Europe edges closer to mobile phones on planes

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

The likelihood of mobile-phone usage being allowed on flights within Europe increased on Thursday after Ofcom issued a consultation on the matter.

The issue has been brewing for many years but has been hampered until now by concerns over safety and the commercial viability of business models. The regulator's new proposals are the result of negotiations within the European Union, and will therefore cover all European airspace — although what will happen with flights leaving that airspace remains to be seen.

Ofcom is proposing a situation where a mobile base station would be allowed to be installed on a plane. Calls would be routed by satellite, and calls would be treated as if the user was roaming. The revenue would come from a deal between the airline and an onboard operator. There are two operators currently able to offer such a service: OnAir and Aeromobile.

According to an Ofcom spokesperson, the drive towards the new proposals has come from OnAir (a joint venture with Airbus and the airline industry body SITA) and Aeromobile (a joint venture between the Norwegian telco Telenor and the transport communications company ARINC), rather than the airlines themselves. However, many airlines including Ryanair, BMI and Air France have previously expressed interest.

As is currently the case, all mobile telephony equipment would need to be switched off during landing and takeoff. It would then be allowed on at a minimum height of 3,000m. The first phase of the service's introduction would enable GSM voice and GPRS data, but it may in future extend to 3G and beyond.

Join the discussion

Talkback

Should mobile-phone usage be allowed on aeroplanes, or is this taking communication too far?

What do you think?+

Ofcom's spokesperson conceded that, despite pan-European agreement and similar moves being undertaken in some other countries including Australia, the service may hit problems when flying over countries without similar regulations.

"Potentially, once the system is up and running, when you fly into other airspace outside the EU you would have to comply with the individual countries' jurisdiction and their regulations," Ofcom's spokesperson said. "If they haven't got the system in place it might be turned off."

The US Federal Aviation Authority ruled earlier this month that it would not allow mobile calls on planes for the foreseeable future. And the Daily Telegraph has launched a campaign against in-flight mobile use.

A spokesperson for British Airways told ZDNet.co.uk on Thursday that the airline "would have to think very carefully about whether or not we want to allow customers to use mobile phones onboard as it could devalue the whole customer experience".

"We will be led by customer feedback," the spokesperson added. "We are in the early stage of research into this matter — both in terms of the technological and regulatory practicality, and also with our customers. We have carried out some preliminary surveying of passengers from our Executive Club. One option, which has been regarded favourably, is texting rather than spoken conversations."

Talkback

Mobile phone usage has been widespread for about ten years now, and people have got used to the fact that they cannot make calls while flying. The global economy has not ground to halt because some merchant banker is unable to phone his secretary to get her to order more velvet toilet paper for his Kensington crash-pad before he touches down in Heathrow. So why do we need this to change?

Everyone has got used to the fact they can't make or receive calls while flying - so why do we need this technology - is it really going to improve the quality of our lives, makes us any more productive or have any real benefits at all? It's just technology for technology sake - with operators and airlines keen to suck more money out of anyone deluded enough about their place in the universe to think they need to be in constant communication 24X7.

Rather than allowing mobile calls on planes - why don't we just bring back smoking instead - that way all the small brained, ADD sufferers who can't go a few hours without making a phone call - can find a more direct way of throwing their money away - they can light little bonfires of cash at the back of the plane - that should keep them amused.

andrewdonoghue 18 October, 2007 14:23
Reply

Hasn't Japan just banned any electronic devices on their planes that can uses any kind of wireless functionality such as a Nintendo DS
<a href="http://uk.gamespot.com/news/show_blog_entry.php?topic_id=25957914&sid=6180299" rel="external">Source: Emma Boyes @ Gamespot News</a>

Just goes to show when there is money to be made Airlines will suddenly not have a problem with devices that "interfere with pilot controls".

It's another case of <a href="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,1000001161,39290010-39001101c-20088122o,00.htm">fear of magic</a> where mobiles were banned at petrol stations for fear they would cause an explosion (disproved by <a href="http://www.skyone.co.uk/brainiac/pgArticle.aspx?articleid=52&pid=1" rel="external">Brainiac </a>. With the planes dropping out of the sky because of mobile phones I seriously doubt through testing has been done - I know that plenty of people never both to switch of their phones on flights - and guess what we didn't spiral out of control.

If Europe pull this off then Japan will look rather silly for being so scared of handhelds.

David Long 19 October, 2007 10:21
Reply

Lufthansa did a study some years back, where it concluded that on average there is more than one phone left on on every flight. And that was then.

I've got two phones now, my personal mobile and the work smartphone, and last time I went to the US I forgot to turn the latter off (I'd shoved it in my hand luggage to get through security, and forgotten it was there). It bleeped as I got off the plane at San Francisco; I dug it out and read the text message that said: "Welcome to T-Mobile Iceland". So not only had it been squonking away for twelve hours, it had managed to log onto a base station from 38000 feet (albeit for just long enough for the system to recognise it, and not long enough to receive the text).

If this WAS a problem, then there wouldn't just be a ban - there'd be mobile phone detectors on board, like smoke detectors. There aren't. It's not a problem.

Rupert Goodwins 19 October, 2007 12:27
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

10 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

13 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

16 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

20 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint