Intel, AMD chop chip prices

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
The processor skirmishes have started again, with Intel and AMD cutting prices on their desktop PC chips. As expected, Intel on Sunday dropped list prices on its Pentium 4 chips by as much as 29 percent. The chipmaker nipped the 2GHz Pentium 4 by 29 percent, from $562 (about £393) to $401 (about £280). It also cut the 1.9GHz Pentium 4 by 27 percent, from $375 to $273, and the 1.8GHz by 12 percent, from $256 to $225. In addition, Intel cut prices on its Pentium III desktop and server chips. It lopped the price of its 1.2GHz Pentium III by 10 percent, to $241; the 1.13GHz Pentium III dropped by 14 percent, to $193; the 1.1GHz was cut by 14 percent, also to $193, and the 1GHz Pentium III fell by 10 percent, to $173. Intel also cut prices on its Pentium III server chips by up to 11 percent and dropped 26 percent off the price of its 2GHz Xeon, which now sells for $415. Prices on Intel's desktop Celerons, mobile processors and the remainder of its Pentium 4 chips were kept the same. Rival chipmaker AMD followed on Monday with price cuts of its own on the Athlon XP family, which debuted earlier this month. AMD made more conservative price moves, dropping the list price of its Athlon XP 1800+ chip from $252 to $223, a 12 percent cut. It also reduced the 1.4GHz Athlon by 4 percent, from $130 to $125. The chipmaker saved its largest cuts, as much as 17 percent, for its desktop Duron chips. The 1.1GHz Duron dropped from $103 to $89, a 14-percent reduction, while the 1GHz was lowered by 17 percent, from $89 to $74. The 950MHz Duron fell from $74 to $69, a 7-percent cut. Prices for the remainder of AMD's chips -- including its Athlon XP 1500+, 1600+ and 1700+ models, Athlon MP and Athlon 4 mobile chips -- were kept the same. However, resellers last week reported at least some drop in Athlon XP prices, with street prices on the 1700+ hovering between $164 and $167. Meanwhile, the 1600+ was selling for between $139 and $143 and the 1500+ was selling for between $122 and $129, suggesting that, as has been the case in the past, resellers who buy the largest quantities are enjoying deeper discounts even on the chips whose price did not change. The three chips list for $190, $160 and $130, respectively. Because of an excess supply of most processors, both distributors and dealers have been cutting their prices in advance of the official price cuts. In addition, AMD sells its chips to large distributors and PC makers at discounts well below the "official" price. As a result, AMD chips typically sell for less than the posted price. The price cuts aren't as steep as the discounts that occurred in August. Instead, the cuts may be calculated to create room on the price lists of both companies for upcoming products. AMD, for example, plans to introduce a 1900+ Athlon during the quarter. The chip will run at 1.6GHz and likely outperform the 2GHz Pentium 4. For its part, Intel plans to come out with a 2.2GHz Pentium 4 in early January, code-named Northwood, that will contain a performance-enhancing secondary cache with 512KB of memory. Currently, the Pentium 4 comes with a 256KB secondary cache. More price cuts will likely follow the introduction of Northwood because the chip is smaller than current Pentium 4s, a factor that lowers manufacturing costs. Analysts say that lower prices could help out the limping PC market. "People aren't feeling as rich as before," said Dan Niles, an analyst at Lehman Brothers. AMD and Intel have been duelling over prices throughout 2001. AMD's market share jumped to 21 percent in the first quarter from 17 percent in the previous quarter -- its quickest acceleration since 1999. In April, Intel retaliated with scorched-earth prices on the Pentium 4. Besides helping the company gain market share back from AMD, Intel said in March that price cuts would also allow the Pentium 4 to replace the Pentium III inside desktops by the end of the year. Although the chip reductions have led to cheaper prices on performance PCs, both companies have felt an effect on the bottom line. AMD enjoyed profits in the first half but reported a net loss of $190m in the third quarter and is in danger of ending up in the red for the entire year. AMD achieved an annual profit in 2000. Before that, its last annual profit came in 1995. Similarly, Intel has seen its revenue and profits slide. In the third quarter, earnings dropped from $2.89bn to $655m in the same period a year ago -- a whopping 77 percent decline. Meanwhile, revenue in the quarter declined 25 percent to $6.5bn, compared with the year-ago quarter. See Chips Central for the latest headlines on processors and semiconductors. See the Hardware News Section for full coverage. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Chips Central forum Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

12 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

15 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

18 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

22 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

1 day ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 days ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 days ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

3 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint