Centrally managed antivirus software

ANALYSIS
For the small or home office user, retail antivirus programs such Norton AntiVirus 2003, McAfee VirusScan 7.0, and F-Secure Anti-Virus Personal Edition offer adequate protection and are easily managed. But for the enterprise tech with dozens or even thousands of PCs to protect, such products require too much oversight and place too much control with the end user. To resolve this dilemma, enterprises often choose a centrally managed antivirus solution. The most well-known providers of centrally managed antivirus software are Symantec (Norton), McAfee, and F-Secure. These companies each offer enterprise solutions that can be maintained by one or more techs with little to no end-user intervention. Although each product offers a unique set of features, they all share the advantages and disadvantages common to centralised antivirus solutions. Before you recommend such a solution to your boss, however, you should be familiar with these common characteristics. Reduce network traffic and administration time
Most virus signature/definition files are somewhere between 1 MB and 2 MB. Not a bad download for one machine to handle, but with just 50 machines, that number jumps to between 50 MB and 100 MB. In addition, stand-alone antivirus programs often require each computer to have an Internet connection. This means opening a port in your firewall (if you have one) for all machines and downloading the same data repeatedly. With a centrally managed antivirus solution, you have the benefit of downloading the virus signatures/definitions and software updates to a single server, thus requiring only one machine to be connected to the Internet on that port. Once the update files are downloaded, the PCs can then pull them from the server and not the Internet. This is an attractive solution for organisations with limited Internet bandwidth or organisations that don't provide an Internet connection for every PC. Not only can centrally managed antivirus solutions reduce network traffic, but they can also significantly reduce the time techs spend on managing the antivirus system and troubleshooting end-user problems related to antivirus software. Asking end users to regularly update their antivirus software can be tiresome at best and downright dangerous at worst. I know of help desks that routinely e-mail end users, reminding them to update their antivirus software, only to be flooded with a wave of "How do I do that?" questions. Worst yet, many end users simply ignore the e-mails altogether. Some IT organisations use login scripts to automate antivirus updates, but this too is often fraught with difficulty as users can close the script's command window without letting the task complete. Because centrally managed antivirus software often runs quietly in the background, no end-user intervention is required, nor does the end user realise the process is occurring. Simply set your organisation's update schedule and let the software do the work. A single point of failure
Despite their advantages, centrally managed antivirus solutions are not without drawbacks. Because such systems store the virus signature/definition files in a single location -- usually a network server -- this server becomes a single point of failure for the entire system. If the server crashes, all workstations will be without a way to update their virus signatures -- unless each machine has an Internet connection. Timing your updates is also an important consideration with a centrally managed solution. Because new viruses are being continuously discovered, virus updates are sometimes released on an irregular basis. This can cause a problem if your organisation doesn't use a fairly frequent update schedule. Let's say your system updates all PCs on Monday, but a new virus was discovered on Wednesday. In this scenario, your PCs wouldn't have the updates required to combat this new threat. This illustrates that although centrally managed antivirus systems can reduce administration time, they don't eliminate administration altogether. When a new virus is discovered and an update is released, you should quickly determine whether the virus poses a threat to the organisation and, if it does, download the most recent updates and then push those updates to the PCs. Unfortunately, this isn't always possible. Pull rather than push
One of the inherent limitations of the many centrally managed antivirus solutions is that virus updates and changes are typically performed on a "pull" rather than a "push" basis. What this means for the IT department is that changes made to the centralised system require the workstation to check in on its own timetable for the updates rather than the server notifying all workstations that there are changes that need to be downloaded. In the case above, this would mean that some workstations would be vulnerable to a new virus for several days. The other option is to configure the workstations to "check in" with the update server on a more regular basis, anywhere from once to multiple times a day. But be aware that this solution can create enough traffic to degrade your network's performance, depending on its capacity. Benefits far outweigh drawbacks
Overall, a centrally managed antivirus system is, in my opinion, something that no enterprise can afford to be without. While the drawbacks can seem troublesome, they are greatly outweighed by an increase in security and a reduction in network traffic and administration time.
For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the
Enterpise newsletter. Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our
Guided Tour. Tell us what you think in the
Enterprise Mailroom.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

3 minutes ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

4 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

4 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

5 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

7 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

7 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

7 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

7 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

10 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

12 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

12 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

13 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

14 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

15 hours ago by via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

23 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility