AOL dumps Microsoft's Sender ID

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS
America Online (AOL) has ditched Microsoft's Sender ID technology in favour of Sender Policy Framework (SPF).

The move follows concerns over Sender ID voiced by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) earlier this week. Explaining its decision, AOL cited a low level of support for the technology in the open source community, as well as possible problems with backward compatibility.

"AOL has decided to move forward with SPF-only checking on inbound email at this time. This means AOL will now not be moving forward with full deployment of the Sender ID protocol," said a spokesman for the firm in an email statement. "The licensing of Sender ID technology has never been a focus of concern for the company and its potential deployment of Sender ID technology."

Although AOL said it would take into account the interests of the open source community, its chief reason for the move was that the Microsoft technology was inadequate, AOL said. "AOL has serious, technical concerns that Sender ID appears not to be fully, backwardly-compatible with the original SPF specification -- a result of recent changes to the protocol and a wholesale change from what was first envisioned in the original Sender ID plan," the statement said.

But AOL still intends to publish Sender ID files so its users can use applications that require the technology.

In a prepared statement, Microsoft said: "AOL's decision to conduct only 'MAIL FROM' checks as outlined in the original SPF proposal reflects exactly the kind of flexibility and room for choice provided by the IETF's revised Sender ID proposal. What's encouraging about AOL's announcement is that they will join us in publishing both records and we continue to recommend that all mail senders do the same."

Earlier this week, the IETF rejected Microsoft's controversial proposal for Sender ID because of possible conflicts with pending Microsoft patents. Critics charged that Microsoft's licensing requirements would have prevented open-source software makers from sublicensing the technology, although others argued sublicensing would not have been a problem.

Sender ID, like SPF, is a technology that verifies the authenticity of an email sender's "@" address, such as "@yourbank.com", by validating the underlying, numeric Internet Protocol address. The system combines Microsoft's "Caller ID for Email Technology" and SPF, authored by Meng Wong, chief technology officer at Pobox.com.

AOL's announcement illustrates the brewing standards battle for email authentication technology for fighting spam. One of the most reviled byproducts of the Internet, spam has become a problem that plagues consumers, corporate networks and email providers such as AOL, MSN and Yahoo.

All three of the Internet giants are putting their weight behind their own systems. AOL has used SPF since 2003; Microsoft is pushing for Sender ID; and Yahoo is supporting Domain Keys, which uses digital signatures and can be employed alongside SPF or Sender ID. These technologies take different stabs at the same problem, and each company is trying to drum up support among industry players.

Despite public statements about cooperation, AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo made independent moves to turn their systems into standards. All three companies have submitted proposals to the IETF in the hope that their preferred technology will become the industry standard for antispam efforts.

Yahoo spokeswoman Mary Osako said in an email that the company "is continuing to evaluate a variety of industry solutions including those that are IP-based, such as SPF and Sender ID, and those that are cryptographic, such as DomainKeys. Yahoo is focusing efforts around DomainKeys, which provide an effective and scalable solution to solving the phishing and email forgery problem."

CNET News.com's Jim Hu, Stefanie Olsen and Rob Lemos contributed to this report.

Talkback

Note to web authors:

This website would display much better if you used modern fonts in your CSS files.
At the moment, you are using “MS Sans Serif” which is a bitmapped font and doesn’t support anti-aliasing on Windows. This makes the website look and feel old fashioned.

Solution:
In the file http://news.zdnet.co.uk/css/zdnetuk.css change all occurrences of “ms sans serif” to “sans-serif”.

Results:
1) Anti-aliased text (font smoothing) now works.
2) Slightly smaller CSS file, therefore quicker download and quicker page view.
3) Using TrueType font is more modern, whilst retaining same look.

via Facebook 20 September, 2004 10:15
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

1 hour ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

3 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

3 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

5 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

7 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

8 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

9 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

9 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

10 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

12 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

17 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

19 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

19 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

21 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

22 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

22 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

23 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

23 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

24 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

24 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?