Tony Blair will reintroduce the national ID cards bill in the Queen's Speech on Tuesday but a senior government official has admitted that concessions will have to be made to ensure its passage through parliament.
The bill was dropped before the General Election after the government ran out of legislative time to push it through the House of Lords. Then Blair's massively reduced majority in the House of Commons raised questions over whether renewed opposition from rebel Labour MPs and the other political parties would kill the ID cards plan altogether.
But the first hint of concessions to appease opponents came in an interview with Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain at the weekend.
Hain insisted there is still strong public support for ID cards but said Labour's reduced majority will have an impact on any new legislation.
"I think we can now build a consent at the beginning and that will be very healthy for everybody concerned," he said.
Concessions could include a strengthening of the Information Commissioner's powers of scrutiny over the ID card scheme and beefed up protection around which parties have access to the information held in the national identity register that will underpin the ID cards.
That should be enough to appease most of Labour's own MPs who voted against ID cards last time with today's papers reporting Hampstead and Highgate MP Glenda Jackson as saying the rebels won't be trapped into getting into a "virility test" with Blair over the bill.
But the cost of the ID cards plan is still likely to remain a sticking point for other opponents in the Commons, with the Liberal Democrats making a key election campaign pledge to ditch ID cards and put the money into front-line policing.
The latest government figures on the ID cards scheme, as outlined in the Regulatory Impact Assessment by the Home Office put the cost at some £5.5bn over 10 years.






Talkback
I don't care how much it costs and I don't care if they [the governement] want to force it through. It's just based on their track record for IT management i.e. e-Govenment and council websites, I cannot see it a fair move to plough on ahead with something as complicated as ID cards.
Why dont they just move on to chip and pin humans! You can see that is what they would prefer! Then with wifi enabled people and GPS tracking us down, it will stop the need to put people on that anklet thing.
This is just another step away from being free.
One of the big sticking points on ID cards is the ID database the Gov want to keep. This has all the hallmarks of Big Brother. I would prefer to keep my data on a chip card encrypted in segments by the private keys of those who can change the data, encrypted again by a random key which is then encrypted by the public key of those who can read the different segments of data. Maybe this might help the introduction of the ID Card without a Big Brother database. We all hold our own profile, only those with the right private key can read the autorized segment of data only (geat for lost crads) and only when the crad is presnted by the owner (verified by an private key encrypted photo). With the relevant CA structure in place this might just work. BUt I do not think the Gov want this, they could just be after the Database!!!!