There's no worm in your Apple - honest

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Apple has denied that the malicious code dubbed 'Opener' is a worm, a Trojan or a virus of any kind.

Discovered a week ago, the Opener program – originally called Renepo - has the ability to disable the firewall in Mac OS X and steal user information. Security experts declared last week that it is almost unheard of for malware to target Apple computers, but said that this could be the start of a spate of attacks to come.

In an emailed statement from a PR company that represents Apple, a spokeswoman said:

"Apple has just released the following statement and will not comment beyond this: 'Opener is not a virus, Trojan horse, or worm. It does not propagate itself across a network, through email, or over the Web. Opener can only be installed by someone who already has access to your system and provides proper administrator authentication. Apple advises users to only install software from vendors and Web sites that they know and trust.'"

But antivirus experts beg to differ, saying that while the program is not an immediate threat, it is a worm because it attempts to copy itself, is therefore a virus as well.

Antivirus company Sophos said: "Renepo is a worm, and since a worm is just a special type of virus - one which neither requires nor uses an existing host file as a carrier - it is a virus."

"I know there has been a lot of debate about this," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant for Sophos. "We class it as a worm. It's not going to spread very fast, but it does try to copy itself from Apple Mac drive to Apple Mac drive, and that still makes it a worm. If you saw something similar in the PC world, you would call it a worm."

Symantec declared that Mac owners were protected if they had kept their antivirus software up to date.

Additional reporting by Munir Kotadia

Talkback

"Blighting" - one person has this malware installed on their Mac without their knowledge and this constitutes a "blighting" of OS X? Lay off the hysterical hyperbole will you. Sheesh.

via Facebook 1 November, 2004 18:10
Reply

"Apple Macintosh has denied that the malicious code dubbed 'Opener' is a worm, a Trojan or a virus of any kind"

That would be Apple COMPUTER, Inc. The Macintosh is the generic name of computers sold by the company. They have not sold a Macintosh for years.

via Facebook 1 November, 2004 18:23
Reply

If opener was PC malware, it would be classified as spyware not a virus. Spyware is an application or process that is installed (knowingly or unsuspectingly) for the purpose of collecting information or activities. This collected information may then be passed on to a 3rd party who uses it to compromise the system even more. Viruses, on the other hand, attach themselves to files and try to spread to other files or the OS. In the old days, they spread to other machines by floppies, zip disks or file sharing. With the net, they infect an OS and try to transmit themselves via transmission sockets. If it emails itself out, it's most likely a trojan horse because it tries to get the receiver to read the email and click on it. If it port-scans neighboring machines and tries to burrow through known security holes, it's a worm. Some viruses are hybrids. Based on these traditional viewpoints, opener is neither a trojan horse, worm, or a hybrid. It's spyware!

via Facebook 1 November, 2004 20:07
Reply

You are of course right about the erroneous Macintosh reference - we've removed it.

via Facebook 1 November, 2004 20:22
Reply

If someone can sit down on your machine to install it - why not just steal your HDD or your computer? Why not lock your front door? Why not live in a better neighborhood? Why not go to a better school so you make more money? Why not have smarter parents?

Danger - a meterorite could strike you while you're working at your Mac. So far, the affected and danger quotient seems to be about the same WORLDWIDE.

Yea, just like a PC where there about 780 critical alerts a month.

I know you're DESPERATE to puncture a hole in the whole happay world of Mac users bubble and be the first on the scene but we're all still merrily going on our way.

No worries.

via Facebook 1 November, 2004 20:55
Reply

No worries with Opener.

But the worst thing that could kill Mac users right now is complacency. The more you brag, the harder some folks are going to work to show you and your oh-so-secure machines up.

Keep your wits about you, update your virus defs and be smart.

It's good computing advice no matter where you go.

via Facebook 1 November, 2004 22:09
Reply

The Anti-virus vendors classify it as a virus.
I'm shocked, SHOCKED that Apple would disagree with an anti-virus company over the definition of 'virus.'

After all, it's not like the anti-virus companies -- who have no vested interest in whether they sell software or not -- would EVER claim that there are viruses for the Mac just to sell software.

Also, the malware was originally called "Opener", as Renepo is just Opener spelled backwards.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 00:30
Reply

It does not make sense to pay for and use anti-virus software when no viruses exist, as that software may cause conflicts, problems or slowness.

However, everyone should back up data regularly (for most people, that means daily) and install software updates when they are available.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 00:47
Reply

So by Sophos' standards, if I try to jump to Pluto (even though I can't) they would declare me the first person to visit Pluto?

The "opener" (stop colluding with these dimwits by calling it renepo) script does not specifically try to copy to network shares (if it did, startup would be a rather illogical time to try) and looking at the script it appers it can't properly install itself even on local drives.

In the Windows world we would call this a batch file and we would call Sophos spokespersons "SHAMELESS LIARS."

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 04:59
Reply

Antivirus company Sophos said: "Renepo is a worm, and since a worm is just a special type of virus - one which neither requires nor uses an existing host file as a carrier - it is a virus."

Applying the same logic... a stick is a carrot and since a carrot is just a special type of vegetable - a stick is a vegetable.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 05:48
Reply

Yes. It is just a batch file.

If you are familiar with bash scripting it's really simple to follow. It just gathers user prrofile data ONCE INSTALLED. It has no way to install itself though. It isn't remotely close to being a virus, or a trojan.

It's amazing to see the facts get twisted around this "opener" script as each commercial organization reports it.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 05:56
Reply

Well since Sophos representatives are already on record as calling it a virus and a worm I guess they can't back down now without looking even more stupid.

I'm definitely not buying any software they write, I'd rather run opener. :)

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 07:47
Reply

Some versions of Opener are worms, all are spyware.

The Opener/Worm replicates himself when a / partition of a distant machine is mounted (by an admin of the distant machine). It replicates himself by creating a /Library/StartupItems on the distant machine, and copying itself in this directory. This mode of propagation is very inefficient, and Opener/Worm should not be feared.

The security flaw used by Opener/Worm is the access rights on /Library, which by defaut is writable by the admin group. Apple should issue a security patch that corrects this flaw.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 11:21
Reply

If this is a virus, it's like the joke goes with the "Irish Virus" (no offence intended to the Irish). Please install this on your machine (as step 1 of the joke goes).

This "OPENER" does not spread, it sends information to other people, but by no stretch of the imagination does it spread.

The fact that it has to be a manual install, is the give away. It CANNOT be installed on any other machine without MANUAL INTERVENTION, ergo, not a virus/worm or whatever name those virus-killer SELLERS want to call it.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 12:22
Reply

Facts:-
My apple doesn't get hammered with viruses, dialers, spyware, popups or worms. Unlike my 3 PC's which I have to constantly battle with just to keep them working. I visit the same web sites on apple and pc and frequently check the same emails.

Anyone who gets bothered by this Opener crap is simply careless.

Who you going to believe? Apple or Sophos?
Who has the most to gain? My money is on Steve Jobs' lot.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 14:09
Reply

"Symantec declared that Mac owners were protected if they had kept their antivirus software up to date."

The Bush administration declared that American Mac owners were protected if they remained in a perpetual state of fear and shut up and did what they were told.

The American Association of Dentists declared that Mac owners were protected if they brushed 3 times a day and had a checkup every 60 days.

The Wizards Alliance declared that Mac owners were protected if they carried a WA approved talisman at all times. WA approved talismans are now 33% off, and include a special anti-terrorist charm bracelet! Buy now!

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 14:51
Reply

Bullshit! just a buch of jerks try to beat the drum for wothless software.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 15:07
Reply

Opener is just a script that must be run by an Admin, big deal.

But the PC press lives for the days that they can write stories that use the terms virus, worm, critical security flaw, etc. without having to mention that they only affect Microsoft products.

And the antivirus companies wouldn't exist if they had to rely on business from Mac and Linux users, so who can blame them for trying to exploit every potential non-Windows security problem?

So let's let them enjoy this brief moment. They don't get many of them.

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 17:20
Reply

Thank's to the complete lack of credibility of Sophos and Symantec, if a virus ever did show up for OS X, would anyone still want to purchase their software?

Lets think about this, "Opener" was originally created over 6 months ago, and now we're finally hearing about it?

That timeframe suggest nothing more than desparate measures by desparate people trying to make a few extra bucks during the biggest income quarter of the year. In Sophos case, that can't amount to much.

Sorry but "forgettaboutit".

via Facebook 2 November, 2004 23:05
Reply

grsisoft symantec and webroot are the big men now

via Facebook 3 November, 2004 08:34
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

8 minutes ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

2 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

2 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

4 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

6 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

7 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

8 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

8 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

9 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

10 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

16 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

18 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

18 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

20 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

21 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

21 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

22 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

23 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

23 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?