The Advertising Standards Authority has been granted new powers to adjudicate over marketing material that appears on companies' own websites and online social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook.
In addition to the authority's current sanctions, from 1 March 2011 the ASA will be able to remove paid-for search advertisements that link to untruthful advertising communications, which could include traditional online ads, viral videos and other marketing material. However, search engines would have to agree to removing links that are present on their listings.
Funding of the new powers will come from applying a 0.1 percent levy on
paid-for ads that appear on the internet through media and search
agencies. Initially, the funding will be supplemented by seed capital
from Google, the ASA said in a statement on Wednesday.
Apart from the removal of ads and links to ads, measures that could be taken against inappropriate adverts could include the ASA placing its own advertisements highlighting continued non-compliance, or even providing details of the non-compliant material on an ASA micro-site, to which it may make "particular effort to draw public attention".
The new remit, which represents an extension of the current Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) code, came about after the ASA received more than 4,500 complaints about online advertising since 2008, according to ASA chairman, Lord Chris Smith.
"This significant extension of the ASA's remit has the protection of children and consumers at its heart," Smith said in the statement. " From 1 March anyone who has a concern about a marketing communication online will be able to turn to the ASA."
The code is subject to the same existing exclusions that cover editorial and political content, but categories such as 'advergames' — games that are used to promote a product or organisation — which were already covered in the paid-for arena will now include advergames on a company's own website or on social networking sites. Some user-generated content will also fall under the new ASA remit if it is adopted by a website owner and incorporated within marketing communications, regardless of whether the submission of the content was solicited or unsolicited.
A six-month window of grace, leading up to 1 March next year, has been granted to allow companies to get up to speed with the new requirements of the CAP code. It will also allow the CAP and the ASA to conduct training work and raise awareness of the new measures, particularly for online companies that have not previously been subject to regulation.
Talkback
Faux authority.
ASA is a private organization, the publishers sign up to it and voluntarily withdraw adverts that ASA board says are misleading. They do so voluntarily to avoid government legislating.
CAP is what? As far as I can see, it's some faux board funded by the advertising agencies, again for the purpose of avoiding government legislation, but also because the code is crafted by those agencies for their own benefit.
This is not without purpose, the British Board of Film Censorship (now 'Classification'), started out the same way, and when the Mary Whitehouse crowd started screaming in the 1980's, the government turned that faux organisation into a real one by writing the classification requirement into law.
And of course Jacqui Smith, criminalized possession of extreme porn unless it had been rated by BBFC, extending their powers further into criminal law.
So ASA only need to keep the fake front of authority long enough for incompetent MPs to be fooled.