Microsoft: 'We won't charge to fix vulnerabilities'

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

NEWS

Microsoft has witnessed an improvement in the way people are securing their computers.

Speaking at the company's TechEd conference in Amsterdam on Tuesday, Detlef Eckert, chief security advisor for Microsoft, said although the level of hacking and virus attacks remains constant, people are being more vigilant about online threats.

Eckert told ZDNet UK sister site silicon.com: "While the attacks are not going down and the network worms are still a risk, society at large has got better. What we sense is a shift of the professional criminal attacks. They are more targeted and they go on the premise 'how do we get money?' They are phishing attacks that look for bank details, espionage attacks that use Trojans or botnets that do denial-of-service attacks."

However, Mario Juarez, product manager of security for Microsoft, said that only one in three people using Windows XP in the US had downloaded Service Pack 2, which tightens security on the operating system: "We know that the percentage of people using Windows XP SP 2 is lower than we would like it to be. One in three machines that run Windows XP is running SP 2. Customers are still reluctant to upgrade."

Microsoft has recently completed the acquisition of antivirus company Sybari and launched an anti-spyware service which it says 20 million people worldwide have signed up for. Some of the anti-spyware services will be provided for free but Eckert said the antivirus product will continue to be sold.

While Microsoft currently provides free patches for vulnerabilities in Windows, Eckert said Sybari's software would carry a cost because viruses were completely unrelated to its software flaws.

"We are not charging the user for anything related to vulnerabilities," Eckert said. "There are companies that charge for updates or services. There are virus attacks that are not related to vulnerabilities but exploit user behaviour. The virus attacks look at system or user log traffic. They use port 80 or HTTP as a way to attack companies. They get into the Web server and attack you directly."

But last week antivirus expert Graham Cluley of Sophos stressed that Windows was one of the greatest problems in the antivirus world.

Cluley said: "I believe that right now the real threat is on Windows computers and servers. Last month we saw more malware and most of them targeted Windows. Today there is a 50 percent chance you will get infected in eight minutes of plugging into broadband. It's [home] users — the businesses are patching themselves — they are the ones who are spreading it about."

When asked if it was fair to charge customers for antivirus products that secure flaws in Windows, Microsoft's Juarez said: "It's about philosophy. There is an inherent premise in the issue of propriety of charging for security that resonates in an interesting way. Customers are really keen on being protected. Our principal interest is providing the means for customers to stay secure.

"It's about making the entire ecosystem safer. As Microsoft we think on a global level of what keeps the Internet safe. We need to be sure that the world is safe."

Talkback

Microsoft are on a lose/lose situation with built in 'free' anti virus software.

Including it makes technical sense but I suspect people would accuse them of abusing their monopoly if they did. Personally I think they should be allowed to include anything they want in their OS. The world doesnt need 10 competing anti-virus software companies it just needs one that works

via Facebook 6 July, 2005 10:41
Reply

You're right Jon, but the only way you get one that works is through the driving force of competition. If you don't have competition then the product simply rests on it's laurels and ends up stagnant - look at Windows.

via Facebook 6 July, 2005 14:11
Reply

I believe most anti-virus software if up to date will find most virus, ie there isnt an awful lot of difference between them. A built in Microsoft anti-virus program would work well enough (MS could just buy whoever was the market leader with petty cash) but it would destroy the market for 3rd party ones. Who would buy a 3rd party product when it was included?

via Facebook 6 July, 2005 14:47
Reply

Won't charge. Would that include W2K and W98 with no strings attached whatsoever?

via Facebook 6 July, 2005 23:04
Reply

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

1 hour ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

3 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

4 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

5 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

5 hours ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

6 hours ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

7 hours ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

13 hours ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

15 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

15 hours ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

17 hours ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

18 hours ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

18 hours ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

19 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

19 hours ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Moley

For Gnome 2 die-hards, it is possible to add icons to the bottom panel (or top top panel, if you prefer) which provide the exact Gnome 2...

20 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
ramwellian

Your comments would seem pretty naive and immature. Your 'solution' appears to be, "gee, let's all just give in to the hackers and give them...

20 hours ago by ramwellian on Cloud computing security: no more oxymoron?
BugStalker

"Interesting thought ... If you installed Win7 as a dual boot on a machine that previously only had Linux, and it wrecked your Linux installation,...

20 hours ago by BugStalker on Windows 7 Declares War on GRUB
whs001

This is an excellent summary of Ubuntu and Mint and the interface differences between them. Most such articles take a very partisan position for...

20 hours ago by whs001 on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Moley

@ewallace. Not so clear. Anyone can obtain the text, for example from here http://www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/2379. I support ACTA so long as it and...

21 hours ago by Moley on ACTA: Facts, misconceptions and questions