US regulator proposes new net neutrality rules

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

US Federal Communications Commission chairman Julius Genachowski on Monday outlined a plan to keep the internet open.

In a speech given at the Brookings Institute, Genachowski proposed that the FCC turn its four principles of network openness official into regulation. And he suggested that the FCC add two more "principles" as part of these new rules.

According to the existing principles, network operators cannot prevent users from accessing lawful internet content, applications and services of their choice, nor can they prohibit users from attaching non-harmful devices to the network.

Now Genachowski is proposing two new principles. The first would prevent internet-access providers from discriminating against particular internet content or applications, while allowing for reasonable network management. The second principle would ensure internet-access providers are transparent about the network management practices they implement.

Genachowski tried to alleviate fears that the FCC will overstep its bounds and create rules that hamper innovation.

"I am convinced that there are few goals more essential in the communications landscape than preserving and maintaining an open and robust internet," he said. "I also know that achieving this goal will take an approach that is smart about technology, smart about markets, smart about law and policy, and smart about the lessons of history."

The debate over so-called net neutrality began heating up about three years ago, when congressional leaders first held hearings on potential laws to ensure ISPs could not tamper with traffic.

There is no clear definition of the term 'net neutrality', but in general it refers to the concept that internet users should have unfettered access to content and services. In other words, service providers should not be allowed to either impede or favour access to particular sites or applications.

The discovery that the nation's largest cable operator, Comcast, had slowed down certain kinds of peer-to-peer traffic on its network fanned the flames and sparked public outrage over such practices.

But the fight to create new laws or regulation to protect net neutrality languished after the FCC publicly admonished Comcast for violating its open-internet principles. These principles are not regulation and the FCC is somewhat powerless in imposing any real punishment for violating the rules. Still, the slap on the wrist coupled with public outcry was enough to get Comcast to change its practices.

Getting to 'greater transparency'
Genachowski reasoned that the principles now need to be actual regulation, and that broadband providers need to know the rules of the road and need to know that they must adhere to rules to ensure open access for everyone.

"We cannot afford to rely on happenstance for consumers, businesses and policymakers to learn about changes to the basic functioning of the internet," he said. "Greater transparency will give consumers the confidence of knowing that they're getting the service they've paid for, enable innovators to make their offerings work effectively over the internet, and allow policymakers to ensure that broadband providers are preserving the internet as a level playing field."

Read this

FAQ
FAQ: Why you should care about net neutrality

Despite being guaranteed to raise blood pressures in the US, the network neutrality debate has been slow to migrate across the Atlantic....

Read more +

But large broadband providers such as AT&T, Verizon Communications and Comcast have opposed new regulation or laws protecting net neutrality. They argue that imposing new rules would prevent them from managing their networks. And they also argue it would prevent them from introducing tiered pricing to their service line-up.

Genachowski addressed these issues in his speech. He assured service providers that the FCC would examine violations of these net-neutrality rules case by case. He also said the rules are not intended to prevent network operators from handling congestion on their networks.

Genachowski noted that broadband providers would be able to manage networks when they are congested, and he added that service providers could introduce new tiered services, so long as there is enough internet capacity to allow for open access to the rest of the internet.

"I recognise that if we were to create unduly detailed rules that attempted to address every possible assault on openness, such rules would become outdated quickly," he said. "But saying nothing — and doing nothing — would impose its own form of unacceptable cost."

Genachowski also made it clear that the net neutrality rules he plans to make regulation will be applied to wireless provider, too.

"It is essential that the internet itself remain open, however users reach it," he said. "The principles I've been speaking about apply to the internet however accessed."

Genachowski said the FCC would issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at the its October meeting, adding that the Commission will be seeking input and feedback from anyone interested in contributing to the process of making the rules.

For example, he said, the FCC would be looking for input on how to determine whether network management practices are reasonable, what information broadband providers should disclose about their network management practices and how the rules apply to differing platforms, including mobile internet access services.

As part of the announcement, the FCC launched a new website to encourage public participation.

Talkback

I find this encouraging news - if only because some telecoms industry analysts I speak to are so close to the industry that they are against Net neutrality.

They seem to see Net neutrality as a child-like demand for stuff for free. Why don't we understand that ISPs need to make a profit and the only way they can do that is by prioritising the traffic of those who pay the most - which in the long run is likely to be content providers such as Google, Yahoo, the BBC, and so on. Why would ordinary users be given the same priority as important organisations such as those?

Maybe this will change their minds or, at least, give them pause....

manek 22 September, 2009 11:19
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

50 minutes ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 hour ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

3 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

5 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

6 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

7 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

8 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

10 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

15 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

17 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

17 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

19 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

20 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

20 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

21 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

21 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

22 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

22 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

22 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB