Itanium 2 shrinks to fit

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Itanium 2, Intel's upcoming chip for high-end servers and workstations, has slimmed down. The final version of the chip, which goes on sale in a few weeks, will have a surface area of 421 square millimetres -- approximately 10 percent smaller than originally planned. The reduction in size comes because of subsequent manufacturing improvements, an Intel representative said. Although it remains a relatively large processor, the slimmed-down chip will give Intel a little extra breathing room on costs and manufacturing. In February, Intel representatives said the chip would measure 464 square millimetres, which would have made it one of the largest chips in years. Large chips cost more to make because fewer can be carved out of a single wafer. Yields -- the number of good chips produced from a wafer -- also typically decline as chip size increases because of a greater potential for defects, according to analysts. "Dropping a few additional square millimetres will up yields in both die size and defect density," said Dean McCarron, principal analyst at consulting firm Mercury Research. Itanium 2, which once went by the code-name McKinley, is perhaps Intel's most crucial product release this year. The chip processes data in 64-bit chunks, like IBM's Power4 and Sun Microsystems' UltraSparc III. Other Intel chips, including the Xeon processor line for servers, consume data in 32-bit chunks. Among other performance benefits, 64-bit chips let server manufacturers incorporate far more memory into their machines, which is crucial for running large databases. Naturally, 64-bit chips and servers sell for far more than their 32-bit counterparts. The first Itanium chip, though, has been a commercial dud. Delayed several times, the processor found few takers among computer manufacturers or corporate buyers. Middling performance, a lack of software and a declining economy also hurt Itanium, according to executives and analysts. Intel and others, though, assert that the experience with Itanium 2 will be different. The chip will provide twice the performance of the first Itanium, according to Intel. IBM, Hewlett-Packard, NEC and other manufacturers have also invested heavily to develop servers, chipsets and other technology for Itanium 2 servers. A greater number of operating systems and databases will also be appearing around the time the Itanium 2 comes out. Demand "has been picking up, but we're still talking tens of thousands of units," or substantially less than the Xeon line, said McCarron. The chip, originally due in 2001, is likely to debut shortly after 14 July. HP is coming out with a version of Unix for the chip in the third week of July, which begins on that day. Intel has said the chip is due midyear. If the chip finds buyers, Intel, in tandem with server makers, will be able to snatch customers away from Sun and potentially grab the lead position in every segment of the processor market. But Intel also faces competition from Advanced Micro Devices in the server field. Intel's cross-freeway rival is coming out with a server chip called Opteron next year that can handle both 32-bit and 64-bit software and will cost less to manufacture, according to AMD. Until recently, AMD did not participate in the server market. Sizing it up
The size of the Itanium 2 is the result of a number of factors. The chip, which is made on the 180-nanometre manufacturing process, contains a substantial amount of cache -- data reservoirs near the processor for rapid access. Intel is integrating a 3MB Level 3 cache, a 256KB Level 2 cache and a 32KB Level 1 cache. The original Itanium features a 4MB Level 3 cache, although it's located on separate chips, and a 96KB Level 2 cache. Itanium 2 also contains more internal subsystems than its predecessor. In all, the chip contains 221 million transistors. The chip will run at 1GHz when it debuts. Although it is only coming to market now, successors are already in the works. In 2003, the company will unveil Madison, a "shrink" of the Itanium 2 made on the more advanced 130-nanometre manufacturing process. Though smaller, Madison will be based on the same design as the Itanium 2. Deerfield, a low-power, cheaper Itanium chip, is also on the horizon. In 2004, Intel expects to come out with Montecito, the successor to Madison, and follow it in the 2005 to 2006 time frame with Chivano, Montecito's successor, according to sources.
See Chips Central for the latest headlines on processors and semiconductors. Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Chips Central Forum. Let the Chips Central editor know what you think by email. And sign up for the weekly Chips Central newsletter.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

4 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

6 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

6 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

7 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

8 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

9 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

9 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

10 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

10 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

11 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

11 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

11 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

14 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

15 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

15 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

16 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

18 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
Marcus Karlsson

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

19 hours ago by Marcus Karlsson via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

1 day ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility