Remotely control Windows XP from older operating systems

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

ANALYSIS
From a support tech's point of view, one of the most useful new features in Windows XP is the Remote Desktop feature. With it, you can remotely access a Windows XP workstation without having to personally visit the user's desk. Almost everything you can do sitting in front of the machine, you can do from the relative comfort of your cubicle. If there's one major drawback to Remote Desktop, though, it's that you need to be running Windows XP from the machine you're on to access the remote Windows XP workstation. At least, that was a drawback until Microsoft released a version of the Remote Desktop Client for older operating systems. Now, even if you're running an antiquated Windows 95 workstation, you can still remotely access the newest Windows XP workstation or even a Windows XP Tablet PC workstation. What is it and where can I get it?
The Remote Desktop Client ships with every version of Windows XP as a part of XP's Remote Desktop feature. Think of the client and the host versions of Remote Desktop as a mini-version of Terminal Services. The host runs on the machine you want to access, and the client on your desktop. Like VNC or PCAnywhere, Remote Desktop allows you to temporarily take over the host machine, translating mouse movements and keyboard commands from your workstation across the network. Remote Desktop works well, but as shipped, it works only with Windows XP workstations. If your workstation runs any other version of Windows, you're out of luck. If you need to access the host system, you either have to physically go to the machine or rely on a non-Microsoft solution like VNC or PCAnywhere. To solve this problem, Microsoft released a version of the Remote Desktop client that runs on Windows 2000 Professional, as well as comparatively ancient operating systems like Windows NT Workstation, Windows 98, and Windows 95. You can obtain the Remote Desktop Client from Microsoft's Download Centre. The file you need to download, Msrdpcli.exe, is only 3.4MB, so it won't take very long to download. This file is also the installer for the client, so you can either save it to a temporary directory on your workstation or just run the file directly from the Web site. Installation and configuration
If you don't open the file directly from the Web site, you must double-click the Msrdpcli.exe file to install the client. This begins a Microsoft Installer-based wizard that is fairly simple to use. Just click your way through the wizard. There's only one potential gotcha and that's when you get to the Customer Information screen on a Windows 2000 Professional or Windows NT Workstation computer. On this screen, you can choose to have the Installer allow the program to be available only to the user ID you've logged into your computer with or to all logged-in users. My recommendation is to make it available to all logged-in users. After you've installed the Remote Desktop client, you can start it by clicking Start | Programs | Accessories | Communications | Remote Desktop Connection. When you do, you'll see the Remote Desktop Connection screen shown in Figure A.

Figure A

    You can run the Remote Desktop client on just about any version of Windows.

Talkback

I am really just a home user with a need to have two connections at the same time, 1 local and 1 remote -or- 2 remote. My wife and I use the Remote Desktop a lot when we are away from home, however, there are times when she is at home using the computer and I am at work and need to access a file from our home computer. She doesn't like getting kicked off when I log in. We would find it extremely useful if XP Pro supported two users at the same time.

I know that it is possible to set up a Terminal Server using Server 2003, but that is probably too costly for our needs. Is there any possibility that Microsoft will have some sort of "Terminal Server-Lite" for XP Pro and allow either 1 local user and 1 remote user -or- 2 remote users?

I understand that they need to keep their products differentiated in order to encourage people to buy the right product for their needs, but maybe by only supporting two simultaneous users, they will still leave the market wide open for Server 2003.

via Facebook 11 October, 2003 06:24
Reply

I just thought of this compromise to support two simultaneous users:

If Microsoft felt generous, they could build in two licenses to XP Pro for remote/local use for free. Or, they could SELL, for an additional $49.99, the option to have two simultaneous users. If they only allowed a total of two simultaneous sessions on each machine, they would not even touch their server market, while appeasing thousands of home users.

This optional license add-on would also solve the single user limitation that plagues the “Smart Display” devices (Mira), but that’s another story.

via Facebook 13 October, 2003 15:56
Reply

This post has been removed by a moderator.

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Thomas Gellhaus

I also installed the KDE version; I also will probably try out razorqt since I really haven't had a chance to before. I'm looking forward to the...

3 hours ago by Thomas Gellhaus via Facebook on Mageia 2 Released
francisabigail

Acquiring when reinvention/cannibalization is too challenging for a large organization can be an excellent strategy- still, so many mergers stumble...

6 hours ago by francisabigail on Ariba buy parks SAP on Oracle's cloud turf
apexwm

All of the feedback regarding using a touch monitor for a desktop PC is right on. Several months ago, we installed a "demo" multitouch all-in-one...

11 hours ago by apexwm on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
191706

anyone wanting to triple boot *their* own Mac

12 hours ago by 191706 on xTreme Triple Booting: Linux, Mac & Windows
SoapyTablet

Cont.. Biggest Bugbear: Win7's stop-animate-go approach to work, you develop a staggered (not in the above alchohol sense of the word) approach to...

12 hours ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
SoapyTablet

Ah the joys of Windows 8 Consumer Preview... If Windows 7 was 'Vista with Lipstick', whats Windows 8? Vista with Lipstick, the morning after?...

12 hours ago by SoapyTablet on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
daveveej

Though the metro look is quite cool on the windows mobile platform I think that think that microsoft ARE MESSING THINGS UP because what has they...

13 hours ago by daveveej on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Custonian

I agree, we have a few touch screen monitors in work but as Windows7 and the applications we use are not touch screen friendly (the size of the...

13 hours ago by Custonian on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
archerthom

I find it amusing that Microsoft added the mouse, which was deemed awkward, but people were forced to use it so it stuck, and now they're saying,...

16 hours ago by archerthom on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
BrownieBoy

Agree with other comments. Nobody's going to start reaching out to start tapping their desktop monitors with their fingers. Their arms would tire...

1 day ago by BrownieBoy on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Random_Error

The only way a touch monitor would be any good is if it were horizontal on the desk, with a virtual keyboard so you could do away with that as well...

1 day ago by Random_Error on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
JBDragon

This is just dumb! Forget that I think Windows 8 will bomb, but really, people are going to go out and buy touch Monitors now??? Just pretend...

1 day ago by JBDragon on Windows 8 could speed multi-monitor uptake
Jake Rayson

@Andy Bolstridge > Unfortunately, we need the majority to work 9-5 And therein lies the lie. I work very hard indeed for my idleness, early starts...

1 day ago by Jake Rayson on The Idle Self-employed
Burn-IT

What happens when one hosting platform "acquires data" from another? If I forced the first one to remove it, who is responsible for chasing the...

2 days ago by Burn-IT on Google picks holes in EU's 'right to be forgotten'
JohnTalich

iSpring Pro is a nice tool, that allows PowerPoint to SCORM conversion. They also have free tool, that also generates SCORM compliant courses.

2 days ago by JohnTalich on How To Convert PowerPoint To SCORM Compliant Course
aaron.sloman

I think the answer to the question requires a deeper analysis of where the income can come from who else is now competing for it, who else will be...

2 days ago by aaron.sloman on The three big questions about Facebook's IPO
Brent Pieczynski

Your correctness about Government websites not being compliant with their own websites is correct. Most criticism of other people takes so many...

2 days ago by Brent Pieczynski on Privacy watchdog to chase big companies over cookie law
Kelvyn Taylor

802.11ac does promise some tricks to improve range & reliability, but not sure how these will work in practice until I get real products to play...

2 days ago by Kelvyn Taylor via Facebook on Next-generation 802.11ac routers
mrudang009

My wife and I love our new Kindle Fire. It's lightweight, easy to use and has a great interface. The first thing I recommend anyone with a new...

2 days ago by mrudang009 on Waterstones to sell Kindles with in-store offers
mrudang009

It basically unlocks all the Android marketplace apps and unlocks the device. I am one very happy Kindle owner!

2 days ago by mrudang009 on Waterstones to sell Kindles with in-store offers