Intel debuts higher-speed Celeron

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
The first Y2K microprocessor is ... a Celeron. Intel introduced Tuesday a 533MHz Celeron processor for value-priced desktop PCs. The chip, available now, offers PC users additional performance at little extra cost. A number of PC makers are expected to offer it in their machines. It is also a turning point for Intel. The new chip is an extension of Intel's current Celeron processor line, meaning it is manufactured using Intel's 0.25 micron process and features 128KB of integrated Level 2 cache and a 66MHz system bus. But it's the last such chip before the company moves Celeron to its 0.18 micron manufacturing process, which is now used for the Pentium III. The process change will bring additional performance "headroom" to Celeron, meaning Intel will be able to raise the clock speed of the chip over the next few quarters, while it lowers cost, because the process also yields a greater number of chips. Headroom will be the key to staving off competition, Intel says. The company is battling a resurgence by Advanced Micro Devices, whose K6-2 chip is popular in value-priced computers. AMD is already shipping a 533MHz K6-2 chip, announced last November, along with its 750MHz Athlon processor. It has plans to deliver higher clock speed K6-2s as well. "We're not going to sit on our laurels in 2000. We're going to keep our foot on the gas pedal," said Pat Gelsinger, vice president and general manager of Intel's Desktop Products Group. "We've lined up our products so that we can keep introducing them to be proactive in this space. We want to have the products at volume sweet spots at or ahead of the competition." Those sweet spots, in general, are PCs sold at retail or direct to consumers at $600 (£360), $800 and $1,000 price points. "In the Pentium space, it's 'run as fast as you can,' " Gelsinger said. However, "In the value space it's different. The customers aren't demanding the best. Instead, you're always trying to provide the best value, which is the right megahertz at the right price points." Intel, in order to keep up with the market, has been introducing new Celeron chips at least once per quarter, starting in the last half of 1999. Early in the year, it introduced chips even more quickly in an attempt to catch up with AMD in market share. "We'd expect to be similar to that in 2000 (with quarterly clock speed upgrades), but we've built our product line so we can be more aggressive. If we need to be more aggressive, we can be," Gelsinger said. Later this quarter Intel will make the transition to the 0.18 micron production process for Celeron chips, sources said. The first will be available at 566MHz, sources said, but will still offer a 66MHz system bus. Intel may not move to a faster 100MHz bus right away, for reasons including controlling Celeron's cost, sources said. While Intel introduces faster Celerons, AMD will also make the transition to 0.18 micron with a new version of the chip, called K6-2+, which will debut at about 550MHz this quarter. Take me to the Intel PIII special

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

4 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

4 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

5 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

7 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

7 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

7 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

7 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

10 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

12 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

12 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

13 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

14 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

15 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

23 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility
txtrainguy

Replying to an old topic that I'm currently facing with my CEO (who is on a Mac). Our servers are primarily Windows Servers, office is about...

1 day ago by txtrainguy on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility