Check RAM when a Windows install fails

ANALYSIS
Having performed more Windows installs than I care to admit, installation errors are old hat. And in my experience, a hard drive issue, Windows hardware compatibility problem, licensing crisis, or a corrupt installation file is usually the culprit. But I recently encountered an installation error that illustrates how a seemingly unrelated hardware problem can derail a Windows installation. Here's what happened. A simple installation gone bad
A friend of mine called me about a problem he was having with his laptop -- isn't that always the way when you're in IT? He was trying to install Windows 2000 on a Compaq Armada M700 laptop that he had just purchased through an online auction. This machine was a 500-MHz Pentium III with 576 MB of RAM (64 MB onboard and two new 256 MB chips) and a brand new IBM/Hitachi Travelstar 12-GB hard drive (IBM Storage Technology merged with Hitachi Storage in 2003 to become Hitachi Global Storage Technologies). My friend had purchased the hard drive and RAM separately from the laptop -- the hard drive he purchased from another online auction, and the memory he had purchased from a local computer shop. When he inserted his Windows 2000 Professional CD into the CD-ROM drive, the Windows 2000 installation started and reached the screen that states "Setup is inspecting your computer's hardware configuration." Suddenly, the following error message would appear "An unexpected error (-1) occurred at line 1562 in D:\nt\private\ntos\boot\setup\arcdisp.c. Press any key to continue." Needless to say, pressing any key did nothing, and he promptly called me in for a quick look. It's often the ones you never suspect
Upon seeing the error, my first thought was a hard drive issue. Perhaps the drive was partitioned or formatted incorrectly. Using a Windows 98 boot disk, I repartitioned the drive using Fdisk and reformatted using Format. But the error message reappeared. At this point I was stumped and began to search the Microsoft Knowledge Base. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to locate any information on this particular error message or any similar installation problems. The closest I came was finding mention of a potential problem with Windows 2000 Setup and LS-120 drives. Although this laptop had one, it wasn't being used for the installation. Still suspecting the hard drive, I proceeded to Hitachi's hard drive support site. Although I was unable to find any information about this specific problem, I decided to download Hitachi's Drive Fitness Test (DFT) -- this utility would both test the drive and allow me to erase the drive's boot sector. I performed both operations successfully and then repartitioned and reformatted the drive. But when I tried to install Windows 2000, the error message reappeared. At this point I was beginning to wonder if my friend hadn't purchased a duff machine or hard drive. Not willing to given in, I turned to the Web. I entered the path listed in the error message "D:\nt\private\ntos\boot\setup\arcdisp.c" into my favourite search engine and was quickly rewarded with a link to an online discussion. The person who initiated this discussion was experiencing a very similar installation error with Windows XP. Responses to this discussion suggested two potential causes of my problem -- a lingering FAT16 partition on the drive or a damaged RAM module or slot. Now I was getting somewhere. Since I had already worked with the hard drive, I was fairly certain my problem wasn't related to a partitioning issue. I decided to concentrate on the laptop's two new 256-MB RAM chips. I tried removing the chips one at a time and installing Windows. The error message appeared both times. So I removed both chips -- luckily the laptop has 64 MB of onboard memory -- and what do you know? The installation worked perfectly. According to the discussion posting I located, Windows creates a RAM drive during installation and a faulty chip can cause an error. Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 316400 addresses this problem with Windows XP. A happy ending -- sort of
With the Windows 2000 installation problem solved, I turned my attention to the RAM chips. Faulty RAM chips aren't an uncommon occurrence, but I thought the odds were a bit high that two brand new chips from the same retailer would both be bad. So I did a little more research and discovered the chips my friend had purchased were incompatible with his laptop. I believe the chips were ECC, PC133 SDRAM, but it was hard to tell from just the chip. I advised him to promptly return the chips to the local computer store where he purchased them and ask specifically for non-parity, PC100 SDRAM. Since the store's tech had recommended and installed incompatible RAM I assumed they would be happy to make the replacement. I was wrong. The tech told my friend that these chips were the only laptop RAM they carried and he would not replace them. Furthermore, if my friend wanted to return the chips, the tech told my friend he would need to pay a 15 percent restocking fee. My friend was furious, but he had few options. He begrudgingly returned the chips, paid the restocking fee, and ordered new chips from a reputable online memory retailer. Case closed.
For a weekly round-up of the enterprise IT news, sign up for the
Enterpise newsletter. Find out what's where in the new Tech Update with our
Guided Tour. Tell us what you think in the
Enterprise Mailroom.

Talkback

This was the solution to my "unexpected error" during a windows xp installation with a new harddrive. RAM had been removed and installed once. Cleaned it and installed it again and the installation proceeded. No one else could help with this problem. Thanks.

via Facebook 11 September, 2005 15:33
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

3 minutes ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

4 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

4 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

5 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

6 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

7 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

7 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

7 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

7 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
45283

I think WinRT is fantastic. I just wish it was an option for people that didn't want to go through Microsoft's App Store with its attendant...

10 hours ago by 45283 on Why Windows 8 needs architectural hygiene for WOA
Burn-IT

Nine people? £30m? Who's back pocket is that lot going in? And IF they say it is for new buildings, what about all the ones the government has...

12 hours ago by Burn-IT on Police set to launch three £30m e-crime hubs
ewallace

Just to be clear, nobody knows what is in the text of ACTA, here is a photograph of the text of ACTA http://twitpic.com/8h9iju as submitted to the...

12 hours ago by ewallace on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions
fgvrg56

Unfortunately main issue is that ASUS is refusing to accept that they make some mistake on this version of asus Transformer prime. 1 - GPS sensor...

13 hours ago by fgvrg56 on Asus Eee Pad Transformer Prime Wi-Fi & GPS problems?
Ben Woods

@Marcus A fair question. Just talked with Archos which said it was working on an announcement for next week....

14 hours ago by Ben Woods on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule

Any update on this, considering the claimed "first week of February"?

15 hours ago by via Facebook on Archos confirms G9 Ice Cream Sandwich update schedule
apexwm

Bill Goodrich : Just as al_langevin pointed out, with Windows Server 2008 there is no Services for Macintosh anymore. It's gone, not available....

23 hours ago by apexwm on Windows Server 2008 drops the ball for Mac compatibility