@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...
Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...
Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...
"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system."
Point truly missed. Both use a...
whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article.
I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...
If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...
I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....
How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...
@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...
The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel.
The first bug that I found was applying the median...
Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...
I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...
Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...
In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...
In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...
For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...
Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...
"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...
This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...
@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379.
I support ACTA so long as it and...
Talkback
SUPRNOVA.org do not and have never owned BitTorrent. It was written by someone else.
The sites that ran the trackers are not companies they provide a service and do not make money.
PLEASE get your facts right before you report on a story! From your story you appear to have NOT done any research and no nothing about the scene and what the system is. You appear to be jumping on the bandwagon and breaking a story before everyone else.
"The company behind BitTorrent, SuprNova.org, was recently attacked by Hollywood companies on a mission to shut down file-sharing companies."
Suprnova.org is not the company behind bittorrent, it was simply a website that hosted some bittorrent tracker files. The bittorrent format is developed by an external guy who has nothign to do with suprnova.
Bram Cohen is the guy behind Bittorrent - not Suprnova.org... I'd suggest a little bit of research is put into your articles before publishing them....
This story is total bull.
Bit torrent was developed by Bram Cohen (you can Google his personal website) NOT SuprNova. Bit Torrent is a distribution tool. It doesn’t even attempt to hide a users identity. This article is very irresponsible reporting. At least check Bram's or BitTorrent's website to understand the technology before you write this sort of crap.
"You have a great product, many customers, and are delivering your product to hordes of happy customers online. Serving large files creates problems of scaling, flash crowds, and reliability. As you grow, they become more central to your business, but your bandwidth costs go up as well. It's a vicious cycle.
There is a solution. BitTorrent is a simple software product which addresses all of these problems.
The key to cheap file distribution is to tap the unutilized upload capacity of your customers. It's free. Their contribution grows at the same rate as their demand, creating limitless scalability for a fixed cost."
First, Supnova and Bittorrent are not related any more than bugets and spreadsheets and Bill Gates. Bittorrent existed for two years prior to the arrival of Suprnova. If you are going to report, report the facts, not fiction,
compounding that Bittorrent is not illegal. The function is beautiful and evolutionary. There are still newer and faster things to come. The issue is do people want to be thieves, or do people want access. Maybe 12 dollars for a movie ticket, or 60 dollars for cable is more than they want to pay. Sell them what they want at a fair price.
that story is a load of crap. please get ur facts right before publishing shit.
Suprnova is NOT the company behind bittorrent, THERE IS NO company, bram cohen wrote the software and andrzej preston the 17 yr old slovenian set up a website that linked you to torrents all over the internet. he took it down for personal reasons, NOTHING TO DO WITH HOLLYWOOD, so get ur fucking facts straight before you start writing bollocks. the man in hong kong has NOTHING
NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING to do with suprnova
fucking retards
Get your facts straight! Good lord. Is can you not research?
Thanks to the readers who flagged up this error-- it's now been addressed.