Mac users targeted by 'Opener' malware

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

A malicious script that spies on Apple Mac users was discovered over the weekend. The malware, which has been dubbed 'Opener' by Mac user groups, disables Mac OS X's built-in firewall, steals personal information and can destroy data.

Security experts say these traits are common among the thousands of viruses targeting Microsoft's ubiquitous Windows operating system but are virtually unheard of amongst the Apple Macintosh community.

Paul Ducklin, Sophos' head of technology in the Asia Pacific, told ZDNet Australia that the malware, which Sophos calls Renepo, is designed to infect any Mac OS X drives connected to the infected system and it leaves affected computers vulnerable to further hacker attack.

Ducklin said Opener disables Mac OS X's built in firewall, creates a back door so the malware author can control the computer remotely, locates any passwords stored on the hard drive and downloads a password cracker called JohnTheRipper.

According to Ducklin, Opener tries to spread by copying itself to any drive that is mounted to the infected computer. This could be a local drive, part of a local network or a remote computer.

Most worryingly, according to Ducklin, this could be the start of a spate of malware that uses Mac OS X's scripting features against its users.

"The existence of Unix shells -- such as Bash for which Opener is written -- and the presence of powerful networking commands opens up the game a little bit for Mac users. It is no longer necessary to know about Mac file formats or executables you can write your malware in script and if you really wanted to you could probably write a portable virus that would run on many flavours of Unix (and Mac)," said Ducklin.

Chris Waldrip, president of the US-based Atlanta Macintosh Users Group, posted a detailed description of Opener on the MacInTouch Web site.

According to Waldrip, who admits the malware has him "a bit spooked", Opener seems to have started out with a "legitimate purpose" but has now been developed into a replicating piece of malware.

"I'm not sure how this could be guarded against," he said.

Mikko Hyppönen, director of antivirus research at F-Secure, said that viruses targeting the Macintosh system virtually disappeared in the late 80s.

"Things have been really quiet on Macintosh front, virus-wise. Back in the late 1980s, viruses used to be a much bigger problem on Macs than on PCs. We here at F-Secure used to have an antivirus product for Mac but discontinued it after the macro viruses died out," said Hyppönen.

Symantec said users of Norton AntiVirus for Mac OS X were protected as long as they had updated their signatures over the weekend. A spokesperson for the company said the relevant signature files had been available since Friday evening.

Munir Kotadia reported from Sydney for ZDNet Australia. For more ZDNet Australia stories, click here.

Talkback

If this is a virus, why is there no mention of how it is transmitted?

If you follow the link to the Chris Waldrip posting, you will notice that none of the people who comment on the "virus" posting think it is a virus. Rather it seems like a cracker manually breaking into the system.

It seems like poor journalism to put up an article on a "virus" without having identified the information about viruses that a uses actually needs, how it spreads and thus how it could get onto your machine.

via Facebook 25 October, 2004 14:56
Reply

So if I write a program that for instance,
- deletes files from a computer and
- I then include documentation such as a read me or messages in the program itself stating very clearly that the program can delete your files and
- documentation telling you how to run the program for the purposes of deleting your files and
- just for the sake of argument let's say I call the program Finder, will you idiots in the press call it a virus too?

And will the anti-virus company spokespersons be labeling it a worm since after all, Finder can copy itself...

Is there anyone in the press (or the anti-virus industry) that has ANY CLUE at all?

via Facebook 26 October, 2004 00:28
Reply

"There has been a security alert about malware that targets computers running Apple's OSX"
The opener script does not target anything, it can not install itself. A human may target someone's OS X computer, crack it and then install the script but the important thing to remember is that the person must already have access.

"The malware, which has been dubbed 'Opener' by Mac user groups, disables Mac OS X's built-in firewall, steals personal information and can destroy data."
It copies personal information in the form of passwords and preference files to another location on the same hard drive where those files are accessible via network connections. The only data files destroyed by the script are log files - no other personal data files are deleted.

"Ducklin said Opener disables Mac OS X's built in firewall, creates a back door so the malware author can control the computer remotely"
It does not create a backdoor. It turns on some of the standard sharing services that are part of the operating system.

"Opener tries to spread by copying itself to any drive that is mounted to the infected computer. This could be a local drive, part of a local network or a remote computer."
Opener only tries to copy itself to drives that appear to have the OS X System installed. Opener can not copy itself to a network volume. First, the script runs at startup so the network volume would have to be mounted before any user has logged in. Second, the network volume would have to be the root directory of a hard drive - which OS X will not share by default and there is no option within the OS X GUI to do so. Last, Apple's file sharing will not allow root to login to a remote computer and no matter what the user has logged in as, they will not have write access to /System/Library/StartupItems on the remote volume. OPENER CAN NOT COPY ITSELF TO NETWORK VOLUMES, THE ANTIVIRUS COMPANIES ARE BEING DISHONEST WHEN THEY SAY THAT IT CAN.

"viruses targeting the Macintosh system virtually disappeared in the late 80s"
Try, "Virtually never appeared at all and there are currently ZERO viruses known to infect Mac OS X"

http://freaky.staticusers.net/ugboard/viewtopic.php?t=10712

via Facebook 30 October, 2004 16:21
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

13 minutes ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

8 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

9 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

11 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

16 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

18 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

20 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

21 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

21 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

23 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?