Watch these factors for VPN performance

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
As virtual private network (VPN) connections thrive, performance joins security and interoperability as a primary concern. If you need to add bandwidth to your VPN connection because of performance issues, how much would you need to achieve a good balance between security and performance? While every situation is different, a good background on what determines VPN performance can help you maximise that performance without compromising security and interoperability. Here, I'll explain how various factors can affect your VPN performance and tell you about some of the options you have for increasing that performance. VPN performance is an increasingly important issue Many of today's VPN products emphasise security and interoperability, with performance a lower priority -- and rightly so. A VPN is usually set up with security as one of the primary goals, and in many cases, VPNs need to be able to interoperate among different vendors, so interoperability is also a key factor. However, performance is becoming more important as VPNs become more prevalent on corporate networks. If your VPN seems slow, or you just want to know how efficient it really is, you have a number of options for improving its performance. Let's look at some of the factors involved. VPN types -- and my test set-up In general, there are two types of VPNs -- remote client VPNs and site-to-site VPNs. A remote client is generally a single PC that uses VPN software to connect to the host network on demand, while a site-to-site VPN is generally a permanent connection between two sites using dedicated networking equipment. A remote client VPN typically supports telecommuters, while the site-to-site variety usually connects office networks. For the purposes of this article, I've set up a remote-client VPN, using Windows 2000 Server with VPN services enabled via Windows 2000's built-in Remote Access Services. On the client side, I'm running a Windows XP Professional workstation over a 1-Mbps DSL connection. This connection uses Point-to-Point Tunnelling Protocol (PPTP) to connect to the central server. My lab network uses Network Address Translation (NAT) to get out over the DSL connection to the Internet. PPTP vs. L2TP While more widely supported than Layer 2 Tunnelling Protocol (L2TP), PPTP is giving way to L2TP as the tunneling protocol of choice because of L2TP's enhanced security features. However, establishing an L2TP VPN is somewhat more complex than setting up a PPTP connection. PPTP-based VPNs may also operate slightly faster because there is less processing involved in encrypting and encapsulating the packets. Under PPTP, the point-to-point protocol (PPP) payload packet is encapsulated inside a generic routing encapsulation (GRE) packet, which is then encapsulated inside an IP packet to which the data link header is attached. The packet is then sent across the tunnel. Under L2TP, packets are encapsulated no fewer than four times and as many as six times, depending on the IPSec policy being used. Each time a packet is processed, overhead is added to the overall procedure, resulting in higher latency. I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that L2TP provides additional levels of security through the use of DES and 3DES encryption as well as data authentication. However, if you're looking at a VPN from a strict standpoint of performance, L2TP may not be the best choice. One point worth mentioning is the fact that PPTP relies on the TCP protocol, while L2TP uses UDP for typical communication. This can result in slightly lower performance capabilities for PPTP. Bear in mind, though, that since PPTP uses fewer levels of encapsulation, the total message size is smaller than with L2TP, which would tend to cancel this advantage. What kind of VPN are you using? The topology of your VPN can also have a significant impact on its performance and can vary widely among the remote devices. If you're supporting a site-to-site VPN that connects two different remote offices, it's likely that both ends use dedicated equipment configured for a permanent VPN tunnel. If your VPN performance seems slow, you may need to increase the size of the tunnel by adding bandwidth at both ends. You might also be able to change configuration options to increase performance. For example, if your tunnel allows a maximum of 50 users but all 50 of them don't need to use it all day long, you can decrease the maximum number of clients allowed to preserve bandwidth. You can also use traffic monitoring software to determine the type of traffic that is traversing the VPN. You'll need to place a system running such software between your users and the VPN, since the VPN traffic is likely to be encrypted.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Thomas Gellhaus

I also installed the KDE version; I also will probably try out razorqt since I really haven't had a chance to before. I'm looking forward to the...

3 hours ago by Thomas Gellhaus via Facebook on Mageia 2 Released
francisabigail

Acquiring when reinvention/cannibalization is too challenging for a large organization can be an excellent strategy- still, so many mergers stumble...

6 hours ago by francisabigail on Ariba buy parks SAP on Oracle's cloud turf
apexwm

All of the feedback regarding using a touch monitor for a desktop PC is right on. Several months ago, we installed a "demo" multitouch all-in-one...

11 hours ago by apexwm on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
191706

anyone wanting to triple boot *their* own Mac

12 hours ago by 191706 on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
SoapyTablet

Cont.. Biggest Bugbear: Win7's stop-animate-go approach to work, you develop a staggered (not in the above alchohol sense of the word) approach to...

12 hours ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
SoapyTablet

Ah the joys of Windows 8 Consumer Preview... If Windows 7 was 'Vista with Lipstick', whats Windows 8? Vista with Lipstick, the morning after?...

12 hours ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
daveveej

Though the metro look is quite cool on the windows mobile platform I think that think that microsoft ARE MESSING THINGS UP because what has they...

13 hours ago by daveveej on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Custonian

I agree, we have a few touch screen monitors in work but as Windows7 and the applications we use are not touch screen friendly (the size of the...

13 hours ago by Custonian on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
archerthom

I find it amusing that Microsoft added the mouse, which was deemed awkward, but people were forced to use it so it stuck, and now they're saying,...

15 hours ago by archerthom on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
BrownieBoy

Agree with other comments. Nobody's going to start reaching out to start tapping their desktop monitors with their fingers. Their arms would tire...

1 day ago by BrownieBoy on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Random_Error

The only way a touch monitor would be any good is if it were horizontal on the desk, with a virtual keyboard so you could do away with that as well...

1 day ago by Random_Error on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
JBDragon

This is just dumb! Forget that I think Windows 8 will bomb, but really, people are going to go out and buy touch Monitors now??? Just pretend...

1 day ago by JBDragon on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jake Rayson

@Andy Bolstridge > Unfortunately, we need the majority to work 9-5 And therein lies the lie. I work very hard indeed for my idleness, early starts...

1 day ago by Jake Rayson on The Idle Self-employed
Burn-IT

What happens when one hosting platform "acquires data" from another? If I forced the first one to remove it, who is responsible for chasing the...

2 days ago by Burn-IT on Google picks holes in EU's 'right to be forgotten'
JohnTalich

iSpring Pro is a nice tool, that allows PowerPoint to SCORM conversion. They also have free tool, that also generates SCORM compliant courses.

2 days ago by JohnTalich on How To Convert PowerPoint To SCORM Compliant Course
aaron.sloman

I think the answer to the question requires a deeper analysis of where the income can come from who else is now competing for it, who else will be...

2 days ago by aaron.sloman on The three big questions about Facebook's IPO
Brent Pieczynski

Your correctness about Government websites not being compliant with their own websites is correct. Most criticism of other people takes so many...

2 days ago by Brent Pieczynski on Privacy watchdog to chase big companies over cookie law
Kelvyn Taylor

802.11ac does promise some tricks to improve range & reliability, but not sure how these will work in practice until I get real products to play...

2 days ago by Kelvyn Taylor via Facebook on Next-generation 802.11ac routers
mrudang009

My wife and I love our new Kindle Fire. It's lightweight, easy to use and has a great interface. The first thing I recommend anyone with a new...

2 days ago by mrudang009 on Waterstones to sell Kindles with in-store offers
mrudang009

It basically unlocks all the Android marketplace apps and unlocks the device. I am one very happy Kindle owner!

2 days ago by mrudang009 on Waterstones to sell Kindles with in-store offers