Web giants attack Digital Economy Bill

NEWS

Google, Yahoo, eBay and Facebook have written to Lord Mandelson asking him to remove measures in the Digital Economy Bill, which they say could stifle innovation and derail the government's plans for Digital Britain.

On Wednesday, executives from the European divisions of the internet companies sent the business minister an open letter urging him to remove Clause 17 from the proposed law, which received its second reading in the House of Lords earlier the same day.

"We believe the bill's Clause 17 – which gives any future Secretary of State unprecedented and sweeping powers to amend the Copyright, Design and Patent Act – opens the way for arbitrary measures," the companies wrote. "This power could be used, for example, to introduce additional technical measures or increase monitoring of user data even where no illegal practice has taken place."

The clause, which has already attracted widespread criticism from digital rights activists, ISPs and consumer groups, would give Mandelson or any other nominated person power to amend copyright law as they saw fit, nominally in order to keep up with changes in technology.

The online companies say that this power will introduce business uncertainty and the potential for open-ended compliance costs to the UK's digital economy.

"This would discourage innovation, impose unnecessary costs, potentially unsettling the careful balance of responsibilities for enabling market change which Lord Carter outlined in the Digital Britain report," the letter said.

"This clause is so wide that it could put at risk legitimate consumer use of current technology as well as future developments... Clause 17 creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses and puts at risk the UK's leading position in a digital Europe. We urge you to remove Clause 17 from the bill," the companies wrote.

Responding to the criticism of the clause, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) said that the law must be drafted to include potential changes in technology, so that the government could take action if new ways of infringing copyright were developed.

"However, business will not wake up one morning to a world in which government has taken extensive digital powers," a BIS spokesperson said on Wednesday. "There are substantial constraints on how the power can be used, with requirements for a consultation and votes in both houses of Parliament before anything can happen. Also, the powers can not be used to create or modify a criminal offence."

The Digital Economy Bill was outlined in the Queen's Speech in November, and includes radio spectrum planning and video game classification alongside measures to counter file sharing. It includes 'three strikes' proposals, which would impose stringent data collection rules on ISPs and give Ofcom a central role in disconnecting users deemed to be in breach of intellectual property law.

The Bill had its first reading in the Lords on the 19 November. Now it has had its second reading in the Lords, it will go through committee and report stages prior to a third reading, before being introduced to the House of Commons.

Talkback

it is the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills that stands behind this bill ?

It sounds more like it was coming from one of these:

A: The Ministry of Truth ( as in G. Orwell)

B: Das propaganda Ministerium ( as in Goebbels)

C: Straight from MPAA/RIAA ( so-called media-mafia)

D: Or has Goebbels returned in full ? (NOT likely !)

hkommedal 4 December, 2009 01:54
Reply

"We believe the bill's Clause 17 – which gives any future Secretary of State unprecedented and sweeping powers to amend the Copyright, Design and Patent Act – opens the way for arbitrary measures," the companies wrote. "This power could be used, for example, to introduce additional technical measures or increase monitoring of user data even where no illegal practice has taken place."


You haft to ask whats the motivation behind these company's letter in the first place? couldn't this also be used in the future by others to water this bill down, either way this bill should not be passed at all!

CA 4 December, 2009 04:02
Reply

needs to be changed to:
Unprecedented and sweeping powers to amend the the rights of the PUBLIC against media giants' attemps to lobby for rights they DO NOT HAVE ! They do NOT own us, the public.

Copyrights are privileges granted by society.
Since the holders of these privileges has so blatantly abused the rights of the public, the really need a smack on their fingers in the form of REDUCED rights.
This can not happen too soon.

hkommedal 4 December, 2009 04:30
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Tony Douglas

Please God no; teach them anything you like - thinking rationally, the uses and misuses of data, what data is and what it's not - but leave the...

2 hours ago by Tony Douglas via Facebook on Kids are the future. Teach ’em to code.
BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

16 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

19 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

22 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

3 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

3 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

3 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint