New patches close 20 holes in Windows

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
Microsoft released on Tuesday fixes that cover at least 20 Windows flaws, several of which could make versions of the operating system vulnerable to new worms or viruses.

At least six of the flaws could make the OS susceptible to programs similar to the MSBlast worm and its variants, which have infected more than 8 million computers since last August. Another flaw affects a common file used by Internet Explorer, Outlook and Outlook Express and opens the way for the type of virus that executes when PC users click a specially crafted Web link.

The software giant released four patches to cover the 20 security issues, as part of its monthly update schedule. Microsoft wouldn't comment on the level of risk the flaws present, instead maintaining that companies that apply the fixes won't be in danger.

"If you are running a personal firewall, you are at reduced risk from a lot of these vulnerabilities," said Stephen Toulouse, security program manager for the Microsoft Security Response Centre. "But we are absolutely taking this seriously."

The largest patch, MS04-011, fixes at least 14 security flaws. A security hole in the Help and Support Centre affects both Windows 2003 and Windows XP. Another flaw in the Windows Meta File image format could allow an attacker to create a digital picture file that could take control of a Windows NT, 2000 or XP computer. At least six of the 14 flaws could result in a remote user taking control of a Windows computer.

Toulouse said that instead of taking a piecemeal approach, Microsoft waited to release some patches so it could present a more comprehensive set of fixes. "Rather than shipping the same files over three months, we are trying to provide customers one update that has all the fixes," he said.

However, some security researchers took the software giant to task for waiting to release a particular patch that covers many of the flaws. Microsoft's strategy, they said, was keyed more toward public relations than customer convenience.

"These releases confirm a trend that has been happening with Microsoft security lately -- that they are willing to leave customers vulnerable for long periods of time, all in order to try to bundle security fixes, which leads to the [impression] of having less vulnerabilities," said Marc Maiffret, chief hacking officer for eEye Digital Security. "This is completely unacceptable."

eEye Digital Security found six of the flaws that Microsoft reported on Tuesday. The company urged Windows users to update their systems as soon as possible. Maiffret has previously criticised Microsoft for taking as long as 200 days to fix flaws. He said Microsoft took as many as 216 days to fix the latest set of flaws.

Other security researchers were less critical of the software giant.

"You can't generalise that Microsoft takes too long to fix flaws," said Gerhard Eschelbeck, chief technology officer for vulnerability assessment company Qualys. "It depends on where the flaw is in the code."

Qualys found two of the flaws that Microsoft announced on Tuesday. A flaw in a networking code library common to many versions of Windows only took the giant two months to fix, said Eschelbeck. Microsoft had practice, since another flaw had been found in that same library by eEye Digital Security in February.

"A lot of the flaws in this release are derivative of ones that we have seen before," said Qualys' Eschelbeck. "Typically, someone finds a flaw in a particular area and a lot of researchers start looking in that code."

That also happened with the flaw that lead to the MSBlast worm. A second, similar flaw was found in October, but it took Microsoft until now to fix it.

Overall, Eschelbeck believes that the software giant is doing the right thing by releasing a single patch for all the flaws that affect the same software components, rather than quickly releasing the fixes one at a time. Qualys had previously found that it takes at least 30 days for half of the vulnerable companies on the Internet to fix the most critical flaws. Easing the pain of patching is important, he said.

"It's a single patch on a scheduled day," he said. "Everyone knows today is Microsoft patch day. I think this is the right thing to do."

Eschelbeck recommended that companies apply at least the first patch from Microsoft by the end of the week.

Information on the four patches can be found on Microsoft's Web site.

Talkback

...but you can't get the patches because MS machines are totally overwhelmed by everyone trying to update at the same time.Perhaps spreading out the updates wasn't such a bad idea after all..?

via Facebook 14 April, 2004 10:11
Reply

Don't install Hotfix 835732 on Windows 2000 SP4.

After restart it will use 100% CPU and you will have to wait for 30 minutes just to login!.

The only way to fix this is to wait and run a command prompt and uninstall it.

Removal Information

To remove this update, use the Add or Remove Programs tool in Control Panel.

System administrators can also use the Spuninst.exe utility to remove this security update. The Spuninst.exe utility is located in the %Windir%\$NTUninstallKB835732$\Spuninst folder. The Spuninst.exe utility supports the following setup switches:

/?: Show the list of installation switches.

/u: Use unattended mode.

/f: Force other programs to quit when the computer shuts down.

/z: Do not restart when the installation is complete.

/q: Use Quiet mode (no user interaction).

via Facebook 14 April, 2004 10:34
Reply

I agree with Chris Leigh. I have spent all morning trying to patch.

Better that vulnerabilities are patched timeously rather than advertised over long periods of time to be exploited.

Monthly releases of patches are a bad idea from the security and (non-M$) commercial point of view

via Facebook 14 April, 2004 14:07
Reply

Security patches from MS installed overnight (4-15-04) on corporate lan machines. Many users now reporting that the History files have disappeared and are wiped clean each time IE browser is closed.

via Facebook 15 April, 2004 19:59
Reply

this behaviour of the system process to use 100% kernel mode time is independent of the service pack on w2k; but it happens not on all machines. To uninstall, don't wait, just cut off and reboot in save mode and uninstall there, this is much faster than waiting.

via Facebook 16 April, 2004 14:54
Reply

This happened to me too and I tried uninstalling the Hotfix 835732 just like you said. I left it running all night and it did not finish. I had to completely reinstall Windows 2000.

I was not very happy.

via Facebook 18 April, 2004 05:05
Reply

On our Win 2000 Pro machines installing the 835732 patch casued the machines to boot to a 'blue screen of death'. Rebooting to the Last GOod Configuration allowed us to unistal the patch and restore use of the machine.

via Facebook 23 April, 2004 14:11
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

3 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

4 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

5 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

7 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

10 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

10 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

11 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

13 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

19 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

21 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

21 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

22 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

23 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

24 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

1 day ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?