Protect your privacy when searching online

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS

AOL's publication of the search histories of more than 650,000 of its users should reinforce an important point: What you type in online may not be as private as you think.

Search engines place a multibillion-dollar infrastructure at the hands of any random user who stops by their Web site. The price you pay, however, is that the company may hold on to your search queries — which can provide a glimpse into your life — forever.

Check out the following list of frequently asked questions to help preserve your privacy while using search engines.

Q: Why did AOL publish those search histories?
A: A research arm of AOL published the data in the hope that the information would help other scientists and statisticians learn more about how people use the Internet. AOL apologised for this on Monday, saying the release had not been properly vetted.

How can I protect myself from a search engine doing the same thing in the future?
Because of the negative press AOL received, the company is not likely to do the same thing anytime soon.

But of the big four search engines (AOL, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo), only Google resisted a Justice Department subpoena that asked for similar search terms. Keep reading for more detailed suggestions.

Why do search engines store what I type in after my search is complete?
No law requires search companies to delete your search terms, and there are some business justifications for keeping them around, at least for a little while.

For instance, keeping detailed records can help in identifying click fraud (faking clicks on Web ads to drive up a rival's costs), and in optimising search results for different geographic areas. Compiling a user profile can aid in tailoring search results in products such as Google Personalised Search. Also, disk storage is cheap, and engineers tend to prefer to keep data rather than delete it.

But it's hardly clear that a compelling reason exists for keeping older records — beyond a few months — unless a customer voluntarily chooses options such as personalisation.

Do any search engines not store records of what their users do?
Yes. Ixquick.com, a start-up funded by Holland Ventures of Amsterdam, pledges to do precisely that.

The Netherlands-based company proudly says it doesn't keep records of its users' Internet addresses. In other words, it does save search terms, but the company says it's unable to link them to any person, unique ID number or Internet address.

"I'm a firm believer in the privacy cause," Ixquick.com chief executive Robert Beens said in a recent interview. "I can imagine a lot of people are keen on their privacy."

Beens said: "We delete the (Internet protocol) address of users. We have a program running which opens the log files and deletes the user IP addresses and overwrites them." And, Beens said, the company removed the unique ID from Ixquick.com's cookies.

Is AOL thinking of doing the same thing?
Nobody knows. But Jason Calacanis, who co-founded blog publisher Weblogs Inc, which AOL bought last year, says it should.

In a blog post on Monday, Calacanis wrote: "Frankly, I want us to NOT KEEP LOGS of our search data. Yep, you heard that right... we shouldn't even keep this data."

How does Ixquick.com work?
Ixquick.com is what's known as a meta-search engine. For US queries, it contacts Yahoo, AltaVista, Alltheweb, Entireweb, Amazon, Netscape, Wikipedia and a handful of other sites. It compiles the results, decides which Web sites received the most votes as relevant, and displays the top scorers.

"It is possible to fool one search engine by modifying the links, tags, or content of the site," Beens said. "To fool 11 search engines is very hard."

OK, Ixquick.com is fine and all that, but I want to keep using my favourite search engine. How can I protect my privacy while doing that?
The first thing you should do is clear the cookies that are set by search engines — those let the company correlate your repeat visits. In Firefox, go to Preferences and select Privacy. There you have the option…

Talkback

There is another se to place on your safe list.
http://www.scroogle.org/

via Facebook 16 August, 2006 13:35
Reply

Dear Sir,

On this subject, we take the liberty to write you about a software we have just created to protect against privacy violation by search companies (with the aim of not being detected).

The software is described and available on our website www.sansHistory.com.

We would appreciate your comments - at your convenience - and stay at your disposition for any further information you may need.

Thank you.
K. Mizan.
users@sansHistory.com

via Facebook 4 October, 2006 08:02
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Andy Bolstridge

Performance isn't really the big thing at the moment - not when my ADSL connection will only provide a 8mbps bottleneck to the 3.5gbps speeds these...

2 minutes ago by Andy Bolstridge via Facebook on Next-generation 802.11ac routers
pjc158

So when is Amazon buying Waterstones?

2 hours ago by pjc158 on Waterstones to sell Kindles with in-store offers
J.A. Watson

@JoshArg - Well, I am writing this from my N150 Plus, running Ubuntu 12.04 and using a Bluetooth mouse (well, to be totally correct it is a...

2 hours ago by J.A. Watson on Samsung N150 Plus Netbook - Ubuntu Netbook Edition 10.04
J.A. Watson

@duncanjmurray - At least n the case of the specific system I put the SSD into, it is not the case. The boot time improvement is substantial, but...

2 hours ago by J.A. Watson on Netbook Upgrade - SSD IN, Windows OUT
archerthom

Sounds like only those who have bought their Kindle from Waterstones will be able to use them in-store - very disappointing. I have no intention...

4 hours ago by archerthom on Waterstones to sell Kindles with in-store offers
AndyPagin

From my mainframe operating days... 1) Play hoopla with write permit rings & a can of screen cleaner. 2) Make enormous paper chains (Christmas...

5 hours ago by AndyPagin on Ten IT jobs to save up for those rare lulls
61253

An OS X perspective Filenames beginning with a dot/period (.) should not be equated with HFS Plus resource forks; misunderstandings around ._ (dot...

5 hours ago by 61253 on SharePoint deployment: Pitfalls of a pioneer
ians1

There are many legal download sites for music at least that do not charge an arm and a leg like itunes or Napster. The "real" cost of an mp3 file...

6 hours ago by ians1 on The Pirate Bay infringes copyright, High Court decides
Jon Howells

@Crupal.. How does refusing your websites cookies help my privacy? A quick look at your page script reveals four sets of code provided by 3rd...

13 hours ago by Jon Howells via Facebook on Privacy watchdog to chase big companies over cookie law
Paul Carloss

There are hundreds, if not thousands of filesharing torrent sites, The Pirate Bay (TPB) is only one of them, while the TPB is blocked many more...

14 hours ago by Paul Carloss via Facebook on The Pirate Bay infringes copyright, High Court decides
Rebin Simpson

So could users DownGrade if the new OS didn't worked correctly ?

17 hours ago by Rebin Simpson on Sony delivers on Xperia Ice Cream Sandwich promise
duncanjmurray

Hmmm, I thought that with SSDs you could get to the mythical ubuntu 10 sec boot time? Is this not the case?

17 hours ago by duncanjmurray on Netbook Upgrade - SSD IN, Windows OUT
JoshArg

Thanks once again! I have installed Linux Mint 13 (Maya) everything runs well but.. bluetooh is not present, "there is no blueetooth adapter" do...

17 hours ago by JoshArg on Samsung N150 Plus Netbook - Ubuntu Netbook Edition 10.04
zdnetukuser

@JAW-- There’s a better-than-even chance that, had you made another choice of SSD, you would have noticed no improvement in battery life...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Netbook Upgrade - SSD IN, Windows OUT
Amb Rose

Please stop connecting the 'ATeam' to the UK Anonymous collective. Anonymous and the ATeam are not connected. The ATeam are not part of, affiliated...

2 days ago by Amb Rose via Facebook on UK Anonymous keeps up DDoS barrage on ICO
cpupal

Hi All I have looked into the cookie law today, there are a few solutions that these websites can use. Just add the widget and update your policy...

2 days ago by cpupal on Privacy watchdog to chase big companies over cookie law
dropz42

I read that many of the governments own websites are not yet compliant...shouldn't they sort that out before chasing others - slightly hypocritical !

2 days ago by dropz42 on Privacy watchdog to chase big companies over cookie law
Charles McLellan

@larrylisser Thanks for the feedback; you're quite right to surmise that the article's main point was to inform about developments in cloud-based...

2 days ago by Charles McLellan on VideoMeet: cloud-based video communication
J.A. Watson

@zdnetukuser - Thanks for pointing this out. I must admit that the relative power consumption of different manufacturers and models was something...

2 days ago by J.A. Watson on Netbook Upgrade - SSD IN, Windows OUT
J.A. Watson

@stevoparsons - You are absolutely right, I do expect a new system that is being connected to the Internet for the first time to pick up updates....

2 days ago by J.A. Watson on Windows Update Never Stops Sucking