A prominent intellectual property lawyer in the open source movement is helping launch a centre to provide free services to developers who use the collaborative programming method.
Eben Moglen, a Columbia University law professor who has represented the Free Software Foundation in legal cases, said that he will help run the new Software Freedom Law Centre, which is set to be announced on Tuesday.
The centre said in a statement that it will employ two full-time intellectual-property attorneys, who will help provide consulting services to non-profit open source organisations. The staff count is expected to expand to four later in 2005. The help they provide could include training lawyers, supporting litigation, dealing with licensing problems and keeping managing contributions to open source projects, the centre said.
"The Law Centre is being established to provide legal services to protect the legitimate rights and interests of free and open source software projects and developers, who often do not have the means to secure the legal services they need," Moglen said in a statement.
An initial $4m to fund the New York-based centre came from Open Source Development Labs, a Linux consortium funded by computing industry giants such as IBM, HP, Intel and others.
Legal issues surrounding copyright and patent law are getting thornier in the open source realm. One start-up, Black Duck Software, sells software to keep open source and proprietary software from intermingling, while another, Open Source Risk Management (OSRM), sells insurance to cover legal costs for companies worried about being sued over using the software.
At the same time, Linux rivals Microsoft and Sun have been touting the legal protections that come with their products.
While there aren't many cases of legal attacks on open source software, the notion of such suits isn't academic. The SCO Group sued AutoZone in 2004, arguing that Linux violates Unix copyrights SCO has claimed. And Microsoft's Steve Ballmer drew public attention to an OSRM study that found Linux could violate as many as 283 patents.
In addition, an HP executive warned in a 2002 memo that Microsoft planned a patent-based attack on open source software. One particular package that it considered as a potential target, according to the HP memo, is Samba, which is software that lets Linux and Unix computers mimic Microsoft Windows' file-sharing and printing behaviour.
Samba and the Free Software Foundation will be the Software Freedom Law Centre's first two clients, the centre said.
Samba has an additional level of legal help. OSDL in January hired Samba creator Andrew Tridgell -- the second person to attain OSDL fellow status after Linux creator Linus Torvalds. A consortium representative said the same $10m legal defence fund that will be used to defend Torvalds from legal attack will extend to Tridgell as well.
Free Software Foundation founder Richard Stallman is working to update the General Public License that governs Linux and hundreds of other open source projects. The law centre said it will help with that work.
Overseeing the Software Freedom Law Centre will be Moglen; Diane Peters, OSDL's general counsel; Daniel Weitzner, the principal research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory; and Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford law professor and author.
Talkback
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IN SOFTWARE MODELS. ONE IS COMMERCIAL AND THE OTHER IS NOT. SOFTWARE THAT IS NOT THAT IS PUT INTO COMPETION WITH THE COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE SHOULD HAVE DIFFERENT RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW. THE WAY THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE NOW WAS A LAW MADE ONLY TO PROTECT BUSINESS AND MONEY MAKING FOR BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT REVENUES THAT ARE A RESULT OF THAT. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MODEL IS WRONG AND THE GOVERNMENT WAS WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE FOR ALLOWING IT. BECAUSE OF THIS INJUSTICE HAS OCCURED TO MANY CONSUMERS DUE TO THE PRESNT BUSINESS MODEL AND ITS LEGAL PROTECTIONS.