Government rules out wider spam protection - for now

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
The government has ruled out changing Britain's anti-spam laws to protect businesses anytime soon, despite its own research finding that the majority of UK firms are expecting a rising tide of unsolicited email.

But, said the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), although there are no plans at present to make it an offence to spam a British business email address, this could change if enough companies lobby for it. "Legislation that we brought in last year needs to bed in a bit," said a DTI spokesman. "We're looking to give it a good run. However, if the majority of businesses had huge objections, then we'd have to listen."

This stance comes in the face of the publication of statistics from this year's DTI Information Security Breaches Survey last week, showing that 55 percent of companies surveyed think that spam volumes are rising, while just 10 percent can see a reduction in the amount of junk mail they are receiving.

Laws introduced in late 2003 by the DTI made it illegal to email an unsolicited message to the personal email address of anyone with whom the sender did not already have business relationship. Controversially, the law left corporate addresses open for spamming -- a move that was attacked by organisations such as Spamhaus and the All Party Internet Group (APIG).

The UK business sector may only have itself to blame, though, for this lack of protection.

"Businesses got what they wanted. We ran a consultation before finalising the legislation, and they certainly made their views known. Businesses as a whole did not want to be included," said the DTI spokesman, adding that many firms were afraid of losing business if they could not send adverts for their wares over the Web to potential customers.

Critics of the law in its current form are not giving up. It is understood that some anti-spam campaigners are in discussions with the DTI about widening the law to protect businesses. APIG is also maintaining pressure over the issue.

"Any legitimate interest that businesses have in sending and receiving emails advertising useful products is being drowned by the tide of spam that is washing up in all our mailboxes at present," said Richard Allan MP, joint vice-chairman of APIG.

Allan believes that firms were mistaken in thinking that they want or need the right to spam UK Internet users.

"Unsolicited bulk commercial email is not a workable marketing tool whether directed at personal or business email addresses because of the ease with which the mechanism can be abused. Legitimate businesses in the UK cannot anyway send unsolicited bulk email as it is banned by all the major ISPs in this country under their terms of use," said Allan. "We should now extend the ban on spam to include business email addresses and explain to businesses that the effective way to conduct marketing over the Internet is to develop targeted permission-based strategies."

Even if the government did take this step, the spam problem wouldn't be solved. Most unsolicited emails received in the UK comes from America. If the spammers were unable to operate in the US, they will probably shift to other territories such as China and continue operating.

While some businesses view this prospect with alarm, others are more sanguine.

One in 10 firms interviewed for the Information Security Breaches Survey said spam was a major problem, but a third reported that they are unconcerned about the issue.

Talkback

I'll tell you why the British government is not keen on instigating wider Spam controls cus they are too busy tryin to keep from gettin a darn good thrashing over imigration and gettin kicked out OUT OUT
they aint worth there weight in used BOG ROLL an thats bieng polite as far as i am concerned "Airy Fairy Blairy" and "Jonny two Jags plus gawd nows how many more locked out of sight bully boy Prescott"

via Facebook 8 April, 2004 11:47
Reply

Government advisers know the cost of spam to industry and commerce. It is much larger than the economic benefits to the spammers (most of whom act illicitly and avoid contributing anything back to the Government by way of taxes.)

Spam wastes bandwith and personnel time - most gets blocked by some will always get through. There is little real benefit from it and the solution is to organise the Internet so it simply cannot happen.

For real, legitmiate opt-in email lists, there are plenty of solutions, such as majordomos that can be used.

via Facebook 30 July, 2004 16:28
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

4 hours ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

7 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

10 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

15 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

24 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint