A prominent crusader against unsolicited email ads withdrew from an escalating cyberwar with spammers on Wednesday after his Web site and numerous others came under a massive retaliatory attack.
Blue Security, a company that provided antispam software and was widely praised for orchestrating a kind of do-it-yourself campaign to spam spammers, has "ceased all antispam operations", said Sandra Fathi, a spokeswoman for the company.
The surrender comes after the company's Web site, along with those of many of its partners, were hobbled by a denial-of-service attack earlier this month. The DoS attack, which used thousands of commandeered computers to overload the sites' servers with traffic, is believed to have originated with one Russia-based spammer, Fathi said.
The brazen show of power by the spammer is reflective of the defiant nature of these kinds of rogue advertisers. Almost as old as the Internet, unsolicited email continues to swamp email in-boxes and to clog servers, even as law enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies have tried to stop the practice.
Eran Reshef, Blue Security's chief executive, thought he had the answer. He encouraged half a million of the company's customers to send replies to the spam they received. The combined traffic overloaded the spammers' servers and crippled their ability to send emails. This resulted in some well-known spam companies agreeing to stop emailing Blue Security's customers.
Blue Security's triumph was short-lived. Instead of capitulating, one spammer launched a denial-of-service attack earlier this month. According to security Web site SecurityFocus, the attacks overwhelmed several Web sites and Internet service providers. The spammer then threatened Blue Security.
The company could either shut down or the next attack would include a computer virus.
With innocent companies and Internet users potentially at risk, Reshef had no choice but to yield to the demands, Fathi said.
"The company is unable to fight this battle on its own," Fathi said. "This (spammer) has shown that he's willing to harm hundreds of innocent bystanders... (Reshef) didn't want to take the risk that these other businesses would come under attack."
Blue Security is now trying to determine whether there are other uses for its antispam technology, she said.
Talkback
Spineless fool. Breaking in the heat of the battle! well done and thanks for nothing. You've set a great example for other spammers out there who have been monitoring you all this time.
If you just throw enough tantrum, you'll get your way. Isn't that right Reshef?
So this is it...
Once more "the good" are defeated by "the ugly" in the battle of overloading the internet users' browsing and mailing with penis enlargement and other "fine" and relevant products!
I honestly thought that the internet should be for the good of all, but apperently not... And respect the individual's privacy? Noo...
Where are the will of gouvernments and ISP's to REALLY deal with this problem?
Some time ago I read, in my opnion, a rather nonsense statement that the internet would cease to exist in the future, due to spam. At that time I laughed, but today...
It is true that the internet is anarchistic. However one have to remember it "exist" because it is found usefull and interesting. And only as long as...
I foresee a day where people are making calls and sending letters and faxes again. And a day where networks are closed, like VPNs and MPLSs, once more.
So the internet...
This is where we all should stand together against the spammer, and not let them win.
Each win for them makes it longer for the good guys to win in the long run, or are we saying thast its the bad guys who will win.
Norman
Understand this. There are organizations out there that would like to make it look that spammers and such are winning. Until they get the kind of laws, control, whatever they want to move in for the kill to fullfil their world of self interested dreams.
Really, one spammer using a botnet to take the Internet down? How easy would it be for any ISP to detect the repeating attack method used and put a deny filter in place on the router in question. 30 Seconds? 60 maybe? It wouldn't even register as a glitch depending on the routing protocol used.