Securing enterprise communications

Daily Newsletters

Sign up to ZDNet UK's daily newsletter.

COMMENT

Email and other messaging technologies have, in many cases, replaced both the telephone and postal mail for business communications — and with good reason. Once you have the infrastructure in place (Internet connection, mail servers or ISP), it's less expensive than either making long distance calls or sending paper documents (especially if they need to get there quickly). It's faster than snail mail but less intrusive than a phone call, and creates a record of the content that you don't have when using the phone. It can be more secure than other means of communication if encryption is used.

Because we've come to depend so heavily on email, however, and because it's used so often and often so casually, it can present a weak spot in our corporate security plans. Attackers and spammers can use email to get things into the network that aren't wanted, from advertising that wastes time and productivity to viruses that can crash systems or cause loss of important data. Internal users can, deliberately or inadvertently, "leak" confidential company information via email. And hackers can intercept mail and learn company or client secrets.

Why you need an email security plan
Even when your company is small and you don't have any million-dollar trade secrets, protecting the integrity of email sent to and from your internal network is important. Viruses and malware don't discriminate based on size, and an infection can easily spread to everyone in your company and then to everyone outside the company who's in your employees' address books.

If you're in a regulated industry, your electronic communications may be governed by HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) or other compliance requirements that mandate privacy of certain information. Even if you're not, your company probably creates intellectual property of some sort, and developing an email security policy early on will head off many problems in the future.

Another risk is that risqué content can put the company in a position of legal liability if offensive material is construed to create a "hostile work environment". Email security mechanisms that filter out potentially offensive materials help protect against Title VII sexual harassment lawsuits based on the hostile workplace concept.

Developing an email security plan
To be effective, your email security plan must consist of two parts: policy and enforcement. Your policy should spell out what is and is not allowed in terms of incoming and outbound messages and what constitutes abuse of the company's email system. Enforcement includes technological mechanisms (filtering) and/or monitoring.

Courts have generally held that an employer has the right to set rules controlling what employees can and can't do with the company's equipment and infrastructure, and that employers also have the right to monitor usage for compliance with their rules. It is best practice to notify employees that their email will or may be monitored and to have them sign a statement confirming that they have been so notified and agree to the usage guidelines and monitoring as a condition of employment. As the company grows, it becomes more important to put this writing.

Your email security plan should address the following issues:

  • Spam/advertising control

  • Virus detection and prevention

  • Content rules

  • Encryption for sensitive messages

In a small company, you may be able to use host-based security software installed on individual computers to secure email. As the company and network grow, this becomes cumbersome and difficult to manage. You can save the cost and effort of reconfiguration by starting from the beginning with perimeter or server-based security. This will also prevent performance slowdowns of your workstations caused by host-based filtering.

Enterprise level messaging security
Large companies have two options when it comes to securing their messaging infrastructures. One is to do it yourself, in house. Add-on programs for your firewalls and server-based enterprise level programs such as Sunbelt Software's IHateSpam for Exchange, GFI's MailSecurity, SurfControl, Dynacom'si:mail, and other third party products can protect against unwanted commercial email, filter content, and protect against viruses, Trojans, scripts, and blended attacks. Filtering can be implemented at a standalone SMTP gateway or as a plug-in for your mail server software.

The second option is to use a messaging security service to handle your email. These managed services filter incoming mail before it ever even enters your network. This means not only is workstation performance unaffected, there is also no load put on your network bandwidth to bring the unwanted mail into the network, nor on your mail servers to process filtering rules.

Managed email security services include Microsoft's FrontBridge, Postini's integrated message management, IBM's Email Security Management and others. These services can handle very large volumes of email and thus are easily scalable as your business and email usage grows.
Monitoring messaging usage

Some of the content filtering programs mentioned above can be set to block content based on key words or phrases. Monitoring software such as Spector CNE can not only detect the key words you specify, but can also record email messages (both sent and received) and save them to a central location, as well as logging the content of IM and chat conversations. You can configure the monitoring software to send an alert to an administrator whenever your specified key words are detected.

Sophisticated filtering software used by services can even analyze the content of graphics files and block or trigger an alert if suspicious photos are found.

Protecting sensitive messages
By default, email messages have no real privacy; they're more like postcards than sealed letters because they can easily be read by server administrators or even hackers who use packet sniffers to capture data as it travels across the network. Encryption "seals the envelope" so that messages can only be read by the intended recipient.

