German scientists claim to have broken the light-speed barrier, which could blow away the known limitations of modern networking, but the technology is unlikely to make it into a product — if at all — until most administrators working today have retired.
Exceeding the speed of light, approximately 300,000km per second, is supposed to be completely impossible. According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would take an infinite amount of energy to accelerate an object through the light barrier.
But two German physicists claim to have forced light to overcome its own speed limit using the strange phenomenon known as "quantum tunnelling".
Gunter Nimtz, one of the physicists from the University of Koblenz, told New Scientist magazine: "For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of."
However, the scientists' claims should be treated with some scepticism until they have been investigated by the wider scientific community, according to Dr Kevin McIsaac, an analyst at Sydney-based firm IBRS, who holds a PhD in theoretical atomic physics.
"From time to time we do hear about these interesting experiments, often by well-meaning scientists. But, until this has been validated by the scientific community, you want to treat it with some scepticism," said McIsaac.
Read this
100Gbps Ethernet is coming
Telecoms industry is pushing for a tenfold increase in performance by the end of the decade...
"To date, all indications are that no information can travel faster than the speed of light. There are some experiments that indicate you can have interactions that appear to be faster than the speed of light but you still can't transmit information faster than the speed of light," said McIsaac.
The scientists set up an experiment in which microwave photons — energetic packets of light — appeared to travel "instantaneously" between two prisms forming the halves of a cube placed a metre apart.
When the prisms were placed together, photons fired at one edge passed straight through them, as expected. After they were moved apart, most of the photons reflected off the first prism they encountered and were picked up by a detector. But a few photons appeared to "tunnel" through the gap separating them as if the prisms were still held together.
Although these photons had travelled a longer distance, they arrived at their detector at exactly the same time as the reflected photons. In effect, they seemed to have travelled faster than light.
Quantum tunnelling is a well known phenomenon that occurs as a direct result of the strange uncertainty which pervades nature at very small scales. It allows subatomic particles to break apparently unbreakable barriers.
Even if the discovery turns out to be real, IBRS's McIsaac isn't convinced that it could be turned into a useful product: "About 15 or 20 years ago a scientist claimed to have discovered cold fusion... but still nothing has happened. One of the big promises has been quantum computing and we still don't have it. Also, photonic computing — we still don't have that either."
"So, frankly, I would suggest that anybody who is an administrator today probably won't see this till they have retired," McIsaac said.
Quantum tunnelling
To understand the principle of quantum tunnelling, consider a ball being bowled up a hill. If the ball has insufficient velocity, it will not roll over the top of the hill and appear on the other side. But, if the ball was a subatomic particle, subject to quantum laws, it would also behave like a wave.
The "wave function" describing the particle would represent the probability of finding it at a certain location. This wave could extend to the other side of the hill, meaning there will always be a small possibility of the particle being detected there unexpectedly.
Read this
Researchers claim stealth encryption breakthrough
Annual showcase for US optical society explains how noise can be used to successfully transport encrypted messages...
When this happens it is as if the particle has "tunnelled" through the hill.
The effect is already used in a practical way in the scanning tunnelling microscope, which can image surface features at an atomic scale and relies on the "tunnelling" of electrons.
Tunnelling is also involved in radioactivity and nuclear fusion. Without it, the sun could not shine, and some scientists believe the universe itself only came into existence because of tunnelling.






Talkback
It doesn't surprise me that the speed of light can be manipulated and boosted since speed tests over the last 200 years have shown that the speed of light has been natuarally slowing down.
Although the difference has been only a few hundred miles per hour of the approximately 300,000km per hour it now travels, this is something to ponder.
The following quote appears in the article:
"For the time being, this is the only violation of special relativity that I know of."
Interresting. I am aware of several FTL violations in the last 5 or so years - including *information* being sent FTL. I'll presume this scientist is burried in work and is simply not aware.
To my understanding: I point out that Einstein indicated that INFORMATION could not go FTL - everything else could. Obviously, he was not completely correct, regardless.
FYI: Light has been slowed to a literal crawl and even "frozen" - search terms would include "liquid light" and "cesium gas".
By the way, How about Interstellar Travel ?
Dr. Steve Schaefer, Ph.D. Princeton University (Physics), "Calculates if X = 4.3 light-years, then T = 3.6 years. Dozens of stars could be reached in five to six years. In fact, a traveler could even go the Andromeda galaxy (2,000,000 light years) in under 29 years (Ship Time in Years) if a constant acceleration could be maintained." Also see Dr. Carlos I. Calle, PhD, NASA senior research scientist, below on page.
http://nlspropulsion.net/default.aspx
I'm not sure where you get that information from, as it appears that you are breaking Einstein's SR too! It is constant (apparently), but maybe you are referring to the accuracy in the measurement of it that has changed, not the actual light itself? Otherwise it would eventually grind to a halt!
Regardless, assuming it should be constant in this experiment, then, yes, they are violating SR. However, SR doesn't take into account Quantum mechanics as it assumes light is a particle, and thus ignores Heisenburgs uncertainty & also quantum tunelling, and thus maybe he does need to rewrite the SR theory to take into account uncertainty. Who knows...after all, we thought Newton had sown up the laws of mechanics until Einstein came along...
Surely if 'something' travels faster than light, even if it is just one single photon, then that can be used for information?
EM Tunneling through a solid block of lead:
When this experiment was first shown to the scientific community by it's creator, the response from a "rival" scientist was, I paraphrase:
"Yes, you have sent energy faster than light. But Einstein only said information can't go faster than light."
The reply to this constructive criticism was the transmission of classical music at FTL.
This is what I can tell you about this experiment.
Now, you are correct that a single photon can contain 'information', however, we are not too good (yet) at modulating and demodulating quanta.
"The reply to this constructive criticism was the transmission of classical music at FTL."
If you're referring to the experiments Professor Nimtz did at the U of Cologne, sending Mozart via microwave tunnelling, then they in no way contract special relativity (and I don't believe Prof Nimtz claims that they do). As far as I'm aware, no tunnelling experiment has shown >c, nor would it be expectd to, for information or energy. Group and phase velocity _can_ be >c, as SR allows, but can't be used to transfer anything useful.
The speed of light isn't an arbitrary, mysterious limitation. It's part of the geometry of space and time. You can no more go >c than you can go from London to Edinburgh in 40 miles rather than 400 (unless you fold the British Isles with the crease somewhere near Manchester - the analogy in physics is then the wormhole theory, which doesn't break c but does bypass it).
The thing that matters for tunnelling experiment velocity measurement - which is by no means an obvious thing - is the wavefront, the first hint that something's coming. In every experiment i know of, wavefront velocity does not contradict SR - but if you have specifics, I'd love to see them.
We're actually very good at modulating quanta! I suggest you look up what's been happening with quantum key distribution and entangled photon pairs, where we use polarisation as our medium. A further exercise to the reader: with quantum key distribution, how do you build a repeater? Could you use tunnelling?