Sobig.F is 'worst variant yet'

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

The latest variant of the Sobig virus has the ability to spread across file-sharing networks as well as by email, making it the worst strain yet, experts warned on Tuesday afternoon.

Click here for help on eradicating the virus.

Email service provider MessageLabs has already detected 60,000 copies of Sobig.F, first spotted earlier on Tuesday. This variant could be one of the more active viruses of the year, said the company, adding that it could hit British computer users particularly hard. A third of viruses detected were in the UK.

According to Alex Shipp, senior antivirus technologist at MessageLabs, Sobig.F is easily the most powerful member of the Sobig family to date. Shipp believes that it has been released by the same virus writer who created the original Sobig, which hit the Internet in January this year.

"He's made a couple of tweaks. Previous Sobigs had a bug where the last letter of the file-name was dropped, which meant the file wouldn’t run. That's now been fixed," explained Shipp.

Another addition to Sobig.F's armoury is the ability to spread across file-sharing networks, Shipp said. He wasn't yet able to say which peer-to-peer applications are affected, but warned that this made Sobig.F a serious threat to home users. Businesses whose employees are running P2P software are also at risk, as this infection route is not normally covered by email scanners, which can otherwise catch Sobig.F.

When spreading by email, Sobig.F appears to have been sent from a recognised domain name, such as ibm.com, zdnet.com or Microsoft.com. The subject line typically says "Re: Details", "Resume" or "Thank you".

Attachment names may include: your_document.pif, details.pif, your_details.pif, thank_you.pif, movie0045.pif, document_Fall.pif, application.pif, and document_9446.pif.

The virus grabs email addresses from several different locations on a computer, including the Windows address book and Internet cache, and sends emails to each one. The virus also forges the source of the message using a randomly selected email address, so that the infected message appears to come from someone else.

Sobig.F is more efficient than previous versions of the virus in sending emails, according to MessageLabs' analysis, because the email engine that it uses is "multi-threaded". While earlier versions of the virus had to wait for a task, or thread, to be completed, Sobig.F can send multiple emails at the same time, making it a much more efficient spam engine.

In an attempt to bypass local antivirus security, the file size varies on each generation by appending rubbish to the end of the file, but is on average around 74Kb in size, according to MessageLabs.

Shipp believes that the email form of Sobig.F poses a greater threat to home users than to businesses, as "many firms will be blocking .pif files already".

Shipp added that the major antivirus firms should already be producing patches to address Sobig.F, and suggested that consumers would be advised to compare notes about how their antivirus protection worked, as some products have been much better than others at catching Sobig variants.

Sobig.E, which emerged in June, attempted to hijack PCs in order to use them to send spam emails. It is thought that Sobig.F does the same, which Shipp believes is proof that the virus writer is working closely with spammers. As most spammers live in the US, the odds are that the virus writer is based there as well, he said.

It's also unlikely that Sobig.F will be the last strain to emerge. "It is programmed to stop on 10 September, but by then there will be another variant out there," predicted Shipp.

CNET Asia staff and CNET News.com's Robert Lemos contributed to this story.

Talkback

Attacks through P2P networks?

Hmm, strange. Can we infer that there might be the hand of a certain group, rabidly opposed to P2P networks because it may negatew their ability to flim-flam musicians forever?

Did that group commisssion the virus writer. Given its penchant for underhanded chicanery, it is certainly worth a thought.

via Facebook 20 August, 2003 16:58
Reply

I believe I have been infected with sobig.F virus. Eventhough, I have never opened a .pif file.

At first, I was submerged with an abnormal amount of email. All of them were coming from a Denmark IP. They all came from different email address although the IP was the same. The message was always the same: "Please see the attached file for details." but the subject could vary and the attached file, always a .pif, could vary also. I have never opened one of these files.

On a second stage, I received a lot of undelivered mail. They were sent with my email address and they contained the virus. How could this be possible if I didn't open the attached .pif file? I believe this virus was (or is still) activated through P2P. I used recently Kazaa and eDonkey or was included in a freeware I recently installed (Foxmail, Hotpop, Mozilla Thunderbird, GRL Real Hidden, iOpus SEA).

I have checked (online scans) with Mcafee (didn't find anything. Online scan and Stinger), Panda (found the infected attachments) and others and I couldn't find any trace of the Sobig.F virus in the registry.

I have the bitter sensation that somebody is taking control of part of my computer.

via Facebook 21 August, 2003 11:55
Reply

If you use the preview pane in Outlook Express, you don't need to open an email to get a virus. Shut off the preview pane and go to your email options/security and check the box that says "Do not allow attachments to be saved or opened that could potentially contain a virus." I also check-mark the box that says "Alert me when other applications try to send mail as me." This (along with a virus scanner and firewall) should protect you from catching and spreading a virus. Keep Windows updated and download all the critical updates!

via Facebook 22 August, 2003 04:46
Reply

The worm uses false e-mail addresses when he copies itself--that is, it looks like it's coming from you, when it actually is stemming off someone elses computer. I had the same thing happen, but if you've checked for the .exe file in your WINNT folder & it isn't there, chances are you don't have it. Especially if you haven't opened a .pif file. Most of the websites I checked said the .pif files must be run manually in order to infect, so the worst effect you should have is a crap load of spam. Check out http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.sobig.f@mm.html for more info. Good luck!

via Facebook 22 August, 2003 15:00
Reply

do you use a preview paine?, not too sure on my facts, but that can preview attachments, hence running the virus.

Chris W

via Facebook 22 August, 2003 22:42
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 hour ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

3 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

5 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

5 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

6 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

8 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

13 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

16 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

16 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

17 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

18 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

19 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

19 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

19 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

20 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

20 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

20 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

20 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

21 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions