France could become the first country to pass a law broadly permitting free downloads of copyright content from the Internet for private use.
In a move that could thwart the entertainment industry's attempts to seek legal sanctions for copyright violations, French Parliament members voted 30 to 28 late Wednesday night to accept an amendment proposing such a move.
Attached to a broader copyright law proposal, the amendment — roughly translated — reads: "Authors cannot forbid the reproductions of works that are made on any format from an online communication service when they are intended to be used privately and when they do not imply commercial means directly or indirectly."
In short, that language could "open the way to the legalisation of peer-to-peer" downloading of copyright music and movies in the nation of about 8 million Net users, Jean-Baptiste Soufron, a legal counsel with the Association of Audionauts, said in a telephone interview with ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com. The French advocacy organisation has represented approximately 100 clients accused of sharing files illegally.
Under French copyright law, there's a concept called "private copy", which permits people to make copies of content for themselves or their friends, Soufron said. But lately, he added, "they're having a huge debate to know if 'private copy' includes downloaded content on the Internet or not".
A French court ruled in favour of the organisation recently, holding that downloaded content for personal use does meet the "private copy" definition, Soufron said. But this amendment would give firmer legal backing in a nation that relies more heavily on codified law than on court precedents, he said.
The Association of Audionauts isn't suggesting that copyright holders go without compensation, Soufron said. It supports pairing the amendment's text with a royalty tax collected from Internet service providers. Those companies would likely raise the money by levying a monthly fee — say, 2 to 5 euros — on customers who engage in a certain amount of downloading and uploading.
The IFPI, a trade association that speaks for the music industry worldwide, said it was "greatly concerned" by the amendment's initial approval.
"Instead of promoting the growth of legitimate music services on the Internet, some of the measures would be extremely detrimental to legal services and to the future of the French cultural industries," the organisation said in a statement provided to CNET News.com.
But IFPI European spokeswoman Francine Cunningham said the proposal doesn't appear to permit unfettered uploading of copyright content. "This distinction is important because the recording industry's ongoing litigation is against major uploaders who are breaking copyright law by making music available to others via the Internet without permission from those who created the music," she said.
Last year, a Canadian judge came to a similar conclusion, ruling it legal to download — but not to upload — copyright content from peer-to-peer services.
The ultimate success of the proposal is far from certain.
French Culture Minister Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres, along with much of the government, supports beefing up the nation's copyright laws significantly, instituting criminal penalties and steep fines for pirates. The official reopened debate on the issue on Thursday, with a second vote expected later in the day.
Even if it survives the Parliament's lower court, it would also have to win approval from its high court, which likely won't consider the measure until late January.
Across the Atlantic, the Motion Picture Association of America on Thursday called the amendment "an unfortunate development". "Most alarming is the apparent disregard for the potential impact on the French cinema industry, which will be hardest hit if this vote is upheld," said Gayle Osterberg, an MPAA vice president. "We are hopeful as this bill works its way through the legislative process, those with an eye toward fostering French cinema will prevail."






Talkback
Yawn, anyone here familiair with existing Dutch laws on this very topic?
ha ha! Vive Le France etc.
Why not legalise shop lifting instead, just giving into thiefs and crooks
Sigh. Totally innocent people are already paying an added price on top of the normal price for various media, like CD-R's, because that's how 'the industry' is getting compensated for personal use copying. But that's not enough. Now 'the industry' also wants extra money for every MP3 player sold because MP3 players are 'illegaly used'. Right, convicted and punished even before you did something wrong and even before you got convicted. You just pay extra for something you might be doing now or maybe in the future. Thank you my political representative for your understanding in these matters.
But still additional laws are asked for so that tax money and government resources can be wasted on tracking down 'crimininals' because 'the industry' can't deliver up on their promise to find the right, root-kit free and otherwise legally sound, copy protection software. Not to mention efforts to get consumers hooked on limited use and otherwise restrictive (hello DRM) sale practices. And there's still the matter of the unusual high selling price and enormous profits made in the entertainment industry alltogether time and time again.
So what's the average Joe to do? Well, let's compare this all with shoplifters. Right, might as well compare them to traffic lights. Thank you for your great understanding in this all. Any other bright ideas? Or can we get a meaningfull discussion here?
Anyone care to take a head-on approach? Like saying that 'the industry' is simply protecting scandalise price schemes based on an outdated business model for years on end?
This is the way we need to go. The sooner 'the industry' realise this the sooner they will start making a profit again...
(then again it may help if they stop spending millions on legal fees a year)