There are many email encryption solutions available, most of which are based on public/private key pairs. Users need to enrol in a Public Key Infrastructure and obtain a certificate from a certification authority. Server-to-server level encryption and password protection are other options. Some managed email services also provide encryption services. For example, FrontBridge offers a secure email option that uses identity based encryption technology that uses the user's email address as the public key and automatically binds the user's identity to that key, so that it's not necessary to go through the process of obtaining certificates.

Selecting the right solution
As always, you should consider future growth and scalability from the very beginning when you choose an email security solution. Methods that work well for small networks, such as host-based junk mail and virus filtering or user-managed PGP encryption for messages, may not work so well with a larger network. A managed service can be a cost effective and scalable solution because you don't have to invest in extra hardware or software, you don't have to worry about administrative overhead, and the most popular services are set up to handle both small and large volumes of messages

Post your comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

You can also log in with Facebook. Log in or create your ZDNet UK account below

  • Login

Will not be displayed with your comment

By signing up for this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understood our Privacy Policy. Questions about membership? Find the answers in the Community FAQ

Get ZDNet UK's daily newsletter

Enter your email address to sign up

ZDNet UK Live

TerryRK

Well it seems there is something a number of us agree on. Why is the Ubuntu Unity launcher so ugly? I thought perhaps it was something to do with...

49 minutes ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Freebies202

Duplicate comments are not made intentionally. Its very good to know that now you are keeping check on this problem because sometimes a commenter...

10 hours ago by Freebies202 on Microsoft fixes blog comments, speeds up blogs with open source
kevinmchapman

"the very significant number of users" and "many (most) of us" - you have no evidence for these statements. It is a fact that most users are saying...

18 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Marg Menzies Harrison

Another grammar faux pas is the improper use of "you". When sitting down down in a restaurant, for example, I get cringe when the waitress...

20 hours ago by Marg Menzies Harrison via Facebook on 10 flagrant grammar mistakes that make you look stupid
zdnetukuser

And NOW, folks, for Canonical's next trick... Kubuntu is late. Here's a pencil. Draw your own conclusions. cf.:...

20 hours ago by zdnetukuser on Linux Minterface
Moley

@kevinmchapman. The discussion here reflects the very significant number of users who really do like the traditional menu system and who wish to...

22 hours ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

Er, no... It is an efficient means of finding the application/file/setting you need in one place. The icons are a simply a fallback for when you...

24 hours ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

Isn't the provision of a text based search an admission by the developers that the mass of icons approach does not work? I don't need to use a...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
kevinmchapman

"Unity and GNOME 3 both abandon the old text-based cascading menus in favour of a graphical icon-driven system." Point truly missed. Both use a...

1 day ago by kevinmchapman on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
TerryRK

whs001 - Thank you, I'm glad you liked the article. I absolutely agree with you on your first point. I should perhaps have made it clearer that...

1 day ago by TerryRK on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Dennis Nilsson

If we allow corporate interest to dictate the way our government circumvents due process against foreign entities then we should accept the same...

1 day ago by Dennis Nilsson via Facebook on ACTA stumbles in Germany
GHar123

I totally dislike pirating of works, I fear that artists will be deterred from creating works if they think that they are going to get ripped off....

1 day ago by GHar123 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
JCB33

How dare film makers, artists or anybody that invests in creativity stop us pirating their works for free. I want to be able to walk into my local...

1 day ago by JCB33 on ACTA stumbles in Germany
Moley

@GrueMaster. I prefer horses for courses rather than one size fits all. I, and I suspect most other computer users, do not really wish to have...

2 days ago by Moley on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
greycynic

The product that scares me every time I have to use it is the Office 2007 version of Excel. The first bug that I found was applying the median...

2 days ago by greycynic on Ten flawed products that derail productivity
GrueMaster

Nice review and very informative. One thing I'd like to add (in reply to whs001's 1st question), the main reason to have the same interface from...

2 days ago by GrueMaster on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Frederick Wrigley

I'be been using Mint 12 since the RC came out, and I am far more happy with the Cinnamon, the Mate, and, yes (with extensions), theGnome 3...

2 days ago by Frederick Wrigley via Facebook on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
bdantas

Excellent article. One small correction, though--although a fresh installation of Linux Mint 12 will, indeed, provide the user with a version of...

2 days ago by bdantas on A tale of two distros: Ubuntu and Linux Mint
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material
Alan Ralph

In related news, the ISPs club together to get the members of the Home Affairs Select Committee (ya goofed on that part, ZDNet UK) copies of "The...

2 days ago by Alan Ralph via Facebook on MPs urge ISPs to take down terrorist material