A bunch of new variants of the Bagle virus and Mytob worm are spreading, but they won't pose a major threat if people take the usual precautions, security companies say.
Three new iterations of Bagle, released at one-hour intervals, popped up on Tuesday, said Maksym Schipka, a senior antivirus researcher at MessageLabs. About 70 variants of the mass-mailing computer virus have been reported since it first appeared in January 2004.
MessageLabs, which filters out malicious software from email for clients, stopped nearly 100,000 copies of the Bagle variants in the first few hours after they hit, Schipka said. "We are seeing huge volumes," he said. MessageLabs said that the new versions appear to have originated from a Yahoo group.
The new Bagles do little to trick users into running their malicious content. The email has no subject line or body text. The attachment is a ZIP archive that will attempt to download a Trojan horse from a list of Web sites, if unpacked and run. The Trojan harvests email addresses from the PC to further spread the virus, Schipka said. It also installs a backdoor.
Mytob, like Bagle, is generating new offspring. It is a malicious worm that installs a backdoor and uses its own email engine to forward itself to addresses that it gathers from infected computers.
Two new variants of Mytob have appeared over the past few days — one on Sunday and one on Tuesday, said Craig Schmugar, a virus research manager at McAfee.
New versions of Bagle and Mytob appear often. These recent ones are more of the same, said Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering at Symantec Security Response. "They are both, thankfully, fairly low-risk threats at this stage, in terms of their spread. We're seeing a low number of infections."
PC users can protect themselves by installing the latest updates for their antivirus software and using caution when opening email attachments, the security providers said.






Talkback
The Wintel treadmill is replaced by the A-V+Windows treadmill. Same Windows exploits, small variation on A-V software. These are *variants* not new malware. These are not new problems. Why do the customers of MS put up with broken designs?
The same mindset also afflicts MS hardware. Case in point the flammable xboxes:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/19/xbox_recall_nofix/
(Sorry, couldn't find ZDNet link)
Perhaps it's just sloppy editing but your article neglects to point out that this, like all viruses etc, is a Microsoft-only problem. Users of modern OS's like Linux, OS X are not affected other than by the volume of crap passed on by their legacy-OS using colleagues. Best defence? Move yourself and anyone else you care about to a virus-free computing environment. Life's better that way.
I look forward to seeing an amended article that more closely reflects the actual situation.
Regards
Perhaps it's just sloppy editing but your article neglects to point out that this, like all viruses etc, is a Microsoft-only problem. Users of modern OS's like Linux, OS X are not affected other than by the volume of crap passed on by their legacy-OS using colleagues. Best defence? Move yourself and anyone else you care about to a virus-free computing environment. Life's better that way.
I look forward to seeing an amended article that more closely reflects the actual situation.
Regards
There seem to be a lot of misconception in the industry that Linux is virus free. This gets even more highlighted due to the bad press surrounding MS Windows. I use both Linux (Fedora) & Windows and I would say Windows gets large chunk of viruses due to its market share and not because of its underlining code. Linux can be just as vulnerable as other operating systems, so please, have your preventive measures in place and drop the virus free environment.