UK firm promises 'leak proof' secure email

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Leeds-based company jeftel, which is backed by a local mystery millionaire, has launched a 'leak proof' email system for a £25 annual subscription.

And, if you recommend jeftel's software to a friend, the company will donate a fiver to charity Save the Children.

Jeftel's system works alongside standard email packages but uses peer-to-peer technology and encryption to keep emails away from prying eyes and stop them from being copied on the string of servers that handle normal emails. It provides users with a .safe email address.

Robert Barr, jeftel's head of development, said: "It is seamless and can be installed by a non-technical person in a couple of minutes. Company directors and people who need to communicate privately need something that's easy to install and use."

"Regular email is just not secure. Around 70 per cent of security breaches are internal. And most encryption software is so complicated that it needs the help of the IT department to set up and run - and there goes your security."

Barr also pointed out that the system protects against viruses. He expects 10 million users by 2007.

Once installed, the 1MB application integrates with standard email programs and places a button on the toolbar. But to be secure, the email recipient must also use the software.

Head of a 21-person development team, Barr is not forthcoming about the company's other activities. "Another business that we are working on may go public next year. All of out projects are privately funded by individuals. Yorkshire is quite a stronghold of technology millionaires," he said.

The email project is backed by a single individual, he said. Originally priced at £15, the email application's price was raised to the level of antivirus and anti-spam software because the team thought otherwise it might not be taken seriously.

Barr sees bankers as natural users of the system along with other professions which rely on confidentiality, such as lawyers and doctors. To meet compliance issues, it can be set to store copies of emails.

Talkback

If it uses peer-to-peer technology to send the email directly then you will only be able to send the email to them while they are on-line.

Otherwise it must send it to a server, which reading between the lines, means a server hosted by the company. Which now gives you a single point of failure and a single target for hackers.

Have they really thought this one through?

via Facebook 29 September, 2004 10:56
Reply

If you check whois of jeftel.com, you see that the company is owned by the same people who own World Wide Tender/WWT Media otherwise known as worldwidetender.com and worldwidesalesoffice.com among others. This company is a known spammer who was listed by agencies such as Spamhaus, Spamcop and SPEWS at various points this year. Their ISP service was also cancelled by Pipex earlier this year for spamming. This company have proven that they will send unsolicited bulk email to any email address they know and so I'm not sure people would let a known spammer handle their email

via Facebook 1 October, 2004 14:17
Reply

If jeftel is a spamming front why is it not being given away for free, as opposed to it costing £25? That doesn't make any sense.

via Facebook 11 October, 2004 18:35
Reply

Investigation : It would be interesting to know how many people really tested the software.

Difficult to see if we use google.

If you have any information, you can contact me.

via Facebook 12 October, 2004 11:40
Reply

Yes this has been thought through.....no information travels through the public domain - it uses it's own infrastructure so in no way can a hacker gain access to the system what-so-ever. It is the same as our new serverless voip system.

via Facebook 26 November, 2004 10:48
Reply

Having worked for WWT media in the past I would state that they are indeed a 'cowboy' outfit and well worth avoiding. Their sales tactics are dubious to say the least and their results seldom match those promised.

via Facebook 8 April, 2005 23:28
Reply

I have had a salesperson from WWT Media in yesterday trying to sell us their email lead generation package.

Excellent sales presentation but very expensive at minimum £3,000 spend & I'm rather dubious of whether their promises will be fulfilled - having read the last post I would be interested to hear a little more about the organisation and their tactics if anybody is willing to give any information.

Thanks

via Facebook 14 April, 2005 09:32
Reply

Jeftel has now been rebranded as Amteus. As the sales man said to me ... We have rebranded because this was a much nicer name.

The moment you register the amteus VOIP and email software you start receiving spam emails from WWT Media, which I was never made aware of. I only had to wait 6 hours before I received the first one.

When you start to install the software it asks you to make sure your outlook or outlook express is not open...with no explanation. If you read the terms and agreement of the use of the software It leaves the end user totally liable for every eventuallity, including financial liability if your computer infects their server with a virus. The T&C obviously leaves no liability for Amteus.

This company cannot be trusted and I would recommend that no one uses their services. It is definately a front for spamming...I've proved it. Try it out yourself.... if you dare.

via Facebook 29 April, 2005 14:27
Reply

Amteus prides itself on supplying private and secure communication software.
The comment about spam is a total un truth. Not one of our growing customer base has ever recevied a spam e mail from Amteus or WWT.

People who post comments and do not leave their details say it all.

Mark.

via Facebook 16 May, 2005 11:41
Reply

The activities of Amteus Ltd and WWT in no way coincide with each other at all.

They are both separate entities and are independently run and managed professionally by knowledgable and customer focused staff. I am an employee of Amteus Ltd and would not work for a company i found to be misleading their client base.

Both companies offer internet based products that are revolutionary and of massive benefit to companies, in a number of different capacities.

Anyone posting derogatory messages do so without making their position known to the organisations themselves. The fact the messages are posted annonomously says a great deal.

I advise any company to contact Amteus if they have questions, and to find out the exciting servies we offer. We await your calls. www.amteus.com

via Facebook 23 May, 2005 20:40
Reply

From being a former employeee of both WWT and Amteus (Formerly known as Jeftel) I have to say that I did not witness anything illegal even though I felt some things verged on the immoral at times.

As has been mentioned in previous posts WWT and Amteus do operate as seperate entities even though owned by the same person and both do aim for business to business benefits - Not business to individual as such.

The main critisism that I have in regards to the systems that Amteus provides is that for anyone to benefit from their systems, at least two copies of the software must be purchased otherwise their is no benefit gained. It's an interesting research area that Amteus do but I'm afraid thats all it will be for many years to come, just research. Most people use their mobiles these days which I have heard they are working on a mobile version - they need to work more on the pricing and distribution of the system.

As from when I was there the business did change from week to week so I would contact Amteus if you have any serious queries.

via Facebook 25 May, 2005 19:33
Reply

I am a former employer of both Minorplanet (6 years ago) and Worldwidetender.com (as it was). Run by jokers, for jokers. You only need to contact former 'clients' of worldwidetender to see just how effective a business they are/were.
Perhaps ask a Yorkshire based, former Premiership soccer club.

via Facebook 10 August, 2005 17:10
Reply

for all you poor suffering investors in MPS out there who invested in the company as well as the initial management team (who embarrassed themselves to the LSE and in turn both got sacked) and ended in losing money - GUESS WHAT - they are at it again. Abrahams and Morris are taking another company to the AIM.

LETS LOOK AT THE SYNERGIES:

1) They are looking to raise £4m and initial capitalisation of £19m - MPS`s initial capitalisation was £19.4m.

2) This new company AMTEUS has only ever made sales of £24,000 and offers no particular advantage over similar services.

3) It is being talked-up like MPS was and the poor un-knowing investor will be throwing their money in the trash can.

4) They still managed to fool the investors / institutions by hiding all their expensive cars (80k+)around the corner when they visited.

5) 14 month t/over of 23k and a capitalisation of £19m on a product that has had in excess of 20 people recruited and leave trying to sell its services and offers nothing unique technology wise. If this is not "pulling the wool" nothing is.

6) Only shows two case studies of which both of them have been offered shares in this PLC.

THE WHOLE THING SUCKS. DO NOT LET THESE ROGUES INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN EVER AGAIN.

Various people in the city are looking into this flotation as i am writing this and are looking for ways to achieve its withdrawal.

If you are one of those poor souls who have been victim to this team of uncorporate gangsters, do the right thing and lets work together to stop it.

via Facebook 12 January, 2006 22:15
Reply

I came to this site via Google after receiving 3 identical e-mails from mediabuzzmail.co.uk all sent to non-existent addresses based on our domain name. I don't know what other parts of this Leeds based 'empire' do but this part certainly sends out speculative unsolcited spam e-mail.

Anyone who thinks companies like this can increase their sales is bonkers. Using their services will only antagonise potential and possibly existing customers.

via Facebook 6 July, 2006 09:09
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

3 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

11 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

12 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

13 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

15 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

16 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

18 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

18 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

18 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

19 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

21 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

1 day ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

1 day ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

1 day ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

1 day ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

1 day ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

1 day ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint