Sun Microsystems has settled a patent suit brought by Eastman Kodak relating to Java software, agreeing to license Kodak's patents for $92m.
The settlement, announced on Thursday, comes less than a week after a jury in US District Court in western New York ruled in Kodak's favour over accusations that Java violated three Kodak patents. Kodak was seeking more than $1bn in damages.
"The settlement assures customers worldwide that Sun will stand behind its products and intellectual property, and eliminates any uncertainty that could result from a protracted lawsuit and appeal," Sun said in a statement.
Kodak called the settlement agreement "tentative" but said the company achieved its goal to protect its intellectual property. "We are pleased that the court has validated these fundamental Kodak patents, and we now look forward to building a more productive relationship and continued collaboration with Sun," Willy Shih, a Kodak senior vice president, said in a statement.
Kodak spokesman David Lanzillo declined to comment on whether the company planned to sue others over the patents.
Sun isn't the only one selling Java software -- indeed, IBM and BEA Systems have made far more money selling Java infrastructure than Sun has -- but licensees are protected, said Sun spokeswoman May Petry. "The settlement applies to Java-based products under the Java license from Sun," she said.
Sun's payment to Kodak is "quite a far cry from what they were initially claiming" was justified, RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady said. "That has to be counted as a victory of sorts to contain costs."
Licensing deals
The patents which Kodak acquired from Wang Laboratories in 1997 -- cover a method by which a program can ask for help from another program, Lanzillo said.
Most Java backers signed licenses with Sun years ago, but three open-source Java software projects arrived later. JBoss, Geronimo and ObjectWeb have become Java licensees within the last year.
Protection against patent lawsuits wasn't the reason JBoss signed its Java license, but the umbrella is welcome, Chief Executive Marc Fleury said Thursday.
"I'm glad to see this matter resolved, because it's an unstable situation," Fleury said in an interview. "I trust Sun to have done the right thing for Java and of course [to] protect its licensees. Otherwise, it would be really bad for the industry."
Microsoft has software called .Net that's similar to Java. However, the software giant, like Hewlett-Packard and IBM, has licensed Kodak's patents, Lanzillo said.
However, the Kodak patents at issue are very broad and have corresponding implications to the computing industry, Illuminata analyst Jonathan Eunice said in a report this week.
"It is not much of an overstatement, if any at all, to characterise Kodak's patents as claiming the ownership of the entire concept of delegation -- one system or module asking another for assistance executing a task," Eunice said. "The patents reference specific concepts...that are clearly part of Java. But the patents seem to equally describe the execution environment of just about every modern programming language, operating system, (database) engine, messaging broker and application server."
Talkback
You know an OS is a program and a BIOS is a program too. So when the OS calls the BIOS without Eastman Kodak's license this may be a case of patent infringement, right? As such a fundamental methodology was granted to be a patent, there were some serious defects in the US patenting policy.