.
But then you also had to ask, in addition to the technical
collaboration, can you reach common ground on economics? After all, we
were settling a legal action that had value to it. And then can you
reach agreement on a marketing approach. So in order to get something
like this to come together, you needed to get three different rings to
work together in harmony, so to speak. That it took a fair amount of
time to do wasn't surprising, but it did in fact come together.
Over the last month we flipped the switch, and it went from
something we thought we could do in theory to where we were convinced
yes, this looks like something that's really going to happen.
So until the last month it was still theoretical, and things really got serious over the last month.
Literally, the deal got signed at midnight last night. It was probably...
For more, click here...
Talkback
I'm guessing someone didn't read the fine print.
17 Oct 05 23:19 ReplyBut that will show within a couple of years.
As things look now Harmony looks promising as an additional vehicle to get DRM pushed around and it seems Microsoft wants to invest in that.
Now why would a very rich company like Microsoft want to invest in pushing DRM? To make a small profit out of it perhaps? Or a much bigger profit based on proven internal business tactics like Windows and Office have shown?
Time will tell.