Hollywood heads to court over movie-swapping

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Hollywood studios are about to take the long-anticipated step of firing a barrage of lawsuits at some of the most prolific Internet pirates, echoing the legal strategy that the recording industry already has used with limited success.

The civil lawsuits, which will be filed against individual movie file-swappers starting 16 November, represent a kind of legal escalation for an industry that fears its films eventually may be shared on the Internet as widely as songs are today.

"Illegal movie trafficking represents the greatest threat to the economic basis of moviemaking in its 110-year history," Dan Glickman, president of the Motion Picture Association of America, said in a statement released on Thursday after a press conference in Los Angeles.

In a follow-up telephone interview, Glickman said he was not prepared to divulge which file-swapping networks would be targeted in the first round of lawsuits. Literature the MPAA distributed lists Kazaa, eDonkey and Gnutella as examples of networks where "illegal digital copies of our member companies' motion pictures" are being traded.

Glickman also would not say whether movie downloaders would be sued, or only those people who make movies available in their shared folders. "We are targeting folks who illegally traffic in these materials," he said. "I'm not going to be more specific."

Until now, the MPAA's member companies were content with a campaign that pressured universities to curb peer-to-peer piracy, sought new laws from Congress, targeted operators of peer-to-peer networks with civil lawsuits, and tried to convince members of the public to visit the RespectCopyrights.org Web site.

But the MPAA's initial legal strategy ran aground in August when a federal appeals court ruled that peer-to-peer network operators such as Grokster and StreamCast Networks -- which runs Morpheus -- could not be held liable for what individual users do. That landmark decision, coupled with the rapid adoption of broadband connections, appears to have prompted the MPAA to target individual users.

MPAA lawyers will rely on the legal playbook invented by the Recording Industry Association of America in its controversial campaign against music pirates. First, the lawyers will record the Internet Protocol addresses of a handful of the most flagrant copyright infringers inhabiting peer-to-peer networks and file what are known as "John Doe" lawsuits, which list a defendant to be named at a later time. Once the civil suits are filed, the lawyers can ask a federal court to order an Internet service provider to unmask the defendant.

Even more than with the recording industry, though, big bucks are at stake in movie piracy. The MPAA estimates that the average cost of making, marketing and distributing a movie is about $143m, and the average number of movies swapped on peer-to-peer networks in the United States each day is between 115,000 and 148,000.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, applauded the movie studios' litigation strategy. "Over 500,000 people are employed by the entertainment industry in California, and it contributes over $30bn annually to our economy," he said. "We cannot let illegal movie piracy continue or it will cripple this important industry and seriously hurt California's economy."

But Public Knowledge, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C., predicted that litigation would not curb movie piracy: "Simply bringing lawsuits against individual infringers will not solve the problem of infringing activity over P2P networks. First and foremost, it is crucial that the motion picture industry develop new business models that treat the low cost, ubiquity and speed of the Internet as an opportunity, not a threat."

Peer-to-peer network watchers have said that trading movies has risen sharply in recent months, as broadband has become more common and file-swapping technologies designed to handle large files efficiently have spread. While movie files tend to be roughly 1,000 times the size of individual song files in MP3 format, higher-speed connections, fatter hard drives and cheaper DVD burners are making it easier to download films online.

A recent survey from network monitoring firm CacheLogic found that BitTorrent, a file-swapping technology used largely to distribute movies, software and TV shows, accounted for more than half of all peer-to-peer network traffic worldwide. CacheLogic, a British analysis firm, estimated that BitTorrent traffic consumes 35 percent of all Internet traffic.

BayTSP, a company that monitors peer-to-peer networks for movie studios and record labels, said that it sees tens of thousands of separate copies of movies online every month. The most popular movie in October was "The Terminal", with about 40,000 copies spread around file-swapping networks, the company said on Thursday.

MPAA's member companies are Buena Vista Pictures Distribution, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Paramount Pictures, Twentieth Century Fox, Universal City Studios and Warner Bros. Entertainment.

CNET News.com's John Borland contributed to this report.

Talkback

Personally I'm getting tired of seeing valid, useful technologies like BitTorrent and other peer-to-peer content distribution technologies tied up in court battles to protect aging, failing "product" distribution models.

It's about time the MPAA and RIAA woke up to the fact that CD's and DVD's are nothing more than media for transporting content, the same way that the internet provides a dynamic transport or a hard drive provides buffering and deferred delivery.

They need to take a much closer look at solutions like Apple's, where license keys are used to manage content distribution. If those keys are associated with a particular user/buyer, they're hardly going to be risking their credit information by handing out their data keys.

Technology has provided some form of every aspect of secure content delivery in standards, in OSS, and in proprietary forms. The media company's refusal to embrace and use those technologies to deliver new business models is their mistake, not that of the technology industry.

Why should companies like Mandrake abandon efficient content distribution solutions and high speed backbones just because the media companies can't or won't "get it?"

via Facebook 5 November, 2004 16:07
Reply

Well I'm entrigued as to how the MPAA will get convictions unless they find the entire film on the alleged wrongdoer's computer, as a partial copy would not play and would not be a complete reproduction of the original. Furthermore people may inadvertently download a copyrighted movie because it was mislabelled on the internet, or vice versa.
Sounds like a good battle coming up for the lawyers.

GS Australia

via Facebook 13 November, 2004 00:59
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

BrownieBoy

@Jack, > Works really well for thieves.... Nice attempt to deflect the argument by tossing in a point that's totally irrelevant, even it were...

1 hour ago by BrownieBoy on AMD Ultrathins to challenge Intel Ultrabooks
bootlegger

Make that 13 people now - I got refused today at Manchester airport. I thought I was up to date on this legislation - I knew of the EU ruling from...

4 hours ago by bootlegger on UK airport body scans will not be opt out
tinycg

Don't forget to check out apps like GoodReader or SlideShark either, they're indispensible for people on the go in presentation situations. Best...

7 hours ago by tinycg on Four top iPad apps for people on the move
TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

12 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

21 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

1 day ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

1 day ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

2 days ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

2 days ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

2 days ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

2 days ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

2 days ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint